O que é este blog?

Este blog trata basicamente de ideias, se possível inteligentes, para pessoas inteligentes. Ele também se ocupa de ideias aplicadas à política, em especial à política econômica. Ele constitui uma tentativa de manter um pensamento crítico e independente sobre livros, sobre questões culturais em geral, focando numa discussão bem informada sobre temas de relações internacionais e de política externa do Brasil. Para meus livros e ensaios ver o website: www.pralmeida.org. Para a maior parte de meus textos, ver minha página na plataforma Academia.edu, link: https://itamaraty.academia.edu/PauloRobertodeAlmeida;

Meu Twitter: https://twitter.com/PauloAlmeida53

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/paulobooks

Mostrando postagens com marcador The Edge. Mostrar todas as postagens
Mostrando postagens com marcador The Edge. Mostrar todas as postagens

quinta-feira, 2 de outubro de 2014

De volta aos saloes do Iluminismo? Desta vez em ambiente virtual... - The Edge

Edge.org
October 2, 2014
http://www.edge.org

---------------------------------------------------
THE THIRD CULTURE
---------------------------------------------------

"Despite their intense scientific depth, John Brockman runs these gatherings with the cool of an old school bohemian. A lot of these meetings indeed mark the beginning of a new phase in science history. One such example was a few years back, when he brought together the luminaries on behavioral economics, just before the financial crisis plunged mainstream economics into a massive identity crisis. Or the meeting of researchers on the new science of morality, when it was noted that the widening political divides were signs of the disintegration of American society. Organizing these gatherings over summer weekends at his country farm he assumes a role that actually dates from the 17th and 18th century, when the ladies of the big salons held morning and evening meetings in their living rooms under the guise of sociability, while they were actually fostering the convergence of the key ideas of the Enlightenment."

Salon Culture
NETWORK OF IDEAS

By Andrian Kreye, editor of The Feuilleton (Arts & Essays), Süddeutsche Zeitung in Munich.

The Salon was the engine of enlightenment. Now it's coming back. In the digital era the question might be different from the ones in the European cities of the 17th century. The rules are the same. Why is there such a great desire to spend some hours with likeminded peers in this age of the internet?

Published in French by Entrepreneur Magazin (pp. 58-65). English translation by the author.
__________

SALON CULTURE: NETWORK OF IDEAS

For more than a century now the salon as a gathering to exchange ideas has been a footnote of the history of ideas. With the advent of truly mass media this exchange had first been democratized, then in rapid and parallel changes diluted, radicalized, toned down, turned up, upside and down again. It has only been recently that a longing emerged for those afternoons in the grand suites of the socialites in the Paris, Vienna, Berlin or Weimar of centuries past, where streams of thought turned into tides of history, where refined social gatherings of the cultured elites became the engine of the Enlightenment.

Just like back then, today's new salons are mostly exclusive if not closed circles. If you do happen to be invited though you will swiftly notice the intellectual force of those gatherings. On a summer's day on Eastover Farm in Connecticut for example, in the middle of green rolling hills with horse paddocks and orchards under the sunny skies of New England. This is where New York literary agent John Brockman spends his weekends. Once a year, he invites a small group of scientists, artists and intellectuals who form the backbone of what is called the Third Culture. Which is less of a new culture, but a new form of debate across all disciplines traditionally divided into the humanities and the natural sciences, i.e., the first and second culture.


The salon, which marked a entire era: Duchess Anna Amalia of Saxe-Weimar with her guests, including Goethe (third from left) and Herder (far right).

On that weekend, for example, he had invited a half-dozen men. Each of whom had a large footprint in their respective disciplines: the gene researcher Craig Venter, who was the first to sequence the human genome; his colleague George Church, Robert Shapiro, who explored the chemistry of DNA, the astronomer Dimitar Sasselov, quantum physicist Seth Lloyd, and the physicist Freeman Dyson, who sees in his his role as scientist the need to continually question universally accepted truths. A few science writers were also present, along with Deborah Triesman, literary editor at the New Yorker.

At some of his other meetings, the number of Nobel Laureates might have been higher, but the question under discussion in the warm summer wind among rustling tops of maple trees with jugs full of freshly made lemonade, carried utmost weight: "What is life?" Seth Lloyd formulated the problem right at the start: science knows everything about the origin of the universe, but almost nothing about the origin of life. Without this knowledge, the sciences, on the threshold of the biological age, are groping in the dark. ...

... The salon is still regarded as a mysterious world of thoughts and ideas, a world in which the participants soon were consigned to the role of historical figures in history books. In the early days of the salon culture these meetings were incubators of new ideas as well as the first form an urban and bourgeois culture. The first salons were formed in Paris in the early 17th century, when the nobles left their estates and are gathered in the capital around the King. Initially, they cemented these early manifestations of bourgeois culture such as music and literature. But soon philosophers such as Voltaire and Diderot appeared in the 18th century and prepared the intellectual ground for the French revolution.

In all major cities in Europe, it soon was common for ladies of high society to gather influential thinkers around them. Often, these were for their time radical gatherings, because those salons dissolved the rigid boundaries between social classes. With rational thinking of the Enlightenment, the reputation enjoyed by a person was measured in terms of intellect, not status or wealth. Berlin and Vienna were established, next to Paris, as cities of culture of the salon. But in small towns too, the intellectual life soon revolved around salons. The salons in Weimar were legendary, where Johanna Schopenhauer, the mother of the future philosopher, Arthur, and the Duchess Anna Amalia of Saxe-Weimar-Eisenach, counted Johann Wolfgang von Goethe and Friedrich Schiller among their guests.

At the same time England developed the first coffee house culture. In 1650, the first English cafe, called Grand Café, opened in Oxford. The open structure of the cafés had a tremendous effect on the culture of debate, but so did coffee and tea, the new drinks from the colonies. In a country in which the entire population at any time of day was drinking alcohol, the stimulant of caffeine acted as fertilizer for the burgeoning idea cultures. But it was mostly the lounges and cafes in Europe (and later America) that gave birth to the fundamental principle of progress and innovation, namely the network. Indeed, it was rarely the sudden Eureka-moments in the solitude of the laboratory of the study, that scientists and thinkers brought humanity from the dark times of the pre-modern era into the light of reason. It was the fierce debates held in the lounges and cafes that allowed the ideas behind these Eureka-moments to mature. ...

Permalink: http://edge.org/conversation/salon-culture-network-of-ideas

---------------------------------------------------

IN THE NEWS

LATEST: http://edge.org/edgenews
HIGHLIGHTS: http://edge.org/edge-news-highlights

---------------------------------------------------

"Take a look. No matter who you are, you are bound to find something that will drive you crazy." --NEW YORK TIMES

---------------------------------------------------

Edge Foundation, Inc. is a nonprofit private operating foundation under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.

quarta-feira, 2 de julho de 2014

Leituras do verao 2014: recomendacoes do site The Edge

To arrive at the edge of the world's knowledge, seek out the most complex and sophisticated minds, put them in a room together, and have them ask each other the questions they are asking themselves.

The Edge Summer Reading 2014


Daron AcemogluJames RobinsonAdam AlterErez Lieberman AidenNick BiltonPaul Bloom John BrockmanNicholas G. CarrTyler CowenJohn M CoatesRichard DawkinsStanislas DehaeneJared DiamondDaniel C. Dennett , Elizabeth DunnMichael I. NortonNicholas EpleyAmanda GefterGerd GigerenzerJoel GoldIan GoldDaniel GolemanRebecca Newberger GoldsteinA. C. GraylingJoshua D. GreeneBrian HareVanessa WoodsSam HarrisBruce HoodWalter IsaacsonKevin KellyDaniel KahnemanMatthew D. LiebermanDaniel LiebermanJaron LanierArmand Marie Leroi
Marcelo GleiserIan McEwanWalter MischelSendhil MullainathanEldar ShafirNathan MyhrvoldJohn NaughtonEvgeny MorozovHans Ulrich ObristSvante PääboAlex (Sandy) Pentland, 
Cass R. SunsteinLeonard Susskind, Charles SeifeLee SmolinMax TegmarkJ. Craig VenterJuan C. Zarate



sexta-feira, 26 de julho de 2013

NSA spy work: the Decision Problem - Goerge Dyson (The Edge)

-----------------------------
THE THIRD CULTURE
-----------------------------

NSA: THE DECISION PROBLEM
by George Dyson
Edge.orgJuly 26, 2013

...The ultimate goal of signals intelligence and analysis is to learn not only what is being said, and what is being done, but what is being thought. With the proliferation of search engines that directly track the links between individual human minds and the words, images, and ideas that both characterize and increasingly constitute their thoughts, this goal appears within reach at last. "But, how can the machine know what I think?" you ask. It does not need to know what you think—no more than one person ever really knows what another person thinks. A reasonable guess at what you are thinking is good enough.

Data mining, on the scale now practiced by Google and the NSA, is the realization of what Alan Turing was getting at, in 1939, when he wondered "how far it is possible to eliminate intuition, and leave only ingenuity," in postulating what he termed an "Oracle Machine." He had already convinced himself of the possibility of what we now call artificial intelligence (in his more precise terms, mechanical intelligence) and was curious as to whether intuition could be similarly reduced to a mechanical procedure—although it might (indeed should) involve non-deterministic steps. He assumed, for sake of argument, that "we do not mind how much ingenuity is required, and therefore assume it to be available in unlimited supply." 

And, as if to discount disclaimers by the NSA that they are only capturing metadata, Turing, whose World War II work on the Enigma would make him one of the patron saints of the NSA, was already explicit that it is the metadata that count. If Google has taught us anything, it is that if you simply capture enough links, over time, you can establish meaning, follow ideas, and reconstruct someone's thoughts. It is only a short step from suggesting what a target may be thinking now, to suggesting what that target may be thinking next. 

Does this not promise a safer world, protected not only from bad actors attempting to do dangerous things, but from bad actors developing dangerous thoughts? Yes, but at what cost? There's a problem, and it's the problem that Alan Turing was trying to answer when he first set us down this path. Turing delivered us into the digital age, as a 24-year-old graduate student, not by building a computer, but by writing a purely mathematical paper, "On Computable Numbers, with an Application to the Entscheidungsproblem," published in 1936. The Decision Problem, articulated by Göttingen's David Hilbert, concerned the abstract mathematical question of whether there could ever be any systematic mechanical procedure to determine, in a finite number of steps, whether any given string of symbols represented a provable statement or not. . . . [more: http://www.edge.org/conversation/nsa-the-decision-problem ]


GEORGE DYSON, Science Historian, is the author of TURING'S CATHEDRAL: THE ORIGINS OF THE DIGITAL UNIVERSE, and DARWIN AMONG THE MACHINES.


[ED. NOTE: George Dyson's piece was commissioned by Frank Schirrmacher, co-publisher of the national German newspaper FRANKFURTER ALLGEMEINE ZEITUNG (FAZ), where he is Editor of the Feuilleton, cultural and science pages of the paper. First published by FAZ on July 26, 2013.]

terça-feira, 27 de novembro de 2012

Inteligencia coletiva??? Nao, por favor, nao com certas pessoas e grupos...

Eu sempre recebo os boletins mensais do The Edge, que me pareciam sumamente inteligentes...
até este aqui abaixo.
Não, eu não acredito em inteligência coletiva, a não ser torcidas de futebol organizadas, mas aí não é exatamente inteligência, e certamente não é para boas coisas, e sim para massacrar algum desavisado do time adverário (que deus o tenha...).
Eu não quero, sobretudo, partilhar da mesma inteligência que certos movimentos, certas quadrilhas, certos indivíduos, que, inteligentes ou não, caem naquela categoria de pessoas não frequentáveis...
Paulo Roberto de Almeida

Edge.org
November 27 2012
http://www.edge.org

---------------------------------------------------
THE THIRD CULTURE
---------------------------------------------------
As all the people and computers on our planet get more and more closely connected, it's becoming increasingly useful to think of all the people and computers on the planet as a kind of global brain.

A COLLECTIVE INTELLIGENCE
A Conversation with
Thomas W. Malone [11.21.12]
http://edge.org/conversation/collective-intelligence
EdgeVideo
31 Minutes

THOMAS W. MALONE is the Patrick J. McGovern Professor of Management at the MIT Sloan School of Management and the founding director of the MIT Center for Collective Intelligence. He was also the founding director of the MIT Center for Coordination Science and one of the two founding co-directors of the MIT Initiative on "Inventing the Organizations of the 21st Century".

A COLLECTIVE INTELLIGENCE
Pretty much everything I'm doing now falls under the broad umbrella that I'd call collective intelligence. What does collective intelligence mean? It's important to realize that intelligence is not just something that happens inside individual brains. It also arises with groups of individuals. In fact, I'd define collective intelligence as groups of individuals acting collectively in ways that seem intelligent. By that definition, of course, collective intelligence has been around for a very long time. Families, companies, countries, and armies: those are all examples of groups of people working together in ways that at least sometimes seem intelligent.

It's also possible for groups of people to work together in ways that seem pretty stupid, and I think collective stupidity is just as possible as collective intelligence. Part of what I want to understand and part of what the people I'm working with want to understand is what are the conditions that lead to collective intelligence rather than collective stupidity. But in whatever form, either intelligence or stupidity, this collective behavior has existed for a long time.

What's new, though, is a new kind of collective intelligence enabled by the Internet. Think of Google, for instance, where millions of people all over the world create web pages, and link those web pages to each other. Then all that knowledge is harvested by the Google technology so that when you type a question in the Google search bar the answers you get often seem amazingly intelligent, at least by some definition of the word "intelligence." ...[MORE]

sábado, 29 de setembro de 2012

Daron Acemoglu Conversation: Institutional development


THE WORLD THROUGH INSTITUTIONAL LENSES