O que é este blog?

Este blog trata basicamente de ideias, se possível inteligentes, para pessoas inteligentes. Ele também se ocupa de ideias aplicadas à política, em especial à política econômica. Ele constitui uma tentativa de manter um pensamento crítico e independente sobre livros, sobre questões culturais em geral, focando numa discussão bem informada sobre temas de relações internacionais e de política externa do Brasil. Para meus livros e ensaios ver o website: www.pralmeida.org. Para a maior parte de meus textos, ver minha página na plataforma Academia.edu, link: https://itamaraty.academia.edu/PauloRobertodeAlmeida;

Meu Twitter: https://twitter.com/PauloAlmeida53

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/paulobooks

domingo, 21 de abril de 2013

Mark Twain: falecido num 21 de Abril, 1910 (NYT)

Este dia na História: 


ON THIS DAY

On This Day: April 21, 1910

Updated April 20, 2013, 2:28 PM
On April 21, 1910, author Samuel Langhorne Clemens, better known as Mark Twain, died in Redding, Conn.

Mark Twain is Dead at 74



End Comes Peacefully at His New England Home After a Long Illness
Conscious a Little Before
Carlyle's "French Revolution" Lay Beside Him -- "Give Me My Glasses" His Last Words
SURVIVING CHILD WITH HIM
Tragic Death of his Daughter Jean Recently did Much to Hurry his End
OTHER HEADLINESDear Cotton Hits Big Firm: Tefft-Weller Co., with $5,000,000 Assets, Forced to Reorganize, Friends Supervising: No Doubt of its Solvency: Quick Realization on its Heavy Stock Planned for the Benefit of Creditors: Bears in a Bad Flight: Liverpool Importations to Fill Short Contracts Have Caused Heavy Losses in Last Two Weeks
Turbulence in Parliament
Pittsburgh Jury Locked Up: Had Failed to Agree Over Bribery Charges Against Simon After 24 Hours
No Surveyor Chosen Yet: MacVeagh Has a Conference with Taft on New York Post
Haywood in Steel Strike: Arouses Foreign Element -- Many Return to Work -- Others Keep Out
Ovation in Paris to Mr. Roosevelt: No Reigning Sovereign Ever Had a More Enthusiastic Welcome There: Treated Like a Monarch: Calls on President Fallieres and Occupies the Presidential Box at the Comedie Francaise
Time We Awoke to Oriental Progress:Melville Stone, Back from a World Trip, Sounds a Warning to Americans: Asiatics Take Our Methods: Rapidly Adopting Modern War Measures and Making Strides in Commercial Expansion
Untermyer Sues Peabody for Libel:Demands $50,000 Damages for Reflection on His Conduct in Mutual Life Election: Says Truth Will Come Out: And Mr. Peabody Will Have an Opportunity for Much Explaining- Insurance President Tartly Retorts.
Havens for Hughes Reforms: Makes Him Available for Governorship, His Supporters Say
Fender Saves 5-Year-Old: Scooped Her Up When the Car Hit Her -- Motorman Asked to Supper
Fred Gebhard Near Death: Former Well-Known Society Man Suffering From Pneumonia
Aviator's Sea Trip:Vanderborn Takes a Passenger on a Twenty-Minute Flight
The Sommelsdyk Burned: Holland-America Steamer, About to Sail for Boston, Destroyed
Mrs. Rockefeller Improves: Wife of Oil King Goes to Pocantico Hills After Long Illness
Big Standard Oil Fire:Mammoth Reservoir in California Burning -- Loss May Be $3,000,000
Elevated Car Jumps Track: Passengers Tossed About, but Not Hurt -- Road Blocked for Two Hours
Inquiry Into Egg Trust:Federal Officers Said to Have Undertaken it in Chicago
Treaty to End Tong War: It Will Be Signed To-day in the Chinese Consulate- Terms Unknown
Danbury, Conn., April 21 -- Samuel Langhorne Clemens, "Mark Twain," died at 22 minutes after 6 tonight. Beside him on the bed lay a beloved book- it was Carlyle's "French Revolution" -and near the book his glasses, pushed away with a weary sigh a few hours before. Too weak to speak clearly, "Give me my glasses," he had written on a piece of paper. He had received them, put them down, and sunk into unconsciousness from which he glided almost imperceptibly into death. He was in his seventy-fifth year.
For some time, his daughter Clara and her husband, Ossip Cabrilowitsch, and the humorist's biographer, Albert Bigelow Paine, had been by the bed waiting for the end, which Drs. Quintard and Halsey had seen to be a matter of minutes. The patient felt absolutely no pain at the end and the moment of his death was scarcely noticeable.
Death came, however, while his favorite niece, Mrs. E. E. Looms, and her husband, who is Vice President of the Delaware, Lackawanna & amp; Western Railway, and a nephew, Jervis Langdon, were on the way to the railroad station. They had left the house much encouraged by the fact that the sick man had recognized them, and took a train for New York ignorant of what happened later.
Hopes Aroused Yesterday
Although the end had been foreseen by the doctors and would not have been a shock at any time, the apparently strong rally of this morning had given basis for the hope that it would be postponed for several days. Mr. Clemens awoke at about 4 o'clock this morning after a few hours of the first natural sleep he has had for several days, and the nurses could see by the brightness of his eyes that his vitality had been considerably restored. He was able to raise his arms above his head and clasp them behind his neck with the first evidence of physical comfort he had given for a long time.
His strength seemed to increase enough to allow him to enjoy the sunrise, the first signs of which he could see out of the windows in the three sides of the room where he lay. The increasing sunlight seemed to bring ease to him, and by the time the family was about he was strong enough to sit up in bed and overjoyed them by recognizing all of them and speaking a few words to each. This was the first time that his mental powers had been fully his for nearly two days, with the exception of a few minutes early last evening, when he addressed a few sentences to his daughter.
Calls for His Book
For two hours he lay in bed enjoying the feeling of this return of strength. Then he made a movement asked in a faint voice for the copy of Carlyle's "French Revolution," which he has always had near him for the last year, and which he has read and re-read and brooded over.
The book was handed to him, and he lifted it up as if to read. Then a smile faintly illuminated his face when he realized that he was trying to read without his glasses. He tried to say, "Given me my glasses," but his voice failed, and the nurses bending over him could not understand. He motioned for a sheet of paper and a pencil, and wrote what he could not say.
With his glasses on he read a little and then slowly put the book down with a sigh. Soon he appeared to become drowsy and settled on his pillow. Gradually he sank and settled into a lethargy. Dr. Halsey appreciated that he could have been roused, but considered it better for him to rest. At 3 o'clock he went into complete unconsciousness.
Later Dr. Quintard, who had arrived from New York, held a consultation with Dr. Halsey, and it was decided that death was near. The family was called and gathered about the bedside watching in a silence which was long unbroken. It was the end. At twenty-two minutes past 6, with the sunlight just turning red as it stole into the window in perfect silence he breathed his last.
Died of a Broken Heart
The people of Redding, Bethel, and Danbury listened when they were told that the doctors said Mark Twain was dying of angina pectoris. But they say among themselves that he died of a broken heart. And this is a verdict not of popular sentiment alone. Albert Bigelow Paine, his biographer to be and literary executor, who has been constantly with him, said that for the last year at least Mr. Clemens had been weary of life. When Richard Watson Gilder died, he said: "How fortunate he is. No good fortune of that kind ever comes to me."
The man who has stood to the public for the greatest humorist this country has produced has in private life suffered overwhelming sorrows. The loss of an only son in infancy, a daughter in her teens and one in middle life, and finally of a wife who was a constant and sympathetic companion, has preyed upon his mind. The recent loss of his daughter Jean, who was closest to him in later years when her sister was abroad studying, was the final blow. On the heels of this came the first symptoms of the disease which was surely to be fatal and one of whose accompaniments is mental depression. Mr. Paine says that all heart went out of him and his work when his daughter Jean died. He has practically written nothing since he summoned his energies to write a last chapter memorial of her for his autobiography.
He told his biographer that the past Winter in Bermuda was gay but not happy. Bermuda is always gay in Winter and Mark Twain was a central figure in the gayety. He was staying at the home of William H. Allen. Even in Bermuda, however, Mr. Clemens found himself unable to write and finally relied on Mr. Allen's fifteen-year old daughter, Helen, to write the few letters he cared to send.
His health failed rapidly and finally Mr. Allen wrote to Albert Bigelow Paine that his friend was in a most serious condition. Mr. Paine immediately cabled to Mrs. Babrilowitsch, his surviving daughter, who was in Europe, and started himself on April 2 for Bermuda, embarking with the humorist for the return to New York immediately after his arrival. On the trip over Mark Twain became very much worse and finally realized his condition.
"It's a losing game," he said to his companion. "I'll never get home alive."
Mr. Clemens did manage to summon his strength, however, and in spite of being so weak that he had to be carried down the gangplank he survived the journey to his beautiful place at Redding. The first symptom of angina pectoris came last June when he went to Baltimore to address a young ladies school. In his room at the hotel he was suddenly taken with a terrible gripping at the heart. It soon passed away, however, and he was able to make an address with no inconvenience. The pains however, soon returned with more frequency and steadily grew worse until they became a constant torture.
One of the last acts of Mark Twain was to write out a check for $6,000 for the library in which the literary coterie settled near Redding have been interested for a year; fairs, musicales, and sociables having been held in order to raise the necessary amount. The library is to be a memorial to Jean Clemens, and will be built on a site about half a mile from Stormfield at ... Cross Roads.
It is certain to be recalled that Mark Twain was for more than fifty years an inveterate smoker, and the first conjecture of the layman would be that he had weakened his heart by overindulgence in tobacco. Dr. Halsey said to-night that he was unable to say that the angina pectoris from which Mark Twain died was in any way [related to] nicotine poisoning. Some constitutions, he said, seem immune from the effects of tobacco, and his was one of them. Yet it is true that since his illness began the doctors had cut down Mark Twain's daily allowance of twenty cigars and countless pipes to four cigars a day.
No deprivation was a greater sorrow to him. He tried to smoke on the steamer while returning from Bermuda, and only gave it up because he was too feeble to draw on his pipe. Even on his death bed when passed the point of speech, and it was no longer certain that his ideas were held, he would make the motion of waiving a cigar, and smiling expel empty air from under the mustache still stained with smoke.
Where Mark Twain chose to spend his declining years was the first outpost of Methodism in New England, and it was among the hills of Redding that Gen. Israel Putnam of Revolutionary fame mustered his sparse ranks. Putnam Park now incloses the memory of his camp.
Mark Twain first heard of it at the dipper given him on his seventeenth birthday, when a fellow-gaest who lived there mentioned its beauties and added that there was a vacant house adjoining his own, "I think you may buy that old house for me," said Mark Twain. Sherwood Place was the name of that old house, and where it stood Mark Twain reared the white walls of the Italian villa he first named Innocence at Home, but a first experience of what a New England Winter storm can be in its whitest fury quickly caused him to christen it anew Stormfield.
Where Mark Twain Died
The house had been thus described by Albert Bigelow Paine: "Set on a fair hillside with such a green slope below, such a view outspread across the valley as made one catch his breath a little when he first turned to look at it. A trout stream flows through one of the meadows. There are apple trees and gray stone walls. The entrance to it is a winding, [text unreadable] lane."
"Through this lane the 'Innocent at Home' loved to wander in his white flannels for homely gossip with the neighbors. They remember him best as one who above all things loved a good listening, for Mark Twain was a mighty talker, stored with fairy tales for the little maids he adored, and [text unreadable], ruder speech for more [text unreadable] masculine ears. It is a legend that he was vastly proud of his famous mop of white hair, and used to spend the pains of a court lady in getting it to just the proper stage of artistic disarray.
The burial will be in the family plot at Elmira, N.Y., where lie already his wife, his two daughters, Susan and Jean, and his infant son, Langhorne. No date has yet been set, as the family is still undecided whether or not there should be a public funeral first in New York City.
It is probable that Stormfield will be kept as a Summer place by Mrs. Gabrilowitsch, who is very fond both of the house, and the country, although her husband's musical engagements make it necessary that she spend a part of each year abroad.
Mr. Paine said to-night that Mark Twain had put his affairs in perfect order and that he died well off, though by no means a rich man. He leaves a considerable number of manuscripts, in all stages of incompleteness and of all characters, many of them begun years ago and put aside as unsatisfactory.
Mrs. Gabrilowitsch will aid Mr. Paine in the final decision as to what use shall be made of these.
Mark Twain's Career
Long Life, Struggles, and Achievements of Samuel Langhorne Clemens
Samuel Langhorne Clemens was considered the best-known American man of letters. Often he was referred to as the "Dean of American literature." He was known far beyond the boundaries where English is spoken as the greatest humorist and satirist living. His famous telegram to a newspaper publishing a report of his death, when happily it was intrigue, has been quoted and requoted almost everywhere. "The report of my death," he wired, "is greatly exaggerated."
The father of Mark Twain was John Marshall Clemens, who migrated from Virginia to Kentucky, and then on to Adair County, Tennessee, when a young man. There he married a young woman named Langhorne, who brought him family prestige and many broad acres. But with the prevalent spirit of unrest among pioneers, the couple crossed over into Missouri, settling at Florida, Monroe County, where, [text unreadable] their [text unreadable] famous son was born. Mark Twain's life, however, really did not begin until [text unreadable] years later, when the family moved to Hannibal, Marion County. Hannibal has been described many times as a typical river town of that day, a sleepy place, filled with drawling, lazy, picturesque inhabitants, black and white.
Young Clemens, so the record runs, went to school there and so also the record runs studied just as little as he could if he studied at all. He had been painted in that period of his career as an incorrigible truant, roaming the river banks and bluffs, watching the passing steamboats, and listening keenly to the trials that went on in the shabby office where the Justice of the Peace, his father, settled the disputes and punished the misdemeanors of his neighbors. In that period, while the ambition to be a pilot on the great river burned in him, was stored in his memory the material which in after years crystallized into "Tom Sawyer," "Huckleberry Finn," and "Pudd'nhead Wilson."
Mark Twain's school days ended when he was 12. The father died, leaving nothing behind save the reputation of being a good neighbor and an upright man and his children at once became bread winners. "Sam" was apprenticed as a printer at 50-cents a week in the office of The Hannibal Weekly Journal, doing as he afterward said, "a little of everything." After three years with a capital of a few dollars in his pocket, he became what was then a familiar sight, a wanderer from one printing office to another. About this period he paid his first visit to New York, having been drawn here by stories of a great exposition then in progress.
He worked here for a while, then moved on to Philadelphia, and later, obeying always the wandering instinct which finally carried him around the world and into all hands, to nearly all the larger cities of the South and West, including New Orleans. The trip down the river awakened the old desire to be a pilot, which had slumbered since the Hannibal days, and his career as a printer was ended. He paid in cash and promised $500 to a Mississippi pilot to take him on as an assistant and "teach him the river." He became a pilot and stuck to it until the outbreak of the civil war, earning $250 a month, but chief of all he got here his material for "Life on the Mississippi."
His experience as a Confederate soldier was brief and inglorious. Hardly had he enlisted before he was captured. Released on parole, he broke the parole and returned to the ranks, and soon was recaptured. He was in imminent peril, for recognition meant immediate and ignominious execution, but he got away, and determined never to take the risk again. He stopped flight only on reaching Nevada, where several letters of his to The Virginia City Enterprise resulted in an offer from the editor of that paper of a place on the staff. From that day forward Clemens earned his living with his pen, but with the exception of several excursions [text unreadable].
From Nevada, Mark Twain moved out to San Francisco where, after a brief service on the local staff of The Call, he was discharged as useless. Then he and Bret Harte were associated in the conduct of The Californian, but both soon deserted the paper to make their fortunes mining if they could. Neither did, and Mark Twain was soon back in San Francisco penniless and ill. This was in [text unreadable.] The Sacramento Union sent him to the Sandwich Islands to write a [text unreadable] of letters on the sugar trade- an arrangement which this time he filled to the editor's satisfaction- and returned restored to health.
That Winter, however, was one of "roughing it" for him. He could get little to do as reporter or editor, and finally took to lecturing in a small way. He was a success from the start. He spoke in many of the small towns of California and Nevada, earning more than a living, and meantime writing sketches for Eastern papers. These attracted considerable notice, and in March of 1867 he issued his first book, containing the "Jumping Frog" and other stories. Its reception was so cordial that Mark Twain decided to try his fortunes in the East. On reaching New York he learned that a secret excursion was about to start for the Holy Land in the steamer Quaker City. He persuaded the Alta California, for which he had been writing, to advance him the price of the ticket for this trip - [text unreadable]- to be paid in letters at $15 each. He made his trip, which proved the beginning of his fortune, for "Innocents Abroad," his first famous book, had taken shape in his mind before his return.
To write the book, however, and to live at the same time was a problem, but Senator W. M. Stewart of Nevada, becoming interested in the project, obtained for him a six-dollar-a-day committee clerkship, while the work was "farmed" out to another man at $100 a month.
"Innocents Abroad" Instant Success
The book was finished in August, 1868, but a publisher was hard to find. At last, the American Publishing Company of Hartford agreed to issue it. Its success was instant and overwhelming. Edition after edition was sold in such rapid succession that the presses could not turn them out fast enough. Mark Twain had become a man of note over night.
Among Mark Twain's friends on the Holy Land trip had been Judge Jervis J. Langdon of Elmira, N.Y., and his two children, Dan of the "Innocents" and Lizzie. Mark Twain fell in love with the latter, and it was said afterward that his desire to be near her led him to accept editorial connection in 1869 with the Buffalo Express. But Judge Langdon, who was rich, did not at first favor the union of his daughter and the nearly penniless journalist, and Miss Langdon twice rejected him. He sought a wife as he had sought a publisher, and his third proposal was accepted. His father-in-law gave him a handsome home in Buffalo, but the young couple remained there but a year, going to Hartford where they lived for many years and where Mark Twain did perhaps his most ... work... [unreadable.]
His Fortune Swept Away
Two years later the firm failed and Mark Twain's fortune was swept away. With courage as unbroken as when he could not get a job as reporter in San Francisco many years before he again took to the lecture field to regain his fortunes.
He received generous offers to go on tour and everywhere was greeted by large and enthusiastic audiences. He made a new fortune, paid his debts, as Sir Walter Scott had done and left the publishing business to others while he worked hard at his desk as ever. In 1896 appeared "The Personal Recollections of Joan of Arc", "More Tramps Abroad" and "Following the Equator in 1897 and "The Man Who Corrupted Hadleyburg," 1900. After an extended trip to Europe he published in 1902 "A Double-barreled Detective Story," and in recent years, besides writing frequently for magazines, particularly the Harper publications, the Harper Brothers having been his publishers for the last decade or more, he had been engaged with Albert Bigelow Paine, his literary assistant, in writing his autobiography. Much of it has already been published. It was estimated three years ago that he had then written 250,000 words, and was still turning out something like 1,000 a day, when he worked.
Mark Twain had outlived most of his family. His wife died some years ago and on the morning before Christmas, last year, his daughter, Miss Jean Clemens, was drowned in a bathtub in their home at Redding, Conn. Broken himself, in health, and utterly crushed by this sudden affliction, he wrote on that day: "She was all that I had left, except Clara, who married Mr. Gabrilowitsch lately, and has just arrived in Europe."
In 1905 Mark Twain celebrated his seventieth birthday with a notable gathering of literary folk. Two years later he was honored by Oxford University with the degree of Doctor of Laws. Though in his younger days he was a great traveler, and was known personally to nearly all the crowned heads of Europe, of late years he had confined his journeys chiefly to Bermuda, whither he was often accompanied by one of his best friends, the late H. H. Rogers, as long as he lived. In nearly all his public appearances in the last five years he had worn white flannel, and even had a dress suit, claw-hammer and all, made of this soft white material, whose evident cleanliness appealed so strongly to him.
Twain as Printer's Devil
His Own Stories of His Exploits in Boyhood as Acting Editor
One of the most interesting of all Mark Twain's books or series of personal sketches relate to the crucial, but happy-go-lucky period of his life. At 12 he began on his own account. He has told this characteristic story of his first literary venture, when the "devil" got out the paper.
"I was a very smart child at the age of 13- an unusually smart child, I thought at the time. It was then that I did my first newspaper scribbling, and most unexpectedly to me, it stirred up a fine sensation in the community. It did, indeed, and I was very proud of it, too. I was a 'devil' in a printing office, and a progressive and aspiring one. My uncle had me on his paper, (the Weekly Hannibal Journal, $2 a year, in advance- 500 subscribers, and they paid in cordwood, cabbages, and unmarketable turnips.) and on a lucky Summer day he left town to be gone a week, and asked me if I thought I could edit one issue of the paper judiciously. Ah, didn't I want to try! Higgins was the editor on the rival paper. He had been jilted, and one night a friend found an open note on the poor fellow's bed, in which he stated that he could no longer endure life and had drowned himself in Bear Creek.
"The friend ran down there and found Higgins wading back to shore. He had concluded he wouldn't. The village was full of it for a few days, but Higgins' did not suspect it. I thought this was a fine opportunity. I wrote an elaborately wretched account of the whole matter, and then illustrated it with villainous cuts engraved on the bottoms of wood type with a jackknife- one of them a picture of Higgins wading out into the creek in his shirt, with a lantern, sounding the depth of the water with a walking stick.
"Next I gently touched up the newest stranger, the lion of the day, the gorgeous journeyman tailor from Quincy. He was a simpering coxcomb of the first water, and the "loudest" dressed man in the State. He was an inveterate woman killer. Every week he wrote lushy 'poetry' for The Journal about his newest conquest. His rhymes for my week were headed, 'To Mary in H-1,' meaning to Mary in Hannibal, of course. But while setting up the piece I was suddenly riven from head to heel with what I regarded as a prefect thunderbolt of humor, and I compressed it into a snappy footnote at the bottom thus:
"'We will let this thing pass, just this once, but we wish Mr. J. Gordon Runnels to understand distinctly that we have a character to sustain, and from this time forth when he wants to commune with his friends in h-1, he must select some other medium than the columns of this journal.'
"The paper came out, and I never knew any little thing to attract so much attention as those playful trifles of mine. For once the Hannibal Journal was in demand- a novelty it had not experienced before. The whole town was stirred. Higgins dropped in with a double-barreled shotgun early in the forenoon. When he found that it was an infant (as he called me) that had done him the damage, he simply pulled my ears and went away, but he threw up the situation that night and left town."
Associate Editor of Morning Glory
On the advice of a physician, Mark Twain said he went South shortly after his week as "devil" and editor in chief in one, landing finally as associate editor on the Morning Glory and Johnson County [text unreadable], Tennessee. He gave this description of his "chief":
"When I went on duty I found the chief editor sitting tilted back in a three-legged chair with his feet on a pine table. There was another pine table in the room and another afflicted chair, and both were half buried under newspapers and scraps and sheets of manuscript. There was a wooden box of sand, sprinkled with cigar stubs and old soldiers, and a stove with its door hanging by its upper hinge. The chief editor had a long black cloth frock coat on and white linen pants. His boots were small and neatly blacked. He wore a ruffled shirt, a large seal ring, a standing collar of obsolete pattern, and checkered neck kerchief with ends hanging down. He told me to take the exchanges and skim through them and write up the 'Script of the Tennessee Press.' I wrote as follows:
"'The editors of The Semi-Weekly Earthquake evidently labor under a mistaken apprehension with regard to the Ballyhack Railroad. It is not the object of the company to leave Buzzardville off to one side, on the contrary, they consider it one of the most important points along the line, and consequently can have no desire to slight it. The gentlemen of The Earthquake will, of course, take pleasure in making the correction.'
"I passed my manuscript over to the chief editor for acceptance, alteration, or destruction.
"'Thunder and lightning,' he exclaimed. 'Do you suppose I am going to speak of those cattle that way? Do you suppose my subscribers are going to stand such gruel as that? Give me the pen.'"
"While he was in the midst of his work somebody shot at him through the open window and marred the symmetry of my ear.
"'Ah,' said he, 'that is that scoundrel Smith of the Moral Volcano; he was due yesterday.' And he snatched a navy revolver from his belt and fired. Smith dropped, shot through the thigh. The shot spoiled Smith's aim, who was taking a second chance, and he crippled a stranger. It was me. Merely a finger was shot off.
"'Now, here's the way this stuff ought to be written,' said the chief editor.
"I took the manuscript. It was scarred with erasures and interlineations till its mother wouldn't have known it if it had had one. It now reads as follows:
"The inveterate liars of the Semi-Weekly Earthquake are evidently endeavoring to palm off upon a noble and chivalrous people another of their vile and brutal falsehoods with regard to the most glorious conception of the nineteenth century, the Ballyhack Railroad. The idea that Buzzardville was to be left off at one side originated in their own fulsome brains- or rather, in the settlings which they regard as brains. They had better swallow this lie if they want to save their abandoned reptile carcasses the cowhiding they so richly deserve."
Mark Twain says he had written this way of the editor of an "esteemed contemporary":
"John W. Blossom, Esq., the able editor of the Higginsville Thunderbolt and Battle Cry of Freedom arrived in the city yesterday. He is stopping at the Van Buren House."
His chief editor changed it to read:
"That ass, Blossom, of the Higginsville Thunderbolt and Battle Cry of Freedom is down here again sponging at the Van Buren."
"Now, that is the way to write," he said, "peppery and to the point. Mush-and-milk journalism gives me the fantods."
Blow to His Friends Here
New York Editors and Authors Extol the Man and the Writer
The news of Samuel L. Clemens death shocked all his friends and literary associates with its suddenness. Although it had been known that he was in a serious condition, no one seemed to expect that his illness would terminate fatally so soon.
E. Hopkinson Smith, who has known Mr. Clemens for thirty years- ever since, in fact, the great humorist first came to this city and lectured at Cooper Union, -was dining at the home of Mr. and Mrs. George Clark at 1,027 Fifth Avenue when he first heard of Clemen's death.
"It does not seem possible that Sam is dead," said Mr. Smith. "We had been friends ever since he first came from San Francisco and gave his readings of 'The Jumping Frog' on the lecture platform. He had the kindest heart in the world. The reading public knew him more for his humor. But his friends knew him as a big-hearted, human man. His attitude toward everyone was the kindest. In live and in art it was always the human that appealed to him most. The humor of his books was the real, the genuine humor. Humor to be lasting, must be clean. Clemens humor was essentially clean. It will be lasting for that reason. It was the humor of human nature. There was never anywhere in it any double entendre. It was always kindly. It never ridiculed anyone. It never made fun of the littleness of men. Twain did not make fun of Tom Sawyer painting the back yard fence. He brought out the human note in the boy. And that's what makes us always remember that passage with joy and read it over and over."
Col. George M. Harvey of Harper & amp; Brothers, who was Mr. Clemens's publisher, is abroad. But Henry M. Alden, editor of Harper's, at his home in Metuchen, N.J., last night spoke with emotion of the man who had been not only a contributor, but a friend.
"In Mr. Clemens's death I have lost a dear friend," Mr. Alden said. "I feel a deep sense of personal loss. And I can't express my sense of the loss to literature. As for our personal relations, they were much more than those of editor and contributor. Nobody could tell anything about Mark Twain better than he could tell it himself-or; indeed, half so well. He has always been writing his autobiography, I have always believed that literature has lost much by not having had more of his imaginative creations on a higher plane- more works like 'Joan of Arc,' for example."
Mr. Alden has published his personal recollections of Mr. Clemens in The Book News Monthly for April.
"Mark Twain was, with one exception, the best-known American of his time, and, without exception, outside of Poe and the New England school, he was our most distinguished writer," said Robert Underwood Johnson, of the Century. "He had the singular distinction of having, so to speak, naturalized American humor in many lands. This, it seems to me, was due to the fact that his humor was not greatly dependent on difficult dialects, but on large underlying ideas and on a keen appreciation of human nature, and on a skillful use of the incongruous.
"In dramatic effect, in surprise, and in climax he was unequaled and inexhaustible. I think that these things are likely to give more than usual permanency to his writings. We have outgrown many once popular humorists. But I can't conceive of a generation of readers to whom, on the whole, his work will not be of enjoyable interest. While literally he has added to the gayety of nations and made us all his debtors, he has also in his serious work, revealed an admirable and tender sympathy for children and a chivalry toward the oppressed. So much has he become a part of our lives that it is difficult to think of a world without Mark Twain."
His Countrymen's Tributes
Express Deep Sense of What Mark Twain Means to Americans
Mark Twain's death has meant to Americans everywhere and in all walks of life what the death of no other American could have meant. His personality and his humor have been an integral part of American life for so long that it has seemed almost impossible to realize an America without him. Something of this feeling is expressed in the tributes to his memory which, following hard upon his end, have come from all parts of the country. Some of these tributes are printed below:
William Lyon Phelps, Professor of English Literature at Yale University: "The death of Mark Twain is a very great loss to American letters. I regarded him as our foremost representative in literature at the present day. "Tom Sawyer" and "Huckleberry Finn," his two masterpieces, will live for many years as illustrative of a certain phase of American life."
Col. Thomas Wentworth of Higginson in Boston: "It is impossible to exaggerate the loss to the country."
Mrs. Julia Ward Howe, now in her ninety-first year, in Boston: "The news of Mark Twain's death will be sad to many people. He was personally highly esteemed and much beloved; a man of letters with a very genuine gift of humor and of serious thought as well."
Handin Garland, novelist, in Chicago: "Mark Twain's death marks the exit of a literary man who was as distinctly American as was Walt Whitman. The work of most writers could be produced in any country, but I think we, as well as everybody in foreign lands will look upon Twain's work as being as closely related to this country as the Mississippi River itself. We who knew him personally hardly need to speak of him as a man, for all the world knew him. No one ever heard him speak without being inspired, and no one ever saw him without being proud of him."
George Ade, at Kentland, Ind: "I read every line Twain wrote, for he was a kind of literary god to me. His influence has already worked itself into the literature of our day. We owe much of our cheerfulness, simplicity, and hope to him. Most of all, Twain grew old beautifully, showing his simple, childlike faith for ultimate success throughout all his adversities."
Booth Tarkington, at Indianapolis: "He seemed to me the greatest prose writer we had, and beyond that a great man. His death is a National loss, but we have the consolation that he and his genius belonged to and were of us."
Charles Major, at Indianapolis: "He created a new school of humor, the purpose of which was not only to be funny but to be true. He could write nothing that he did not at least feel to be true. All that he wrote was half fun and whole earnest."
James Whitcomb Riley: "The world has lost not only a genius, but a man of striking character, of influence, and of boundless resources. He knew the human heart and he was sincere. He knew children, and this knowledge made him tender."

Os escandinavos ja nao sao mais o que eram (nem deveriam...)

Há muito tempo que os mitos em torno da suposta maravilha do "modelo social" escandinavo -- taxação pesada, em troca de benefícios sociais extensos -- já foram desmistificados, e mesmo o fato de que eles existem, e são elogiados por alguns economistas (sobretudo no Brasil, onde também tem gente que pretende construir uma nação de assistidos, com cinco vezes menos renda per capita e uma produtividade inferior de igual proporção), isso não representa garantia de possam continuar para sempre, numa situação demográfica e social cambiante.
Melhor consertar preventivamente, e consensualmente, antes que o modelo desmorone, face ao enorme desequilíbrio econômico que ele provoca.
No Brasil tem gente que ainda não percebeu que ele é inviável, sobretudo nas nossas condições...
Paulo Roberto de Almeida


Danes Rethink a Welfare State Ample to a Fault

Jan Grarup for The New York Times
Robert Nielsen, 45, said proudly last year that he had basically been on welfare since 2001.
  • FACEBOOK
  • TWITTER
  • GOOGLE+
  • SAVE
  • E-MAIL
  • SHARE
  • PRINT
  • REPRINTS
COPENHAGEN — It began as a stunt intended to prove that hardship and poverty still existed in this small, wealthy country, but it backfired badly. Visit a single mother of two on welfare, a liberal member of Parliament goaded a skeptical political opponent, see for yourself how hard it is.
World Twitter Logo.

Connect With Us on Twitter

Follow@nytimesworldfor international breaking news and headlines.
It turned out, however, that life on welfare was not so hard. The 36-year-old single mother, given the pseudonym “Carina” in the news media, had more money to spend than many of the country’s full-time workers. All told, she was getting about $2,700 a month, and she had been on welfare since she was 16.
In past years, Danes might have shrugged off the case, finding Carina more pitiable than anything else. But even before her story was in the headlines 16 months ago, they were deeply engaged in a debate about whether their beloved welfare state, perhaps Europe’s most generous, had become too rich, undermining the country’s work ethic. Carina helped tip the scales.
With little fuss or political protest — or notice abroad — Denmark has been at work overhauling entitlements, trying to prod Danes into working more or longer or both. While much of southern Europe has been racked by strikes and protests as its creditors force austerity measures, Denmark still has a coveted AAA bond rating.
But Denmark’s long-term outlook is troubling. The population is aging, and in many regions of the country people without jobs now outnumber those with them.
Some of that is a result of a depressed economy. But many experts say a more basic problem is the proportion of Danes who are not participating in the work force at all — be they dawdling university students, young pensioners or welfare recipients like Carina who lean on hefty government support.
“Before the crisis there was a sense that there was always going to be more and more,” Bjarke Moller, the editor in chief of publications for Mandag Morgen, a research group in Copenhagen. “But that is not true anymore. There are a lot of pressures on us right now. We need to be an agile society to survive.”
The Danish model of government is close to a religion here, and it has produced a population that regularly claims to be among the happiest in the world. Even the country’s conservative politicians are not suggesting getting rid of it.
Denmark has among the highest marginal income-tax rates in the world, with the top bracket of 56.5 percent kicking in on incomes of more than about $80,000. But in exchange, the Danes get a cradle-to-grave safety net that includes free health care, a free university education and hefty payouts to even the richest citizens.
Parents in all income brackets, for instance, get quarterly checks from the government to help defray child-care costs. The elderly get free maid service if they need it, even if they are wealthy.
But few experts here believe that Denmark can long afford the current perks. So Denmark is retooling itself, tinkering with corporate tax rates, considering new public sector investments and, for the long term, trying to wean more people — the young and the old — off government benefits.
“In the past, people never asked for help unless they needed it,” said Karen Haekkerup, the minister of social affairs and integration, who has been outspoken on the subject. “My grandmother was offered a pension and she was offended. She did not need it.
“But now people do not have that mentality. They think of these benefits as their rights. The rights have just expanded and expanded. And it has brought us a good quality of life. But now we need to go back to the rights and the duties. We all have to contribute.”
In 2012, a little over 2.6 million people between the ages of 15 and 64 were working in Denmark, 47 percent of the total population and 73 percent of the 15- to 64-year-olds.
While only about 65 percent of working age adults are employed in the United States, comparisons are misleading, since many Danes work short hours and all enjoy perks like long vacations and lengthy paid maternity leaves, not to speak of a de facto minimum wage approaching $20 an hour. Danes would rank much lower in terms of hours worked per year.
In addition, the work force has far more older people to support. About 18 percent of Denmark’s population is over 65, compared with 13 percent in the United States.
One study, by the municipal policy research group Kora, recently found that only 3 of Denmark’s 98 municipalities will have a majority of residents working in 2013. This is a significant reduction from 2009, when 59 municipalities could boast that a majority of residents had jobs. (Everyone, including children, was counted in the comparison.)
Joachim B. Olsen, the skeptical politician from the Liberal Alliance party who visited Carina 16 months ago in her pleasant Copenhagen apartment, is particularly alarmed. He says Sweden, which is already considered generous, has far fewer citizens living on government benefits. If Denmark followed Sweden’s example, it would have about 250,000 fewer people living on benefits of various sorts.
“The welfare state here has spiraled out of control,” Mr. Olsen said. “It has done a lot of good, but we have been unwilling to talk about the negative side. For a very long time it has been taboo to talk about the Carinas.”
Already the government has reduced various early-retirement plans. The unemployed used to be able to collect benefits for up to four years. Now it is two.
Students are next up for cutbacks, most intended to get them in the work force faster. Currently, students are entitled to six years of stipends, about $990 a month, to complete a five-year degree which, of course, is free. Many of them take even longer to finish, taking breaks to travel and for internships before and during their studies.
In trying to reduce the welfare rolls, the government is concentrating on making sure that people like Carina do not exist in the future. It is proposing cuts to welfare grants for those under 30 and stricter reviews to make sure that such recipients are steered into jobs or educational programs before they get comfortable on government benefits.
Officials have also begun to question the large number of people who are receiving lifetime disability checks. About 240,000 people — roughly 9 percent of the potential work force — have lifetime disability status; about 33,500 of them are under 40. The government has proposed ending that status for those under 40, unless they have a mental or physical condition that is so severe that it keeps them from working.
Instead of offering disability, the government intends to assign individuals to “rehabilitation teams” to come up with one- to five-year plans that could include counseling, social-skills training and education as well as a state-subsidized job, at least in the beginning. The idea is to have them working at least part time, or studying.
It remains possible that the cost-cutting push will hurt the left-wing coalition that leads the government. By and large, though, the changes have passed easily in Parliament and been happily endorsed by conservatives like Mr. Olsen, who does his best to keep his meeting with Carina in the headlines.
Carina was not the only welfare recipient to fuel the sense that Denmark’s system has somehow gotten out of kilter. Robert Nielsen, 45, made headlines last September when he was interviewed on television, admitting that he had basically been on welfare since 2001.
Mr. Nielsen said he was able-bodied but had no intention of taking a demeaning job, like working at a fast-food restaurant. He made do quite well on welfare, he said. He even owns his own co-op apartment.
Unlike Carina, who will no longer give interviews, Mr. Nielsen, called “Lazy Robert” by the news media, seems to be enjoying the attention. He says that he is greeted warmly on the street all the time. “Luckily, I am born and live in Denmark, where the government is willing to support my life,” he said.
Some Danes say the existence of people like Carina and Mr. Nielsen comes as no surprise. Lene Malmberg, who lives in Odsherred and works part time as a secretary despite a serious brain injury that has affected her short-term memory, said the Carina story was not news to her. At one point, she said, before her accident when she worked full time, her sister was receiving benefits and getting more money than she was.
“The system is wrong somehow, I agree,” she said. “I wanted to work. But she was a little bit: ‘Why work?’ ”
Anna-Katarina Gravgaard contributed reporting.
A version of this article appeared in print on April 21, 2013, on page A1 of the New York editionwith the headline: Danes Rethink A Welfare State Ample to a Fault.

Paraguai: entre o ferro e a bigorna - Le Monde (Blog Amériques)



Paraguay, une si fragile démocratie

LE MONDE GEO ET POLITIQUE |  • Mis à jour le 
Par 
Abonnez-vous
à partir de 1 €
 Réagir Classer Imprimer Envoyer
Partager   google + linkedin

A Capiata (Paraguay), le 5 avril, des partisans de Horacio Cartes, le candidat du Parti Colorado (droite) pour l'élection présidentielle du 21 avril.

Un an après la destitution expéditive du président Fernando Lugo, ancien "évêque des pauvres", des élections générales auront lieu le 21 avril au Paraguay. Quelque 3,6 millions d'électeurs désigneront le président, le vice-président, 45 sénateurs, 80 députés et 17 gouverneurs de départements. Ils seront tous élus pour un mandat de cinq ans. Onze candidats sont en lice pour la présidence. Le prochain président prendra ses fonctions le 15 août.

Pour la première fois de leur histoire, les Paraguayens qui ont émigré - en grande majorité en Argentine - pourront voter dans leur pays de résidence.
QUEL EST LE CLIMAT POLITIQUE À L'APPROCHE DU SCRUTIN ?
Le président Fernando Lugo a été brutalement démis de ses fonctions dix mois seulement avant la fin de son mandat, révélant ainsi la fragilité de la démocratie paraguayenne. Sa destitution a été votée le 22 juin 2012, à la quasi-unanimité, à la suite d'un procès expéditif mené en quelques heures par le Congrès. Comme le prévoit la Constitution, c'est le vice-président, Federico Franco, du Parti libéral radical authentique (PLRA), ancien allié de M. Lugo, qui a été chargé d'assurerl'intérim jusqu'aux élections du 21 avril.
La victoire de Fernando Lugo à la présidentielle de 2008, avec 40,8 % des voix, à la tête d'une coalition de centre gauche, avait suscité de grands espoirs. C'était un tournant historique qui mettait fin à soixante et un ans d'hégémonie du Parti Colorado (droite). M. Lugo a accepté de se retirer, en 2012, tout en dénonçant "un coup d'Etat express" qui "meurtrit le Paraguay et sa démocratie".
Il a été accusé d'avoir "négligé ses fonctions" à la suite de la mort de 17 personnes au cours de violents affrontements entre des paysans et des forces de la police à Curuguaty, le 15 juin 2012. Cet épisode traumatisant pour le pays n'a jamais été éclairci. M. Lugo avait alors limogé le chef de la police et le ministre de l'intérieur, appartenant au PLRA, entraînant une rupture avec ses alliés au gouvernement.
Sans majorité au Congrès, sans espace politique propre et sans le soutien de la presse, M. Lugo n'a pas tenu ses promesses, en particulier une réforme agraire et une meilleure redistribution des terres (1 % des propriétaires terriens détiennent 77 % des terres cultivables). En dépit d'une croissance de 5,6 % en moyenne entre 2006 et 2010, les inégalités sociales demeurent fortes, même si M. Lugo a réalisé des investissements inédits dans l'histoire du pays dans la santé et l'éducation. Au Paraguay, où 90 % de la population est catholique, sa popularité a en outre été ternie par plusieurs demandes de reconnaissance d'enfants conçus alors que Mgr Lugo portait encore la soutane.
QUELS SONT LES GRANDS RAPPORTS DE FORCE POLITIQUES ?
Depuis des mois, Horacio Cartes, du Parti Colorado, était donné grand gagnant. Mais au cours des dernières semaines, le candidat libéral, Efrain Alegre, est remonté dans les sondages après avoir conclu une alliance avec des membres du parti nationaliste Unace, du défunt général putschiste Lino Oviedo, qui était candidat à la présidence.
Populaire pour avoir obtenu, en 1989, la reddition du dictateur Alfredo Stroessner, Lino Oviedo est mort, le 3 février, dans un accident d'hélicoptère dont les causes n'ont pas été élucidées. Son neveu, qui porte le même nom, Lino Cesar Oviedo, l'a remplacé comme candidat de l'Unace.
Arrive loin derrière, en troisième position dans les sondages, Mario Ferreiro, ancien journaliste de la télévision, initialement soutenu par l'ex-président Lugo mais qui a décidé de se présenter à la tête d'une nouvelle formation, Avance pays. Le candidat de l'ancien président Lugo est désormais Anibal Carillo Iramain, du front de gaucheGuasu ("Front élargi", en guarani), qui regroupe une dizaine d'organisations sociales et paysannes.
A 61 ans, M. Lugo, qui souffre d'un cancer lymphatique, se présente à un poste de sénateur. La Constitution ne lui permet pas de briguer un second mandat consécutif.
La gauche est affaiblie par de profondes luttes internes et ne recueille qu'environ 3 % des intentions de vote. Tout indique un retour de l'hégémonie historique des deux formations traditionnelles de droite, le Colorado et le Parti libéral.
DANS QUEL ÉTAT SE TROUVE L'ÉCONOMIE ?
Le poids de l'agriculture dans le produit intérieur brut (PIB) est l'un des plus importants d'Amérique latine. Les principales ressources sont la viande et le soja, dont le Paraguay est le 4e exportateur et 6e producteur mondial. L'autre richesse provient de la production d'électricité hydraulique grâce aux barrages binationaux d'Itaipu, avec le Brésil, et de Yacireta, avec l'Argentine.
L'économie informelle représente près de 40 % du PIB et les transferts des revenus des émigrés, 5 % du PIB. Plus d'un million de Paraguayens vivent en dehors de leur pays et envoient de l'argent à leurs familles pour un montant annuel estimé à 700 millions de dollars.
Avec un territoire enclavé entre l'Argentine, le Brésil et la Bolivie, sans accès à la mer, le Paraguay est dépendant de ses grands voisins, en particulier du Brésil. Le Paraguay revend à ce pays 80 % de l'électricité produite par le barrage binational d'Itaipu. La renégociation des prix de vente au Brésil, en 2008, a permis au Paraguay de tripler ses recettes.
Entre 300 000 et 500 000 Brésiliens cultivent d'immenses exploitations de soja transgénique dans l'est du Paraguay. Cette concentration de terres entraîne une émigration croissante des paysans "sans terre" vers les villes, où ils vivent dans l'indigence. Le Paraguay est l'un des pays les plus pauvres d'Amérique latine.
QUEL EST L'ENJEU DIPLOMATIQUE DE CES ÉLECTIONS ?
La campagne électorale a eu lieu dans le calme. Compte tenu de l'importance du bon déroulement du processus électoral pour la normalisation des relations diplomatiques du Paraguay, marginalisé après la destitution de Fernando Lugo, quelque 400 observateurs internationaux - et pour la première fois de l'Union européenne - sont attendus à Asuncion, la capitale.
Le Paraguay est plus que jamais isolé dans la région. Il a été suspendu du Marché commun sud-américain (Mercosur) et de l'Union des nations sud-américaines (Unasur) en attendant le rétablissement de la démocratie. Sa réintégration au sein du Mercosur risque de susciter la polémique car le Paraguay s'était opposé à l'adhésion du Venezuela, que les autres membres ont accepté, en son absence, en juin 2012.

Cursos universitarios 'a distancia: diferenca entre teoria e pratica (NYT)

Em lugar de ficar teorizando sobre a qualidade (ou falta de) dos cursos à distância, este pesquisador escolheu fazer um e verificar os méritos (e deméritos) de cada faceta ou aspecto do curso.
Um artigo interessante, embora no Brasil a prática possa ser bastante diferente do que deveria orientar a teoria...
Paulo Roberto de Almeida


OPINION

Two Cheers for Web U!

Ana Albero
I LEARNED many fascinating things while taking a series of free online college courses over the last few months. In my history class, I learned there was a Japanese political plot to assassinate Charlie Chaplin in 1932. In my genetics class, I learned that the ability to wiggle our ears is a holdover from animal ancestors who could shift the direction of their hearing organs.
Ana Albero

Readers’ Comments

Share your thoughts.
But the first thing I learned? When it comes to Massive Open Online Courses, like those offered by CourseraUdacityand edX, you can forget about the Socratic method.
The professor is, in most cases, out of students’ reach, only slightly more accessible than the pope or Thomas Pynchon. Several of my Coursera courses begin by warning students not to e-mail the professor. We are told not to “friend” the professor on Facebook. If you happen to see the professor on the street, avoid all eye contact (well, that last one is more implied than stated). There are, after all, often tens of thousands of students and just one top instructor.
Perhaps my modern history professor, Philip D. Zelikow, of the University of Virginia, put it best in his course introduction, explaining that his class would be a series of “conversations in which we’re going to talk about this course one to one” — except that one side (the student’s) doesn’t “get to talk back directly.” I’m not sure this fits the traditional definition of a conversation.
On the other hand, how can I really complain? I’m getting Ivy League (or Ivy League equivalent) wisdom free. Anyone can, whether you live in South Dakota or Senegal, whether it’s noon or 5 a.m., whether you’re broke or a billionaire. Professors from Harvard, M.I.T. and dozens of other schools prerecord their lectures; you watch them online and take quizzes at your leisure.
The MOOC classrooms are growing at Big Bang rates: more than five million students worldwide have registered for classes in topics ranging from physics to history to aboriginal worldviews.
It creates a strange paradox: these professors are simultaneously the most and least accessible teachers in history. And it’s not the only tension inherent in MOOCs.
MOOC boosters tend to speak of these global online classes as if they are the greatest educational advancement since the Athenian agora, highlighting their potential to lift millions of people out of poverty. Skeptics — including the blogger and University of California, Berkeley, doctoral studentAaron Bady — worry that MOOCs will offer a watered-down education, give politicians an excuse to gut state school budgets, and harm less prestigious colleges and universities.
To see for myself, I signed up for 11 courses. The bulk were on Coursera, which was founded in 2011 by two computer science professors at Stanford and financed by John Doerr, the famed Silicon Valley venture capitalist, among others — but I also dabbled with courses sponsored by edX and Udacity. Here, my report card on the current state of MOOCs.
THE PROFESSORS: B+
With the exception of a couple of clunkers — my plodding nutrition professor might want to drink more organic coffee before class — most of my MOOC teachers were impressive: knowledgeable, organized and well respected in their field. They were also, to the best of their abilities, entertaining. My genetics professor, at one point, used a Charles Darwin bobblehead doll as a puppet, and my philosophy professor wore steampunk goggles when talking about the logic of time travel. A for effort, folks.
I learned something new almost every lecture — ah, so that’s what a Nash equilibrium is — even if I forgot it a day later, which I often did.
My fellow students occasionally trashed the teachers on Facebook (“ludicrous!” one wrote about a philosophy lecture), but for the most part, they seemed to like them. Sometimes, they really liked them. The discussion boards about the professors often read like a tween’s One Direction fan site.
“I think my boyfriend is jealous of how charmed I am by the professor,” wrote one of Mr. Zelikow’s students on a discussion thread devoted to his endearing smile. Another added, it’s gotten to the point where “when I read things and give them a voice, instead of giving them the default Morgan Freeman voice, it is now the prof’s.”
On my philosophy discussion board, a student gave some deep thought to our professor’s supercool sweater.
The pop star analogy is not trivial. While MOOCs are a great equalizer when it comes to students around the world, they are a great unequalizer when it comes to teachers.
MOOCs are creating a breed of A-list celebrity professors who have lopsided sway over the landscape of ideas. I pity the offline teachers. I fear one of the casualties of these online courses might be the biodiversity of the academic ecosystem.
CONVENIENCE: A
MOOCs shift control to the student. I watched lectures while striding on my treadmill, while riding a train, while eating a spinach salad. I watched them on double-speed when my slow-talking cosmology professor lectured, and on three-fourths speed when my British epistemology professor tommy-gunned out his syllables. I gave up binge-viewing of “Homeland” Season 2 and instead dove into game theory. I paused to inspect whether my scientific literacy professor really wrote the word “pecision” instead of “precision” on the whiteboard. He did. I tried not to feel smug.
As my digression-loving finance professor, Gautam Kaul, of the University of Michigan’s Ross School of Business, aptly put it: “I’m hyper. I’m nuts ... The good news is, you can always skip parts you don’t enjoy. Whereas if you were in the class you’d have to suffer me throughout.”
Regardless of the convenience, you still have to carve out time for the lectures. Which is one reason the dropout rate for MOOCs is notoriously high: Coursera’s bioelectricity course, taught by a Duke professor, saw an astounding 97 percent of students fail to finish. My dropout rate was lower, but only a bit. I signed up for 11 courses, and finished 2: “Introduction to Philosophy” and “The Modern World: Global History since 1760.” (Well, to be honest, I’m not quite done with history — I’m still stuck in the 1980s.) Not coincidentally, these were two courses with lighter workloads and less jargon.
Problem is, there’s no cost to quitting, no social stigma for short-term dabbling. Perhaps they need a virtual dunce cap.
TEACHER-TO-STUDENT INTERACTION: D
As I mentioned, I had little to no contact with the professors. Not that I didn’t try. I entered a lottery to join an exclusive 10-person Google hangout with my genetics professor, the Duke University biologist Mohamed A. Noor. I lost. My cosmology professor, S. George Djorgovski, of Caltech, held office hours on Second Life, the virtual world. But the professor told those of us who were Second Life virgins that we might not want to bother, since the software is complicated.
A handful of lucky students got responses from professors on the discussion boards, and a few handfuls more from teaching assistants. I was not among them. Perhaps I should have been more solicitous, like the student who offered to send one flu-ridden instructor camomile tea. The professor gamely responded that whiskey kills more bacteria.
For MOOCs to fulfill their potential, Coursera and its competitors will have to figure out how to make teachers and teaching assistants more reachable. More like local pastors, less like deities on high. To their credit, the MOOC providers seem aware of the problem and are experimenting with fixes, like recruiting experienced students to guide discussions.
Some reformers have suggested an online-offline hybrid model. Students in, say, Ecuador, could gather in a Quito classroom, watch the MOOC lectures on video, and then have a local teacher facilitate a discussion. As I learned in my science literacy course, it’s hard to predict what will work in the real world, but this seems worth testing.
STUDENT-TO-STUDENT INTERACTION: B-
As psychologists will tell you, if you don’t talk about what you’ve learned, the knowledge will evaporate. With MOOCs, there is no shortage of ways to connect with other students: Facebook, Google Plus, Skype, Twitter, Coursera discussion boards — even shutting your laptop and meeting a classmate in a three-dimensional Dunkin’ Donuts. Despite the variety, my peer interactions ranged from merely decent to unsatisfying.
Consider my history study group, which met at a Brooklyn diner. Well, “met” might be a generous verb. I showed up, but no one else did. A few days later, my Twitter study-buddy also blew me off.
The message boards were better. As always on the Internet, trolls abound, including one who griped about our philosophy professor’s Italian accent. But the message boards are also packed with smart, helpful people. When I asked my genetics group if there might be “an evolutionary reason why so many people refuse to accept evolution as fact,” I got thoughtful responses and a link to a scholarly article.
And yet, codger that I am, I still found the boards lacking. I agree with my fellow Coursera student Peter Dewitz, a former offline professor at the University of Virginia, who e-mailed me that online discussions denied him “the rapid exchange of ideas that a true discussion would afford. The written version is slow motion.”
Attempting fast-motion, I video-chatted twice with a clutch of students in my Google Plus modern history group. Our conversations on Haitian independence and the professor’s possible first-world biases were worthwhile and wonderfully international: a Filipino scientist told me about his country’s education system, and a Brazilian businessman shared a data point on his country’s pronounced wealth inequality.
But none of the interactions seemed as invigorating as late-night dorm-room discussions at my nonvirtual college in the late 1980s. (Maybe that’s fuzzy nostalgia on my part.) This might change, of course, as the technology improves: when Skype perfects a Hologram version of a grad student lounge — give it five years — I’ll be first in line.
ASSIGNMENTS: B-
Coursework comes in various forms: multiple-choice quizzes, essays and projects, like building a pendulum for my scientific literacy class. I took dozens of quizzes that ranged from stressful in a pleasurable way to stressful in a stressful way. The genetics problem sets in particular got my creaky brain thinking in ways it hadn’t since I was an undergrad, which I appreciated.
Of course, since students are taking quizzes without proctors, cheating is a big MOOC concern. As it should be. When I Googled some quiz questions for my genetics course — as a journalist, I swear — I found a Canadian Web site with the answers.
A company called ProctorU has designed software to allow its employees to monitor studentstaking quizzes via webcam. When it comes to cheating, the cat-and-mouse game is likely to play out for a while.
Most of the quizzes are graded instantly by computer, but a few assignments are judged by fellow students. I wrote an essay for my “Aboriginal Worldviews” course in which I had to describe an American ritual as if it were foreign to me (I chose birthday parties). Three of my peers graded the paper. They were kind over all, but I bristled at every slight. Who died and made you professor?
OVERALL EXPERIENCE: B
Am I glad I spent a semester attending MOOCs? Yes. Granted, my retention rate was low, and I can’t think of any huge practical applications for my newfound knowledge (the closest came when I included Erich Fromm’s notion of freedom in a piece for my day job at Esquire — before deleting it). Though one fellow “Introduction to Finance” student, an information technology consultant, told me he’s planning to include the course on his résumé, I probably won’t go that far.
But MOOCs provided me with the thrill of relatively painless self-improvement and an easy introduction to heady topics. And just as important, they gave me relief from the guilt of watching “Swamp People.”
As these online universities gain traction, and start counting for actual college course credit, they’ll most likely have enormous real-world impact. They’ll help in getting jobs and creating business ideas. They might just live up to their hype. For millions of people around the globe with few resources, MOOCs may even be life-changing.
As for whether MOOCs will ever totally replace colleges made of brick, mortar and ivy, however, count me as a skeptic. A campus still has advantages for those lucky enough to afford the tuition — networking being one. (Even dropouts like Mark Zuckerberg made key social connections at Harvard.) And an online college will never crack Playboy’s venerable annual list of top party schools.
Then again, I won’t be able to give a real expert opinion on this until next January. That’s when I’m taking the University of Wisconsin online course on “Globalizing Higher Education.”
A.J. Jacobs is an editor at large at Esquire magazine and the author of “Drop Dead Healthy: One Man’s Humble Quest for Bodily Perfection.” 

A diferenca entre teoria e pratica (chez les compagnons, of course...)

A teoria diz como deve se comportar um mortal comum, em face dessas realidades comezinhas que se chamam leis, procedimentos investigatórios, relatórios, justiça, etc.
A prática é o que acontece, efetivamente, e nem sempre se conforma à teoria, qualquer que seja ela.
Num determinado universo, elas estão tão distantes quanto duas paralelas que nunca se cruzam.

Os fatos são estes:

Pode explodir
Rosemary Noronha está magoada e ameaça um revide em grande estilo. Sentindo-se desamparada pelos velhos companheiros que deixaram correr solta a investigação que pode levá-la mais uma vez às barras da Justiça, agora por enriquecimento ilícito, a ex-chefe do gabinete presidencial em São Paulo ameaça contar seus segredos e implicar gente graúda do partido e do governo. Se não for apenas mais um jogo de chantagem típico dos escândalos do universo petista, Rose poderá enfim dar uma grande contribuição ao país. Pelo menos até aqui, a ameaça da amiga dileta de Lula faz-se acompanhar de lances concretos — tão concretos que têm preocupado enormemente a cúpula partidária.
(Revista Veja, 20/04/2013)

Diferença entre teoria e prática:
Vocês querem saber qual é, num caso destes?
A diferença se chama omertà...
Paulo Roberto de Almeida 

Irregularidades administrativas no Itamaraty - Correio Braziliense


CGU na cola do Itamaraty
JOÃO VALADARES
 Correio Braziliense, 19/04/2013

Controladoria quer saber quais providências o MRE adotará no caso dos diplomatas que recebem salários sem trabalhar. Problemas na gestão de pessoal da pasta motivaram a suspensão de concurso até que seja implantado ponto eletrônico

A Controladoria-Geral da União (CGU) cobra hoje do Ministério das Relações Exteriores (MRE) informações detalhadas de todos os 17 casos de diplomatas do Itamaraty que ganham salário médio de R$ 20 mil, mas não dão expediente. A denúncia foi publicada na edição de ontem do Correio. O órgão explicou que a Corregedoria-Geral da União vai acompanhar e averiguar tudo o que o departamento próprio de correição do Itamaraty já fez ou fará em relação aos três embaixadores, cinco ministros de segunda classe, oito conselheiros e uma primeira-secretária.
A lista dos diplomatas que recebem salários sem estarem lotados aumentou. Ontem, passou para 18 nomes. A embaixadora Claudia D’Angelo, que estava cedida até 2011 ao Ministério da Justiça, deveria ter voltado ao trabalho em 10 de novembro do ano passado. Ao retornar ao Itamaraty, após gozar de licença prêmio, ela pediu novo afastamento legal por 58 dias para acompanhar um familiar que se encontra com problemas de saúde. O pedido é acobertado pelo artigo 83 da Lei n° 8.112/90. O problema é que a licença venceu em novembro e, até agora, não foi renovada. Mesmo assim, Claudia D’Angelo continua recebendo salário bruto de R$ 21.557 sem trabalhar.
Na quarta-feira, o embaixador José Borges Santos, diretor do Departamento do Serviço Exterior, e o chefe da Divisão do Pessoal, o conselheiro Adriano Pucci, alegaram que o caso de Claudia D’Angelo estava sendo resolvido, e reconheceram que a licença precisaria ser renovada.
É apenas mais um caso que evidencia a precariedade do modelo de gestão da pasta. O descontrole é tão evidente que o Ministério do Planejamento, Orçamento e Gestão (MPOG) negou, em março, autorização para o MRE realizar concurso público com o objetivo de contratar oficiais de chancelaria. Documentos obtidos pelo Correio apontam que, duas semanas após o subsecretário-geral do Serviço Exterior, Denis Fontes de Souza Pinto, pedir autorização para realizar o concurso, a secretária de gestão pública do MPOG, Ana Lúcia Amorim, negou o requerimento, alegando que “a demanda não possui os requisitos mínimos para análise técnica”.
Preocupação
Num documento interno do Itamaraty, encaminhado aos chefes de três departamentos logo depois da negativa, Denis Fontes demonstra preocupação com a desordem em relação ao controle da frequência e do horário dos servidores. “É com grande preocupação que a administração tem percebido o descumprimento dessas normas por parte das chefias das unidades. É notória a concessão informal de expediente de trabalho reduzido por parte das chefias do MRE.” No mesmo ofício, ele deixa claro o desconforto com a situação: “Não posso deixar de ressaltar os impactos negativos que tal prática tem gerado para a política de gestão de pessoal do Itamaraty”.
No fim do documento, o subsecretário-geral ressalta os motivos que levaram o MPOG a não autorizar o concurso. “A administração do MRE já foi informada pelo Ministério do Planejamento que eventuais pedidos para a realização de concursos serão analisados à luz da existência de sistema operante de controle eletrônico de ponto dos servidores.” O sistema eletrônico está em processo de licitação.
Ontem, a assessoria de imprensa limitou-se a informar que “todos os casos citados já mereciam a atenção da Administração do MRE, que continuará a tomar as medidas cabíveis para resolvê-los, cada um de acordo com as suas peculiaridades”. No entanto, há casos que se arrastam desde 2001. A anomalia é tão grande que a conselheira Ilka Maria Lehmkul, com salário de R$ 19.297, estava “invisível” para o MRE desde 2006. Ela simplesmente desapareceu do controle interno da pasta. Desde então, está sem trabalhar. Existem ainda cinco conselheiros que o MRE preferiu não se posicionar sobre a situação individual, porque passam por problemas de saúde. Mesmo alegando que as medidas já vinha sendo tomadas, após vários anos, nenhum deles foi aposentado por invalidez, e continuam ganhando salário sem trabalhar normalmente. Oficialmente, os diagnósticos que comprovariam o problema tecnicamente não prosperaram.
Outro diplomata que chama a atenção é o ministro de segunda classe Mario Grieco, que recebe salário de R$ 20.729,81, mas não trabalha desde 2006. O mais grave: apenas em julho do ano passado, o MRE descobriu a situação. E só em agosto de 2012 elaborou um memorando sugerindo uma lotação para ele. No entanto, segundo o próprio Itamaraty, ainda não há definição. Até lá, Grieco segue sem local de trabalho.
Há casos de dois embaixadores que esperam ser sabatinados no Senado e continuam sem lotação. Carlos Eduardo Sette Câmara, com salário de R$ 21.447, realizou apenas duas missões nos últimos dois anos. Desde novembro do ano passado, não precisa ir ao ministério, como os demais servidores. A justificativa oficial do Itamaraty é que ele aguarda o procedimento no Congresso para ser nomeado embaixador do Brasil em Nassau, nas Bahamas. A situação é a mesma de Eduardo Botelho Barbosa, que recebe R$ 19.420 e espera, desde janeiro, a sabatina para ser nomeado embaixador em Argel.
Na tarde de ontem, o Correio pediu informações ao MRE sobre missões de outros embaixadores. No entanto, a assessoria de imprensa da pasta alegou que a demanda “deveria ser feita via Lei de Acesso à Informação”. Na quarta-feira, o embaixador José Borges Santos explicou que os colegas sem lotação fazem parte de um grupo que pode ser deslocado a qualquer momento para missões internacionais. “É uma espécie de estoque.”

As opinioes mudam, a camisa tambem, segundo a oportunidade: sobre a Venezuela

O autor, embaixador venezuelano, certamente não simpático ao chavismo, examina neste artigo como as opiniões de certas pessoas mudam, segundo as circunstâncias e dependendo de quem esteja no poder. Em 1999, no Brasil, o governo era social-democrata, ou tucano neoliberal, como diriam alguns. Depois o governo mudou, e o personagem mudou de opinião. Ou talvez não, sempre foi coerente com o que pensou, apenas que não expunha...
Paulo Roberto de Almeida

O disciplinado Celso Amorim
Oscar Hernández Bernalette, embaixador venezuelano
O Estado de S. Paulo, Visão Global, 19/04/2013

Em 1999, ex-chanceler previu a diplomatas "anos difíceis" para uma Venezuela com Chávez; ao fim, negócios venceram valores

Nas relações internacionais, as coisas nem sempre funcionam com os mesmos parâmetros que na política interna.
Em geral, os países têm pouco interesse nas situações difíceis que podem estar afligindo algumas nações em determinados momentos. A história está cheia de tragédias nacionais em que governos fizeram vista grossa por demasiado tempo, sem intervir a tempo e devidamente ante essas tragédias.
Muitas situações difíceis e violações a que nações se submetem são com frequência aplaudidas por outros governos se houver interesses vitais para seus respectivos países. Por exemplo, bons negócios. Lula (o ex-presidente Luis Inácio Lula da Silva) é um exemplo de presidente que no exercício do cargo interveio descaradamente na política venezuelana a favor de um setor político tendo conhecimento de violações evidentes que em seu país seriam impensáveis. A atitude atual do Mercosul em relação à Venezuela é um bom exemplo. Uma coisa tão politicamente correta como a recontagem de votos ante uma evidente manipulação eleitoral é desvirtuada no momento em que os governos reagem fazendo vista grossa para a demanda da outra metade do país.
Na Venezuela, temos visto a cumplicidade de muitos governos e atores internacionais em face de muitas injustiças e violações que foram cometidas no país nos últimos anos. Há alguns dias, recordei um episódio com um dos protagonistas da política do avestruz.
Num restaurante do bucólico povoado de Coppet, nos arredores de Genebra, nos reunimos, em meados de 1999, sete diplomatas latino-americanos no que era um encontro de rotina que havíamos estabelecido para falar em caráter pessoal sobre temas de política internacional e avaliar a situação econômica e política de nossos países. Carlos Pérez del Castillo (Uruguai), Celso Amorim (Brasil), Roberto Lavagna (Argentina), Hemando JoséGómez (Colômbia), Alejandro Jara (Chile) e o que escreve essas linhas. Entre tantos temas da agenda que ocupava nossa atenção naqueles dias, chegamos a um enredo que já começava a causar indagações nos meios internacionais e entre analistas; a situação política da Venezuela.
O tenente-coronel Hugo Chávez acabava de tomar posse como presidente. Fiz uma explicação geral ao grupo de qual eram, no meu entender, as razões objetivas pelas quais um militar que havia tentado derrubar um governo eleito havia conseguido conquistar eleitoralmente o governo de uma das democracias mais sólidas do continente. Amorim, então embaixador do Brasil na Organização das Nações Unidas e na Organização Mundial do Comércio, um diplomata brilhante no melhor estilo dos homens formados no Itamaraty, interrompeu-me para fazer um comentário sucinto.
Ele garantiu aos presentes: "Anos muito difíceis esperam a Venezuela". Não pode terminar bem, assegurou, um governo que, embora livremente eleito,
origina-se com um líder que tentou derrotar pelas armas um governo legítimo.
Celso Amorim é o atual ministro da Defesa do Brasil e foi chanceler de Lula por oito anos. Ironicamente, ele foi um dos artífices da bem-sucedida relação do Brasil com o governo de Chávez.
Seguramente, ele nunca pensou que, depois daquela frase lapidar com que brindou um grupo de colegas há mais de uma década, se converteria, na sua condição de chanceler e diplomata disciplinado, em um dos esteios que daria força a Chávez em sua cruzada contra os Estados Unidos, enquanto seu país aproveitava para fazer negócios rendosos com o governo do socialismo do século 21. Viram a Venezuela como um pote de oportunidades em dólares e não como recipiente de valores democráticos que no passado foram o esteio de muitos países da região.
O sul mais uma vez dará as costas às justas demandas de milhões de venezuelanos.