O que é este blog?

Este blog trata basicamente de ideias, se possível inteligentes, para pessoas inteligentes. Ele também se ocupa de ideias aplicadas à política, em especial à política econômica. Ele constitui uma tentativa de manter um pensamento crítico e independente sobre livros, sobre questões culturais em geral, focando numa discussão bem informada sobre temas de relações internacionais e de política externa do Brasil. Para meus livros e ensaios ver o website: www.pralmeida.org. Para a maior parte de meus textos, ver minha página na plataforma Academia.edu, link: https://itamaraty.academia.edu/PauloRobertodeAlmeida;

Meu Twitter: https://twitter.com/PauloAlmeida53

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/paulobooks

Mostrando postagens com marcador Vladimir Putin. Mostrar todas as postagens
Mostrando postagens com marcador Vladimir Putin. Mostrar todas as postagens

quinta-feira, 1 de janeiro de 2015

A frase do inicio do ano: Vladimir Putin’s Unhappy New Year

It’s often said that Russian history veers between chaos and despotism. Vladimir Putin is the rare Kremlin leader to span both. 
Matthew Kaminski, The Wall Street Journal, January 1, 2015

segunda-feira, 28 de julho de 2014

Ucrania-Putin: europeus continuam hesitantes em face do novo czar desafiador - Der Spiegel

THE WAKE-UP CALL

Europe Toughens Stance against Putin

It took the shooting down of a Boeing jet carrying almost 300 people before the EU agreed on the first true economic sanctions against Russia. The Americans want further action, but it is impossible to know if punitive measures can sway Vladimir Putin.

STOPPING PUTIN

The Time Has Come for Europe to Act

Vladimir Putin has ignored Western demands that he cease arming and supporting pro-Russian separatists in Ukraine. As such, he shares responsibility for the shooting down of MH17. It is now time for Europe to take tough action.

segunda-feira, 21 de julho de 2014

A Ucrania sumiu do mapa diplomatico brasileiro? Em todo caso das notas do Itamaraty (site do MRE)

Morando fora, nem sempre acompanho tudo o que acontece naquele cantinho de planeta redondo, inclusive porque sendo ele redondo, e atendida a curvatura da terra, não consigo enxergar tudo o que se passa lá embaixo, estando eu aqui em cima (ou vice-versa, se nos fiarmos nos mapas bolivarianos e nos comunicados da TeleSur, que colocam o Sul no norte e o Norte no sul, ou vice-versa, vocês decidem). Enfin, passons...
Procurando saber o que nós, profissionais do ramo, teríamos a dizer sobre o infausto acontecimento do avião da Malásia que simplesmente foi obliterado nos céus da Ucrânia, ou procurando saber o que gente mais graúda tinha a dizer sobre o infausto, etc., fui ao único lugar onde se pode encontrar notas desse tipo, que é justamente o da instituição encarregada de falar, em nome do governo brasileiro, o que este tem a dizer sobre acontecimentos infaustos desse tipo.
Salvo miopia da minha parte, não consegui ver, e olha que repassei todas as notas, antes, durante e depois do infausto acontecimento...
Conclusão: à diferença de terremotos na Ásia, inundações um pouco em todas as partes, e até atos reprováveis cometidos por esses caras que andam por aí, perturbando a paz do mundo, nós não temos nada a dizer sobre o infausto acontecimento. Tem até uma nota sobre o conflito atual entre "Israel e a Palestina" (sic), que é um primor de equilíbrio, com linguagem ponderada, etc. Mas não achei nada sobre o tal de avião da Malásia sobrevoando a Ucrânia. Certamente vamos esperar pelas investigações para nos pronunciarmos. Assim espero.
Mas é curioso: sempre pensei que a gente emitisse notas quase automaticamente...
Paulo Roberto de Almeida

PS.: Addendum em 22/07/2014:
Descobri porque o governo, não o Itamaraty, ainda não emitiu nenhuma nota sobre o caso do avião abatido nos céus da Ucrânia: poderia ter sido o avião do Putin, assim, melhor esperar as investigações, com a ajuda do próprio, por sinal. Esta é, aliás, a explicação oficial dada nas mais altas esferas, com a linguagem que lhe é peculiar:
"É prudente tomar cuidado, porque tem um segmento da imprensa dizendo que o avião que foi derrubado estava na rota da volta do avião do presidente Putin. Coincidia com o horário e o percurso (...) Então, o governo brasileiro não se posicionará quanto a isso até que fique mais claro (...)"

Notas 

Nota nº 159 - 17/07/2014
Conflito entre Israel e Palestina
Nota nº 153 - 15/07/2014
VI Cúpula BRICS - Declaração de Fortaleza
15/07/2014 - Reunidos da VI Cúpula do BRICS, Chefes de Estado e de Governo do Brasil, da Rússia, da Índia, da China e da África do Sul aprovaram a "Declaração de Fortaleza" e o "Plano de ação de Fortaleza" 
Nota nº 143 - 04/07/2014
Calendário de eventos entre 05 de julho e 13 de julho de 2014

sexta-feira, 23 de maio de 2014

Vc quer tirar uma foto com Lenin, com Stalin, ou com Putin, o novo czar de algumas Russias (aumentando?)?

O que quer Vladimir Putin?

O maior objetivo do presidente da Rússia não é promover uma expansão imperialista, e sim fortalecer seu autoritarismo e esmagar a oposição interna

Nathalia Watkins, de Moscou, Veja, 16/05/2014
NACIONALISMO - Ensaio de desfile na Praça Vermelha, em Moscou: com Putin, as conquistas militares foram destacadas nos livros didáticos
NACIONALISMO - Ensaio de desfile na Praça Vermelha, em Moscou: com Putin, as conquistas militares foram destacadas nos livros didáticos      (Yuri Kozyrev/Noor)
Entre as muralhas vermelhas do Kremlin e lojas da Tiffany, Hermès e Louis Vuitton, milhares de russos aproveitam o calor da primavera para circular no coração da capital. Em uma das entradas da Praça Vermelha, visitantes formam fila para fazer pedidos, seguidos do lançamento de moedas sobre o marco zero de Moscou, o quadrado com um círculo no meio que fica no centro geográfico da cidade. Sem nenhuma cerimônia, um pedinte disputa os rublos no chão com uma mulher idosa. Sósias de Josef Stalin e Vladimir Lenin ficam ao redor na esperança de que os saudosistas paguem para tirar fotos com eles. Em poder de atração, nenhum deles é páreo para o sósia do presidente Vladimir Putin, o homem que desde março mantém o Ocidente em estado de tensão por ter anexado a Península da Crimeia à força e que agora empurra a Ucrânia para uma guerra civil de resultados imprevisíveis. “As pessoas se aproximam e me agradecem pela recuperação da Crimeia. Sou muito grato por ser parecido com o nosso presidente”, diz o sósia de Putin, que prefere não revelar o seu nome verdadeiro. Um clique ao seu lado custa 1 000 rublos, dinheiro suficiente para comprar onze sanduíches em uma loja do McDonald’s ali perto. “Todo mundo que me vê fica alegre e sorri. É assim comigo e com o nosso presidente. Os russos sabem que com ele tudo ficará bem, em ordem”, diz o Putin de mentira. Enquanto Lenin e Stalin labutam o dia todo, o requisitado Putin trabalha somente duas horas por dia e apenas em alguns dias da semana.
Putin, o sósia, fala em “recuperação” da Crimeia da mesma forma que Putin, o verdadeiro. A maioria dos russos pensa de maneira semelhante. Não se encontra quem aceite o termo “anexação” para explicar a tomada daquela região pela Rússia. Para eles, a península que então pertencia à Ucrânia sempre foi uma parte de seu país, salvo em um breve intervalo entre os anos de 1954 e 2014. Oito em cada dez russos estão de acordo sobre a tomada da Crimeia e aprovam a gestão do presidente. Suas palavras, seus raciocínios e seu discurso nacionalista, embora estranhos para ouvidos estrangeiros, têm soado como música clássica para os russos. Putin não tem a intenção de expandir as fronteiras da Rússia, como fizeram os czares e os comunistas soviéticos. A maior parte dos russos acha que a anexação da Crimeia foi um bem para os próprios anexados e que isso trará até prejuízos econômicos a Moscou. O presidente Putin explora muito bem o forte sentimento patriótico dos russos. O objetivo é prolongar seu poder pelo mais longo tempo possível — e apagar qualquer faísca mais forte da oposição interna.
Para ler a continuação dessa reportagem compre a edição desta semana de VEJA no IBA, no tablet, no iPhone ou nas bancas.
Outros destaques de VEJA desta semana

sábado, 10 de maio de 2014

William Browder: o maior inimigo de Putin no Ocidente - Matthew Kaminski



The Man Who Stood Up to Putin

How Russia's 'biggest cheerleader' became the Kremlin's fiercest critic and persuaded Congress to roll the White House on sanctions.

Two members of the Russian punk band Pussy Riot hit Capitol Hill this week. Nadezhda Tolokonnikova and Maria Alyokhina, who were jailed for nearly two years after performing an anti-Kremlin "punk prayer" in a Moscow cathedral in 2012, charmed senators and called for stronger U.S. sanctions on Russia. Making the introductions was a bald, 50-year-old, London-based fund manager in rimmed glasses.
Even in a gathering of U.S. lawmakers and Russian provocateurs, William Browder is arguably the most effective foe of Russian President Vladimir Putin. Two years ago he was the one-man force campaigning for the Magnitsky Act, which Congress passed over White House objections. Named after Mr. Browder's lawyer, Sergei Magnitsky, a corruption whistleblower who died in a Moscow prison cell, the law bans "gross abusers" of rights in Russia from banking in or visiting the U.S.

Mr. Browder is now lobbying other countries to follow the American example, and he wants the Obama administration to expand the Magnitsky list of those banned. Yet he seems almost surprised by his advocacy. "If someone had asked me at Stanford Business School 25 years ago, can I imagine being a full-time human-rights activist?" he says, "I would have looked at them like they were out of their minds."
He understates the ironies. Less than a decade ago, his Hermitage Capital managed the largest pool of foreign money invested in Russia, $4 billion at its peak. He was called "Russia's biggest cheerleader" (Associated Press) and "one of the most outspoken supporters among foreign investors of President Putin" (this newspaper). He endorsed, loudly, the 2003 arrest, subsequent trials and expropriation of Yukos oil-company bossMikhail Khodorkovsky, then the country's richest man, an episode that heralded Mr. Putin's descent into political repression.
Then there is his presence on Capitol Hill: Raised in Chicago, Mr. Browder gave up his U.S. passport in 1998 and took British citizenship. Many assumed he did it to save on taxes. He insists that he simply felt estranged from the U.S. over its treatment of his family. His grandfather Earl Browder led the Communist Party in the U.S. throughout the Roosevelt era and landed before McCarthy-era congressional committees and in jail twice.
Mr. Browder isn't a man prone to public intro- or retrospection. In his current fight against the Putin regime, he shows the same monomaniacal focus and brusque manner that he did in selling investors on Russia. He brought Pussy Riot to Washington to help break a deadlock over implementing the Magnitsky law. The Obama administration originally sanctioned 18 Russians implicated in his lawyer's death but refused to add names to the list by a December deadline. Administration officials quietly told vexed Hill staffers they wanted to avoid a clash with Mr. Putin before the Sochi Winter Olympics.
But Sochi is over, Mr. Browder notes. "Russia starts a war [in Ukraine], invades a foreign country, starts repressing the hell out of everybody in their own country—and there's still no list." By law the administration has until May 17 to reply to a congressional request to expand the roster of the banned.
White House opposition to Magnitsky reflected both the habitual presidential distrust of congressional meddling in foreign policy and this administration's support for a "reset" in relations with Russia. On the right and left, the realist case against sanctions is that they don't work. After Magnitsky passed, Mr. Putin retaliated by banning Americans from adopting Russian children.
Mr. Browder says the sanctions skeptics don't understand the cost-and-benefit calculations of "the people doing this stuff" in Moscow: Russian elites' fear of Magnitsky can improve their behavior. "It's like saying, 'What makes you think that bonuses make people work harder?'" he says.
Viewed through his prism, the global economy is a mixed blessing for activists. As wealthy Russians throw money toward London and Germany, he says, "a lot of Westerners are prostituting themselves to try to protect their interests." Witness the European Union's reluctance to adopt serious sanctions against Moscow over Ukraine.
Yet the flood of Russian money moving out of the country also makes a law like Magnitsky a "21st-century tool for fighting human-rights abuses." Elites in most authoritarian states are hooked on holidays, houses and banks in the West. "This is a tool that's come as a result of living in a globalized world," he says. "It used to be that the Khmer Rouge didn't travel to St. Tropez, but now some equivalent does."
In his family, Mr. Browder calls himself "the dummy." His father Felix and uncle William are acclaimed mathematicians. His brother, Thomas, is a physicist. Repeating what has become standard Browder lore, he says: "I became a capitalist to rebel against a family of communists and left-wing academics. Around the dinner table it was thought that all businessmen are crooks."
After business school, he landed in Eastern Europe in 1989. He saw opportunities through the chaos of destroyed communist economies. He worked briefly in consulting and for the lateRobert Maxwell's private equity business before running Salomon Brothers' Russia equities team. With $25 million from the late banker Edmond Safra and Israeli mining tycoon Benny Steinmetz, he set up Hermitage in 1996. The fund gained 794% in the first 18 months.
Mr. Browder gritted out the 1998 Russian financial crisis and adopted a different strategy. He took minority stakes in inefficient behemoths like gas monopolistGazprom and Sberbank, the savings bank, and sought to raise the share price by advocating better governance.
'We did forensic research about how they went about the stealing, and then exposed it," he says, through his contacts in the Western press. He found an ally in Russia's new president, Vladimir Putin. The former KGB man used Hermitage's work to change the management at Gazprom and Unified Energy System, the electric utility. The Russian leader wanted to neuter the business barons from the 1990s and bring in his own.
Hermitage played by the new rules and did well. Then Mr. Browder's luck ran out. In late 2005, he was denied entry into Russia. He pulled every possible string to get his visa restored, even lobbying theBush White House. Aware of his passport switch to Britain, a senior official advised: "Ask your own government for help."
At the Davos economic forum in early 2006, Mr. Browder continued to talk up Russia's economic prospects. But by the end of that year Hermitage had liquidated most of its assets in Russia and Mr. Browder had moved his staff to London. He says Gazprom was behind his expulsion. Mr. Putin, having secured his own place atop the business and political pyramid in Russia, had no more use for Hermitage's minority-rights campaigns. Mr. Browder's critics say his success went to his head and he pushed too far.
Over breakfast in New York this week, Mr. Browder turns uncharacteristically frank about his past support for the Russian regime. "Everybody always looks at others and sees what they want to see," he says. Mr. Putin, little known before Boris Yeltsintapped him as his successor, seemed "a reforming kind of president who is bringing some order back to a crazy disordered place" dominated by oligarchs, Mr. Browder says. Now he says he realizes that the Russian leader was creating "this more lopsided oligarchy."
Back in London, Mr. Browder turned Hermitage into a global emerging-markets fund. The results were mixed. But troubles in Moscow continued. In June 2007, the interior ministry raided what remained of his company's and his lawyers' Moscow offices, seizing computers and documents. A few months later, Moscow authorities used these materials to engineer a complex scheme to claim a $230 million tax refund for themselves. Sergei Magnitsky, a lawyer at tax firm Firestone Duncan's Moscow office, looked into the matter for Hermitage.
When he uncovered the fraud against the Russian state, he went public. The Russian state didn't appreciate it. A few weeks later Magnitsky was arrested by the same interior-ministry officials he had implicated. He spent over a year in jail, in appalling conditions, before dying in 2009 of untreated pancreatitis after a severe beating at age 37.
Mr. Browder had a new cause. He put his own and his staff's experience in digging up dirt about financial shenanigans in Russia to document what happened. Hermitage released easy-to-follow, detailed pamphlets such as the 75-page "The Torture and Murder of Sergei Magnitsky and the Cover Up by the Russian Government." Names were named. A tireless campaigner, Mr. Browder lobbied the U.S. and Europe to sanction those officials and worked his media contacts. When the State Department gave him the runaround, Mr. Browder talked to Sen. Ben Cardin, the Maryland Democrat. Mr. Cardin introduced the first Magnitsky Act in 2010 with bipartisan support.
For four years Mr. Browder has devoted nearly all of his time to being "a kind of guerrilla warrior" for human rights. Now Hermitage only manages his investments. At his recent 50th-birthday party in London, a number of friends stood up to say they thought he was crazy to fight Russia over the Magnitsky case. He worries about his security. Last year, a Russian court found him—and the dead Sergei Magnitsky—guilty of tax evasion and sentenced Mr. Browder to nine years in prison. The Russians issued an international warrant for his arrest.
He says this work is "a hundred times more gratifying than fighting for money," likening it to an "awakening." Mr. Browder brought Magnitsky's widow and child to London and looks after them.
Others see the same old Bill of Moscow days, looking to get his way—this time to take his revenge against the Putin Kremlin. He's not evasive or barbed, as sometimes in the past, and considers the charge seriously. "How do you separate one emotion from another? Grief. Indignation. Revenge. Guilt. There are a thousand different emotions that are mixed up in this quest for justice," he says. "Everyone wants to simplify and demonize and look for all the wrong motivations. They can do that all they want. It doesn't really matter what people think it is."
Sens. Cardin and John McCain have introduced "a global" Magnitsky bill to extend the punishments to human-rights abusers anywhere in the world. Canada may soon adopt its own Magnitsky legislation. The Europeans aren't close.
Is Mr. Browder close to winning the justice he says he's seeking for Sergei Magnitsky? "Justice, no," he says. "I believe we've pricked the bubble of impunity. Meaning that people didn't get away with it. But justice, the way I'd like to see justice, is prosecution for torture and murder. We're not going to get that while Putin is in power. But my hope—and I think we've succeeded in this—is that when they have the tribunals of crimes of the previous regime in Russia, the first tribunals will be the Magnitsky tribunals."
Mr. Kaminski is a member of the Journal's editorial board.

=======

What is the Magnitsky Act: 

  • Sergei Leonidovich Magnitsky was a Russian accountant and auditor whose arrest and subsequent death in custody generated international media attention and triggered both official and unofficial inquiries...
The Magnitsky Act, formally known as the Russia and Moldova Jackson-Vanik Repeal and Sergei Magnitsky Rule of Law Accountability Act of 2012, is a bipartisan bill passed by the U.S. Congress and President Obamain November–December 2012, intending to punish Russian officials responsible for the death of Russian lawyer Magnitsky in a Moscow prison in 2009.

quarta-feira, 7 de maio de 2014

Russia: o novo despotismo em construcao (NYT)



Estes são os nossos aliados nos Brics: os que promovem censura, repressão nos meios de comunicação, ataques a blogueiros independentes ou de oposição, enfim, monopolização do poder político, tudo o que gostariam de fazer no Brasil os companheiros do partido neobolchevique, os leninistas tropicais, frustrados porque até agora não conseguiram fazer o mesmo que seus aliados russos, chineses, bolivarianos, ou seja, totalitários de várias espécies 

Paulo Roberto de Almeida 

Russia Quietly Tightens Reins on Web With ‘Bloggers Law’

President Vladimir V. Putin on Monday. A new law he signed requires popular online voices to register with the government.
POOL PHOTO BY MIKHAIL KLIMENTYEV

MOSCOW — Russia has taken another major step toward restricting its once freewheeling Internet, as President Vladimir V. Putin quietly signed a new law requiring popular online voices to register with the government, a measure that lawyers, Internet pioneers and political activists said Tuesday would give the government a much wider ability to track who said what online.
Mr. Putin’s action on Monday, just weeks after he disparaged the Internet as “a special C.I.A. project,” borrowed a page from the restrictive Internet playbooks of many governments around the world that have been steadily smothering online freedoms they once tolerated.
The idea that the Internet was at best controlled anarchy and beyond any one nation’s control is fading globally amid determined attempts by more and more governments to tame the web. If innovations like Twitter were hailed as recently as the Arab uprisings as the new public square, governments like those in China, Pakistan, Turkey, Iran and now Russia are making it clear that they can deploy their tanks on virtual squares, too.
China, long a pioneer in using sophisticated technology to filter the Internet, has continually tightened censorship. It has banned all major Western online social media sites, including Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and Google, though it seems not to be bothered by Alibaba, its homegrown e-commerce site, which has filed the paperwork for what could be the biggest public stock offering ever.
Nevertheless, even Beijing’s own social media champion, Weibo, valued at $3.6 billion in a public stock offering this year, has come under mounting censorship pressure as the government fine-tunes its policing of expression.
Under the pressure of a corruption scandal, Turkey recently imposed bans on Twitter and YouTube over tapes alleging corruption by the country’s prime minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Although the YouTube ban remains, Twitter service was restored in April only after the Constitutional Court overturned the ban.
During protests against the government in Venezuela in February, there were reports that the government there was blocking online images from users. In recent years, Pakistan has banned 20,000 to 40,000 websites, including YouTube, saying they offend Muslims. Facebook was blocked for a while in 2010, but is now accessible.
The level of challenge is rising, but “we also see the amount of resources going into censorship increasing greatly,” Jonathan Zittrain, a professor at Harvard Law School who specializes in Internet law, said in a telephone interview.
Widely known as the “bloggers law,” the new Russian measure specifies that any site with more than 3,000 visitors daily will be considered a media outlet akin to a newspaper and be responsible for the accuracy of the information published.
Besides registering, bloggers can no longer remain anonymous online, and organizations that provide platforms for their work such as search engines, social networks and other forums must maintain computer records on Russian soil of everything posted over the previous six months.
“This law will cut the number of critical voices and opposition voices on the Internet,” said Galina Arapova, director of the Mass Media Defense Center and an expert on Russian media law. “The whole package seems quite restrictive and might affect harshly those who disseminate critical information about the state, about authorities, about public figures.”
Mr. Putin has already used the pliable Russian Parliament to pass laws that scattered the opposition, hobbled nongovernmental organizations and shut down public protests. Now, riding a wave of popular support after hosting the Winter Olympics and annexing Crimea, he has turned his attention to regulating the Internet, as well as burnishing his credentials as the worldwide champion of conservative values.
Aside from the Internet law signed Monday, the Russian leader signed a new profanity law that levies heavy fines for using four common vulgarities in the arts, including literature, movies, plays and television.
Speaking in St. Petersburg in late April, Mr. Putin voiced his suspicions about the Internet, even while noting that it had become a public market of huge proportions.
“You know that it all began initially, when the Internet first appeared, as a special C.I.A. project,” he said in remarks broadcast live nationally, before adding that “special services are still at the center of things.” He specifically thanked Edward J. Snowden, the former National Security Agency contractor granted asylum in Russia, for revealing to the world how efficient the N.S.A. was at collecting information.
Mr. Putin went on to say that someone writing online whose opinion affects thousands or even hundreds of thousands of people should be considered a media outlet. He said he was not talking about a ban, only acting “the way it is done all over the world.”
Russian Internet pioneers despaired that Mr. Putin was really talking about the Chinese model of curtailing any political discussion online.
“It is part of the general campaign to shut down the Internet in Russia,” said Anton Nossik, an early online media figure here. “They have not been able to control it until now, and they think they should implement the Chinese model. But they don’t understand how it works. The Chinese model also stimulates the development of local platforms, while the Russian laws are killing the local platform.”
Russia is among a growing list of countries that have sought to shut down Internet voices circumventing a subservient national news media. Many leaders see the Internet as the key tool behind antigovernment demonstrations and are determined to render it ineffective.
Yet polls conducted in 24 countries last spring by Pew Research found that most people are against government censorship of the Internet, including 63 percent in Russia and 58 percent in Turkey.
Another Russian Internet law, one that went into effect on Feb. 1, gave the government the power to block websites. It immediately used the law against its most vocal critics, like Alexei Navalny and Garry Kasparov, as well as online news sites that reported on demonstrations and other political activity.
In April, Pavel Durov, the 29-year-old founder of Vkontakte, Russia’s popular version of Facebook, said he had fled the country because he feared the consequences of refusing to turn over information the government requested about activists in Russia and Ukraine. Critics said he had fled after cashing out, and United Capital Partners, the owner of a 48 percent stake in the company, posted a lengthy statement online saying he was trying to divert attention from legal issues surrounding his running of the company.
Aleksandr Zharov, who runs Roskomnadzor, the government agency that supervises the Internet, told the state-run RIA Novosti news agency last month that the law was necessary because people need to be held responsible for what they say on the web. “What he would never say face to face, he often allows himself online,” Mr. Zharov was quoted as saying.
The lack of transparency in Russia creates a kind of fog around countless issues, and the Internet is no different. Many critics and even some supporters of the new law said it was too vague to understand.
The Internet needs to be regulated by law just like publishing, said Robert A. Shlegel, among the youngest members of Parliament from United Russia, Mr. Putin’s party. But Internet savvy among legislators is weak, he added. “The law, as it is, is so raw,” he said. “It is clear that the person who wrote it just doesn’t understand.”
The law does not specify how the government will count the 3,000 daily visitors, for example. Even before Mr. Putin signed it, two of the largest blogging platforms, Yandex and LiveJournal, announced that henceforth their publicly visible counters would stop below 3,000.
Ms. Arapova said other murky issues included who would be considered a provider. For instance, will large international social media or search sites like Google, Twitter and Facebook have to keep their data in Russia or face fines and possible closing?
In California, both Twitter and Facebook said they were studying the law but would not comment further.
Ms. Arapova said the law would undoubtedly have a chilling effect in terms of who would go online. Whistle-blowers who work for corrupt government agencies, for example, would theoretically no longer be able to post anonymously.
The actual impact of the law will not be measurable until after it goes into effect on Aug. 1, Ms. Arapova said. Punishments start at fines that can reach up to $142,000 or the temporary closing of the blog, if the law is actively enforced.
Like the Internet law, the ban on four vulgar words was met with a combination of dismay and derision among artists. (The words, not mentioned in the law either, are crude terms for male and female genitalia, sex and a prostitute.) Many people thought it would be widely ignored, but the very idea that the Kremlin was trying to censor the arts rankled.
“We feel like we are back in kindergarten again when they said, ‘Don’t pee in your bed and don’t eat with your hands and don’t use that word,’ ” said Viktor V. Yerofeyev, a popular writer. “On the one hand, the Russian government says the Russian people are the best. On the other hand, it doesn’t trust the people.”

sexta-feira, 2 de maio de 2014

Putin post-communist, or post-fascist; may be, de facto fascist - Jan Fleischhauer

Opinion: Putin's Not Post-Communist, He's Post-Fascist

By Jan Fleischhauer
Der Spiegel, May 2nd, 2014
Russian President Vladmir Putin: "Death is horrible, isn't it?"
Some like to idealize Vladimir Putin as the ideological successor to the 
left-wing Soviet leaders, but that's sheer nonsense. His speeches 
offer clear evidence that his points of reference originate in fascism. 
Russian President Vladmir Putin: "Death is horrible, isn't it?"Zoom

In order to understand Vladimir Putin, you have to listen to him. You have to read what he wants. More importantly, though, you have to see what it is that he is seeking to prevent. Often, a politician's fears and aversions can be more telling than his or her plans and promises.
So what is it that drives Putin? The central theme of all his speeches is the fear of encirclement -- the threat represented by powers that want to keep the Russian people down because they fear its inner strength. "They are constantly trying to sweep us into a corner because we have an independent position, because we maintain it and because we call things like they are and do not engage in hypocrisy," he said in a March 18 speech before the Duma. In a television interview in April, he said: "There are enough forces in the world that are afraid of our strength, 'our hugeness,' as one of our sovereigns said. So they seek to divide us into parts."
A Threat to the Russian Soul
There remains a tendency to view the Kremlin's foreign policy primarily from a geopolitical perspective -- namely that the country is seeking to recover some of the territory it lost when the Soviet Union dissolved. But when Putin speaks of the enemy of the Russian people, he is speaking about something deeper and more basic. The forces against which he has declared war are not only seeking to expand their influence further and further into the East -- they are also going after the Russian soul. That's what he means when he says that Russia must put up a fight against the West.
But what's at the heart of this soul? Putin has provided some insights here as well. "It seems to me that the Russian person or, on a broader scale, a person of the Russian world, primarily thinks about his or her highest moral designation, some highest moral truths," he said in the interview. In contrast to this is a West that is fixated on personal success and prosperity or, as Putin states, the "inner self." In the view of its president, the battle Russia is waging is ideological in nature. It is a fight against the superficiality of materialism, against the decline in values, against the feminization and effeminacy of society -- and against the dissolution of all traditional bonds that are part of that development. In short, against everything "un-Russian."
Even today, many are having trouble recognizing the true nature of a man who is currently in the process of turning the European peace order on its head. Perhaps we don't have the courage to make the right comparisons because they remind us of an era that we thought we had put behind us. Within Germany's Left Party and parts of the center-left Social Democrats, Putin is still viewed as a man molded in the tradition of the Soviet party leader, who stood for an idealized version of Socialism. The old knee-jerk sense of solidarity is still there. It is based on a misunderstanding, though, because Putin isn't post-communist. He's post-fascist.
A search for the right historical analogy should focus on the events of Rome in 1919 rather than Sarajevo in 1914. It won't take long for those who step inside the world of echo chambers and metaphors that color Putin's thinking to identify traits that were also present at the birth of fascism. There's Putin's cult of the body, the lofty rhetoric of self-assertion, the denigration of his opponents as degenerates, his contempt for democracy and Western parliamentarianism, his exaggerated nationalism.
Enemies of freedom on the far right in Europe sensed the changing political climate early on. They immediately understood that, in Putin, someone is speaking who shares their obsessions and aversions. Putin reciprocates by acknowledging these like-minded individuals. "As for the rethinking of values in European countries, yes, I agree that we are witnessing this process," he told his television interviewer last Thursday, pointing to Victor Orban's victory in Hungary and the success of Marine Le Pen in France. It was the only positive thing he had to say in the entirety of a four-hour interview.
An Historic Mission for the Russian People

When they were first introduced one year ago, people also failed to recognize the true meaning of Russia's new anti-gay laws. But today it is clear that it marked the emergence of the new Russia. What began with an anti-gay law is now continuing at another level: The logical progression of the belief that certain groups are inferior is the belief in the superiority of one's own people.And when Putin evokes the myth of Moscow as a "Third Rome," it is clear he is assigning the Russian people with an historic mission. Responsibility is falling to Russia not only to stop Western decadence at its borders, but also to provide a last bastion for those who had already given up hope in this struggle. But he is also saying that Russia can never yield.
"Death is horrible, isn't it?" Putin asked viewers at the end of his television appearance. "But no, it appears it may be beautiful if it serves the people: Death for one's friends, one's people or for the homeland, to use the modern word." That's as fascist as it gets.
Jan Fleischhauer is the author of SPIEGEL ONLINE's weekly conservative political column.