sábado, 31 de dezembro de 2011

Haiti: uma historia tragica - livro de Laurent Dubois

Haiti’s Tragic History


U.S. Marine Corps/National Geographic Society, via Corbis
A U.S. Marine inspecting a troop of Haitian soldiers, 1920.



For the better part of two centuries, outsiders have been offering explanations that range from racist to learned-sounding — the supposed inferiority of blacks, the heritage of slavery, overpopulation — for why Haiti remains the poorest country in the Western Hemisphere. None of these work: nearby Barbados has a greater population density, and about 90 percent of its people are descended from slaves, yet it outranks all but two nations in Latin America on the United Nations Human Development Index. Neither Barbados nor any other country, however, had so traumatic and crippling a birth as Haiti.


HAITI

The Aftershocks of History
By Laurent Dubois
434 pp. Metropolitan Books/Henry Holt & Company. $32.

Related

Robert W. Kelley/Time & Life Pictures — Getty Images
François (Papa Doc) Duvalier, foreground, relied on the violence of the Tontons Macoute to hold on to power.
As a French possession, it was once the most lucrative colony on earth, producing nearly one-third of the world’s sugar and more than half its coffee. All, of course, with the labor of slaves. And slavery in the Caribbean was particularly harsh: tropical diseases were rife, there was no winter respite from 12-hour workdays under the broiling sun, and the planters preferred to replenish their labor force by working their slaves to death over a decade or two and then buying new ones. In 1791, what today is Haiti became the scene of the largest slave revolt in history. Over the next 13 years, the rebels fought off three successive attempts to re-enslave them. The first was by local planters and French soldiers, aided by arms from the United States, whose president and secretary of state, George Washington and Thomas Jefferson, were both slave owners horrified by the uprising. The second was by the British, at war with France and eager for fertile sugar land and slaves to work it. And finally, after he took power, Napoleon tried to recapture the territory as a French colony and restore slavery.
Ill-armed, barefoot and hungry, the rebels fought against huge odds: Britain dispatched an armada of 218 ships to the Caribbean, and its troops battled for five years before withdrawing; Napoleon sent the largest force that had ever set sail from France, losing more than 50,000 soldiers and 18 generals to combat and disease. The former slaves lost even more lives defeating these invasions, and no country came to their aid. This blood-soaked period also included a horrific civil war, periods of near famine, and the massacre or flight into exile of most educated people and skilled workers of any color. By the time Haiti declared independence in 1804, many of its fields, towns and sugar mills were in ruins and its population shrunken by more than half. The Haitian Revolution, as it is known today, was a great inspiration to slaves still in bondage throughout the Americas, but it was devastating to the country itself.
For a gripping narrative of that period, there are few better places to turn than “Avengers of the New World: The Story of the Haitian Revolution,” by Laurent Dubois, a Duke University scholar of the French Caribbean. Now Dubois has brought Haiti’s story up to the present in an equally well-written new book, “Haiti: The Aftershocks of History,” which is enriched by his careful attention to what Haitian intellectuals have had to say about their country over the last two centuries.
The history is a tale of much misery, shot through with flashes of hope and bravery. Both the United States and the colonial powers in Europe were profoundly threatened by the specter of slaves who had successfully battled for their freedom; the United States didn’t even recognize Haiti for over 50 years. Still worse, France in 1825 insisted that Haiti pay compensation for the plantations taken from French owners. In case the Haitians did not agree, French warships lay offshore. The sum the French demanded was so big that a dozen years later, paying off this exorbitant ransom, and paying the interest on loans taken out for that purpose, was consuming 30 percent of Haiti’s national budget. The ruinous cycle of debt continued into the next century.
Seldom, however, can outsiders be blamed for all a country’s troubles. More disastrous than foreign interference was that Haiti’s birth was such a violent one. Democracy is a fragile, slow-growing plant to begin with, and the early Haitians had experienced none of it, not as subjects of the African kingdoms where many of them were born, not as slaves and not as soldiers under draconian military discipline for over a decade of desperate war. In Haiti’s succession of constitutions over its first hundred years, the president sometimes held his post for life, and it’s no surprise that one leader began calling himself king and another emperor. Furthermore, the revolution itself had seemed to show that any change in government could take place only through military force. As Dubois sums it up: “The only way for an outsider to take power — one that would be used again and again over the course of the 19th century — was to raise an army and march on the capital.”

Brute force still ruled in the next century, climaxing in the three-decade reign of the Duvaliers, father and son. Their militia, the dreaded Tontons Macoute, spread terror on a scale exceeding anything before, murdering as many as 60,000 people. François (Papa Doc) Duvalier banned any civic organization that could threaten his control, even the Boy Scouts.

HAITI

The Aftershocks of History
By Laurent Dubois
434 pp. Metropolitan Books/Henry Holt & Company. $32.

Related

The family’s close ties with the United States were immortalized by a famous photograph of Papa Doc and the presidential envoy Nelson Rockefeller waving from the balcony of Haiti’s National Palace. During the cold war, a strongman like Duvalier, no matter how brutal, could usually count on American support as long as he was vocally anti-Communist. Father and son understood this well and shrewdly used that knowledge to retain power, as did petty tyrants across Latin America, Africa and Asia.
Deep American meddling in Haiti did not end with the cold war. Dubois, however, devotes only a few pages to the quarter-century since Jean-Claude (Baby Doc) Duvalier was overthrown, and doesn’t really tell us what he thinks about the controversial progressive Jean-Bertrand Aristide and the degree to which the United States played a role in his ouster as Haiti’s president in 2004. In an otherwise authoritative history, this is a disappointing omission.
Part of this book does feel chillingly up to date, however: its account of the United States Marine occupation of Haiti for some two decades starting in 1915. The occupation was accompanied by high-flown declarations of benevolence, but the real motive was to solidify American control of the economy and to replace a constitution that prevented foreigners from owning land. The Marines’ near-total ignorance of local languages and culture sounds all too much like more recent expeditions. American officials declared, accurately enough, that the Haitian government was in bad shape and needed reform. But as the troops on the ground discovered, like their counterparts in Iraq and Afghanistan, no one likes to be reformed at the point of a foreigner’s gun. “We were not welcome,” wrote one private Dubois quotes. “We could feel it as distinctly as we could smell the rot along the gutters.” The Americans soon found themselves fighting off waves of rebellion against their rule. United States troops burned entire villages accused of sheltering insurgents and ruthlessly executed captured rebels or — does this sound familiar? — men who might have been rebels; often there was no way to distinguish them from local farmers.
When they finally pulled out, the Marines did leave some roads, clinics and schools behind them. But the occupation’s death toll, humiliation and theft of resources, Dubois makes clear, loom far larger in Haitian memory. Even with the best of intentions, which the Marines certainly didn’t have in 1915, nation-building is no easy job. Administered less arrogantly and in cooperation with Haitians themselves, aid from abroad can sometimes help, as with the work of the estimable, Creole-speaking Dr. Paul Farmer and his Partners in Health program, which brings health care to the poorest rural areas and helps train Haitian medical workers. But the real freeing of Haiti from the burdens of its past — a task now made immeasurably greater by the catastrophic earthquake of 2010 — can be done only by Haitians themselves.



sexta-feira, 30 de dezembro de 2011

Voce aguenta besteirol? Aguente, so acontece no final do ano...

Inacreditável: não dá mais para assistir sequer um jornal supostamente de negócios como o jornal das Dez, da GloboNews. Ela também passou a se dedicar ao besteirol típico dos canais abertos.

Vocês aguentam besteirol? Só um pouco, prometo. Então vamos lá.

O jornal supostamente sério convidou um astrólogo com cara de debilóide para se pronunciar sobre política e economia, no Brasil e no mundo.
E ele não se privou de nada... e pode nos esclarecer sobre o que dizem os astros sobre o nosso futuro.
Ouçam, ou leiam, o que ele disse, especialmente sobre a crise e o comportamento do Brasil.

Ele considera, por exemplo, que a quadratura entre Urano e Plutão -- sendo que Urano se encontra atualmente em Aries e Plutão em Capricórnio -- reforça este momento de crise, em que vivem os principais países desenvolvidos, e provoca outras consequências em vários lugares: primavera árabe, ditadores caindo aqui e ali, agravamento dos problemas na Europa e nos EUA, que estão numa cilada política, e que vai até 2016 ou 2017.
Apesar, disso tudo, o Brasil - que é de Virgem -- será extremamente beneficiado por essa situação, pois (acreditem, sic três vezes), ele sempre se dá bem quando tem crise lá fora.
Segundo o astrólogo político-econômico, vamos (ou seja, o Brasil vai) ter um crescimento pelo menos até a metade da década de 2020. 
Uau! (Esse sou eu.)
Que mais ele disse?
Enfim, respondendo a outras perguntas debilóides de jornalistas idem, ele reafirmou que o Brasil passa por fase interessante, e terá crescimento ao longo da década. 
Parece que precisamos aproveitar, pois é nossa época de prosperidade e de crescimento, mesmo com a crise lá fora.
E agora, quanto à governabilidade do governo Dilma?
Parece que ela vai ter algum tipo de problema entre janeiro e abril, principalmente entre 24 de janeiro e 4 de abril.
E parece que nem o  Mercosul escapa da crise: ele tem uma tal de "marca retrógrada", que vai se manifestar sob a forma de desavenças entre seus membros, e o Brasil terá dificuldades de negociação com os parceiros.


Uau! (Sou eu outra vez!)


Eu não sei por que estou escrevendo tanta besteira num blog que se pretende inteligente.
Às vezes a gente perde o prumo com esses astrólogos metidos a economistas e cientistas políticos...


E, por fim, besteirol, de vez em quando, alivia os dramas do mundo...
Ou não?
Paulo Roberto de Almeida 



Uma vez corrupto... (alguma novidade nisso?)

TCU pega mais uma irregularidade no Dnit 
 30 de Dezembro de 2011


O Departamento Nacional de Infraestrutura de Transportes (Dnit), órgão do Ministério dos Transportes, terá de explicar ao Tribunal de Contas da União (TCU) indícios de graves irregularidades nas obras de implantação da rodovia BR-440, próximo a Juiz de Fora, em Minas Gerais.
O que foi
A fiscalização do TCU constatou que não houve análise da concorrência, o projeto básico é deficiente e o contrato foi sub-rogado e reajustado acima do limite legal.
Estaca a zero
Segundo a Agência Brasil, o problema foi informado à Comissão Mista de Orçamentos do Congresso Nacional e o tribunal determinou que o Dnit rescinda o contrato firmado com a construtora imediatamente. O tribunal ainda apura se houve indícios de sobrepreço no contrato.
Tudo pelo povo
Para o ministro-relator, Raimundo Carreiro, as alegações de que tais obras irão propiciar conforto e segurança aos veículos e pedestres não são compatíveis com boas práticas de gestão da coisa pública.

Liu Xiaobo e o Estado repressor da China


ESSAY

Liu Xiaobo’s Plea for the Human Spirit

Espen Rasmussen for The New York Times
In absentia: An image of Liu Xiaobo in Oslo during the ceremonies marking his winning of the 2010 Nobel Peace Prize.
Related“I have no enemies, and no hatred.” Liu Xiaobo, the 2010 Nobel Peace Prize winner, spoke those words on Dec. 23, 2009, just before he was sentenced to 11 years in prison for “incitement of subversion of state power.” It was his fourth jail term since the Tiananmen Square massacre of 1989. Liu is the only Chinese citizen to win any Nobel while living in China and, as Perry Link notes in introducing a new collection of Liu’s writings, one of only five Nobel Peace Prize winners unable to appear in Oslo to receive the gold medal: “In 1935, Carl von Ossietzky was held in a Nazi prison; in 1975, Andrei Sakharov was not allowed to leave the Soviet Union; in 1983, Lech Walesa feared he would be barred from re-entering Poland if he went to Oslo; and in 1991, Daw Aung San Suu Kyi was under house arrest in Burma.”
In NO ENEMIES, NO HATRED: Selected Essays and Poems (Belknap/Harvard University, $29.95), the well-­translated collection edited by Link, Tienchi Martin-Liao and Liu Xia — Liu’s wife — Liu demonstrates a considerable amount of anger while retaining his Gandhian nonviolent spirit. Taken together, his essays offer the best analysis I have read of what’s wrong in the People’s Republic of China.
Liu was the prime mover (although not the originator) of Charter 08, the petition signed by several thousand Chinese who demanded an accountable government and freedoms of speech, assembly, press and religion. The petition was the main evidence the Chinese government used against Liu when it sent him to prison in 2009, but his accusers might have reached further still, through his hundreds of articles and poems, and his 17 books. Even his 1988 Ph.D. dissertation, “Aesthetics and Human Freedom,” was “a plea for liberation of the human spirit,” as Link explains in his introduction.
Liu has always been most animated by democracy. This concern underlies his essays on Taiwan, Gorbachev’s reforms in the Soviet Union, the failures and lies of the Mao era, the “miracle” of the Deng Xiaoping reforms after Mao’s death in 1976 and, perhaps most emotively, Tibet. Even while Beijing condemned the Dalai Lama as “a wolf in monk’s clothing,” Liu breathtakingly suggested in 2008 that China could solve its ethnic unrest by inviting “the Dalai Lama back to China to serve as our nation’s president. . . . Such a move would make best use of the Dalai Lama’s stature in Tibet and around the world.”
An accomplished poet, Liu pays close attention to the power of language. Noting that the party charged him with “incitement of subversion of state power,” he said this was an excellent example “of treating words as crimes, which itself is an extension into the present day of China’s antique practice called ‘literary inquisition’ ” — a practice exemplified by the 18th-century emperor Qianlong’s purge of subversive books.
More fervently still — Liu never misses an opportunity to skewer Communist Party hypocrisy — he recalls that in the years before its victory in 1949, the party’s newspapers “were constantly criticizing the Chiang Kai-shek regime for its repression of free speech and often issued loud appeals on behalf of persecuted voices of conscience.” He contrasts this with the execution during the Cultural Revolution of Zhang Zhixin, who was condemned to death for criticizing the Mao cult; before Zhang was shot, her throat was cut so she could not cry out a final denunciation.
I recall Liu’s arrival in Tiananmen Square in May 1989. An angular, awkward, bespectacled man bending over and waving his arms, he exhorted the demonstrators to add democracy to their demands for a free press and an end to corruption. On June 2, he and three friends announced the start of a hunger strike. “We seek not death,” they read out to a crowd that had fallen silent, “but to live true lives.” They emphasized that “we should recognize that all Chinese citizens are strangers to the matter of running a country on democratic principles. . . . We must not let hatred or violence poison our thinking. . . . We are citizens before we are anything else.” The next night the tanks and soldiers of the People’s Liberation Army crashed into the square and began the slaughter of many hundreds. Liu and a few others negotiated with the soldiers to allow the surviving students to leave the square in safety.
Some of Liu’s most eloquent observations came afterward. He recalls “the cruelty of the executioners and, even more clearly, the brightness of humanity that shone in the midst of great terror.” Liu faults himself for seeking shelter after the massacre rather than staying in the square to help the victims. Soon after, he was imprisoned for the first time — the sentence was for 19 months. In 2003 he wrote, “I remain acutely aware that I am the lucky and undeserving survivor of a massacre in the waning years of a dictatorship.” Referring to himself ironically as “one of those ‘influential’ figures” on the night of the killings, Liu remembers that “all the people who . . . went out to rescue the wounded or received heavy sentences were common people,” and that “the blood of ordinary people has gone to nourish the reputations of opportunists large and small, people who run around presenting themselves as the leaders of a ‘people’s movement.’ ” I think I know who Liu means, but those who survived, like him, were also heroes who waited to flee until death was staring them in the face.
Nothing escapes Liu’s scalpel. The economic reforms that have transfixed many foreigners who claim that China is on its way to being No. 1 were not the result, he insists, of top-down policies. They arose, he says, from demonstrations in Beijing and the countryside that began even while Mao was alive: peasants called for control over the crops they grew, and ordinary workers like Wei Jingsheng put their mark on Democracy Wall in 1978-79. Liu writes that Deng Xiaoping and his colleagues in the Chinese leadership granted a little more space to those who demanded to be treated like citizens — before stamping on them. “These spontaneous popular forces for reform were rooted in the human longing for freedom and justice, not some slogans of the rulers.”
Always he sees words as the party’s enemy: “Democracy Wall laid a foundation for language — and hence a system of values — that was independent of official ideology.” In a foreword to “No Enemies, No Hatred,” the late Vaclav Havel observed that Charter 08 “articulated an alternative vision of China, challenging the official line that any decisions on reforms are the exclusive province of the state.” Liu notes that the Internet has provided China’s people with news and views of the world hitherto denied them and a way to communicate instantly and often safely. But he laments that “under the guise of restoring national honor . . . thuggish language that unabashedly celebrates violence, race hatred and warmongering passion now haunts the Chinese Internet.”
After Liu was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2010, Beijing cowed 16 ambassadors to Norway into shunning the ceremony. An empty chair on the Oslo stage highlighted Liu’s absence. His words, however, are always with us. Already in 2003, Liu wrote that those “who dare to speak out about major public events may not receive tangible benefits, but they receive the very considerable reward of high moral reputation among fellow Chinese as well as in the international community.” Within Liu’s dark Communist world, the court’s judgment was wholly correct: “Defendant Liu Xiaobo has committed the crime of incitement to subvert state power.”

Jonathan Mirsky, a journalist and historian specializing in China, was named British International Reporter of the Year in 1990 for his dispatches from Tiananmen Square.

Politica externa do Brasil: diplomacias de FHC e Lula

Relembrado por um leitor, ou simples passante neste blog, acabei retomando um velho trabalho, disponível neste link:
http://www.pralmeida.org/05DocsPRA/1227PolExtFHCLulaMiami.pdf

Summit of the Americas Center
Florida International University
Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais
MARC Pavillion (FIU), March 4, 2004

Seminar on Brazil - Between Regionalism and Globalism: Old Ambitions, New Results?
9:10 – 10:00 Panel 1 - Historic Background/Scene Setter

Two Foreign Policies From Cardoso to Lula 
Paulo Roberto de Almeida

Esse trabalho foi citado no livro de Parag Kahnna, The Second World.
Bem, era isso. 
Provavelmente, eu seria menos condescendente, hoje, com certas políticas...
Paulo Roberto de Almeida 

Postagem em destaque

Madame IA e Paulo Roberto de Almeida, via Airton Dirceu Lemmertz: um lento processo de acomodação

Madame IA e Paulo Roberto de Almeida, via Airton Dirceu Lemmertz: um lento processo de acomodação  Em ordem cronológica de todas as postagen...