O que é este blog?

Este blog trata basicamente de ideias, se possível inteligentes, para pessoas inteligentes. Ele também se ocupa de ideias aplicadas à política, em especial à política econômica. Ele constitui uma tentativa de manter um pensamento crítico e independente sobre livros, sobre questões culturais em geral, focando numa discussão bem informada sobre temas de relações internacionais e de política externa do Brasil. Para meus livros e ensaios ver o website: www.pralmeida.org. Para a maior parte de meus textos, ver minha página na plataforma Academia.edu, link: https://itamaraty.academia.edu/PauloRobertodeAlmeida.

Mostrando postagens com marcador Google. Mostrar todas as postagens
Mostrando postagens com marcador Google. Mostrar todas as postagens

domingo, 2 de março de 2025

Revisitando a frustrada Comunidade Europeia de Defesa, de 1952

Seria este o momento de retomar a iniciativa sabotada pela Assembleia Francesa em 1954?

Comunidade Europeia de Defesa  (1952)
(segundo fontes compiladas via Google search e Wikipedia)
The "Accord Européen de Défense" of 1952 refers to the Treaty establishing the European Defence Community (EDC), which was signed on May 27, 1952 by six European countries: Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands; this treaty aimed to create a unified European military force, essentially a "European Army", but it was never ratified by the French parliament and ultimately failed to come into effect. 
Key points about the EDC: 
  • Objective:
    To integrate European military forces under a single command, acting as a unified pillar within NATO. 
  • Failure due to French opposition:
    The French National Assembly refused to ratify the treaty, effectively halting the project. 
  • Significance:
    Considered a crucial early attempt at European integration, although it ultimately failed. 

    The Treaty establishing the European Defence Community, also known as the Treaty of Paris,[1] is an unratified treaty signed on 27 May 1952 by the six 'inner' countries of European integrationBelgiumLuxemburg, the NetherlandsFranceItaly, and West Germany. The treaty would have created a European Defence Community (EDC), with a unified defence force acting as an autonomous European pillar within the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). The ratification process was completed in the Benelux countries and West Germany, but stranded after the treaty was rejected in the French National Assembly. Instead, the London and Paris Conferences provided for West Germany's accession to NATO and the Western European Union (WEU), the latter of which was a transformed version of the pre-existing Western Union
    The treaty was initiated by the Pleven plan, proposed in 1950 by then French Prime Minister René Pleven in response to the American call for the rearmament of West Germany. The formation of a pan-European defence architecture, as an alternative to West Germany's proposed accession to NATO, was meant to harness the German military potential in case of conflict with the Soviet bloc. Just as the Schuman Planwas designed to end the risk of Germany having the economic power on its own to make war again, the Pleven Plan and EDC were meant to prevent the military possibility of Germany's making war again.
    The European Defence Community would have entailed a pan-European military, divided into national components, and had a common budget, common arms, centralized military procurement, and institutions.

    The main contributions to the proposed 43-division force:[3]

    • France: 14 divisions, 750 planes
    • West Germany: 12 divisions*
    • Italy: 12 divisions, 450 planes
    • Benelux: 5 divisions, 600 planes

    *West Germany would have had an air force, but a clause in the EDC treaty would have forbidden it to build war-planes, atomic weapons, guided missiles and battleships.

    In this military, the French, Italian, Belgian, Dutch, and Luxembourgish components would report to their national governments, whereas the West German component would report to the EDC. This was due to the fear of a return of German militarism, so it was desired that the West German government would not have control over its military. However, in the event of its rejection, it was agreed to let the West German government control its own military in any case (something which the treaty would not have provided).

    A European Political Community (EPC) was proposed in 1952 as a combination of the existing European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) and the proposed European Defence Community (EDC). A draft EPC treaty, as drawn up by the ECSC assembly (now the European Parliament), would have seen a directly elected assembly ("the Peoples’ Chamber"), a senate appointed by national parliaments and a supranational executive accountable to the parliament.

    The European Political Community project failed in 1954 when it became clear that the European Defence Community would not be ratified by the French national assembly, which feared that the project entailed an unacceptable loss of national sovereignty. As a result, the European Political Community idea had to be abandoned.[4][5]

    Following the collapse of the EPC, European leaders met in the Messina Conference in 1955 and established the Spaak Committee which would pave the way for the creation of the European Economic Community (EEC).

    History:

    During the late 1940s, the divisions created by the Cold War were becoming evident. The United States looked with suspicion at the growing power of the USSR and European states felt vulnerable, fearing a possible Soviet occupation. In this climate of mistrust and suspicion, the United States considered the rearmament of West Germany as a possible solution to enhance the security of Europe and of the whole Western bloc.[6]

    In August 1950, Winston Churchillproposed the creation of a common European army, including German soldiers, in front of the Council of Europe:

    “We should make a gesture of practical and constructive guidance by declaring ourselves in favour of the immediate creation of a European Army under a unified command, and in which we should all bear a worthy and honourable part.”

    — Winston Churchill, speech at the Council of Europe 1950[7]

    The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe subsequently adopted the resolution put forward by the United Kingdom and officially endorsed the idea:

    “The Assembly, in order to express its devotion to the maintenance of peace and its resolve to sustain the action of the Security Council of the United Nations in defence of peaceful peoples against aggression, calls for the immediate creation of a unified European Army subject to proper European democratic control and acting in full co-operation with the United States and Canada.”

    — Resolution of the Council of Europe 1950[7]

    In September 1950, Dean Acheson, under a cable submitted by High Commissioner John J. McCloy, proposed a new plan to the European states; the American plan, called package, sought to enhance NATO's defense structure, creating 12 West German divisions. However, after the destruction that Germany had caused during World War II, European countries, in particular France, were not ready to see the reconstruction of the German military.[8] Finding themselves in the midst of the two superpowers, they looked at this situation as a possibility to enhance the process of integrating Europe, trying to obviate the loss of military influence caused by the new bipolar order and thus supported a common army.[9]

    On 24 October 1950, France's Prime Minister René Pleven proposed a new plan, which took his name although it was drafted mainly by Jean Monnet, that aimed to create a supranational European army. With this project, France tried to satisfy America's demands, avoiding, at the same time, the creation of German divisions, and thus the rearmament of Germany.[10][11]

    “Confident as it is that Europe’s destiny lies in peace and convinced that all the peoples of Europe need a sense of collective security, the French Government proposes […] the creation, for the purposes of common defence, of a European army tied to the political institutions of a united Europe.”

    — René Pleven, speech at the French Parliament 1950[12]

    The EDC was to include West Germany, France, Italy, and the Benelux countries. The United States would be excluded. It was a competitor to NATO (in which the US played the dominant role), with France playing the dominant role. Just as the Schuman Plan was designed to end the risk of Germany having the economic power to make war again, the Pleven Plan and EDC were meant to prevent the same possibility. Britain approved of the plan in principle, but agreed to join only if the supranational element was decreased.[13]

    According to the Pleven Plan, the European Army was supposed to be composed of military units from the member states, and directed by a council of the member states’ ministers. Although with some doubts and hesitation, the United States and the six members of the ECSC approved the Pleven Plan in principle.

    The initial approval of the Pleven Plan led the way to the Paris Conference, launched in February 1951, where it was negotiated the structure of the supranational army.

    France feared the loss of national sovereignty in security and defense, and thus a truly supranational European Army could not be tolerated by Paris.[14]However, because of the strong American interest in a West German army, a draft agreement for a modified Pleven Plan, renamed the European Defense Community (EDC), was ready in May 1952, with French support.

    Among compromises and differences, on 27 May 1952 the six foreign ministers signed the Treaty of Paris establishing the European Defence Community (EDC).

    All signatories except France and Italy ratified the treaty. The Italian parliament aborted its ratification process due to France's failed ratification.

    The EDC went for ratification in the French National Assembly on 30 August 1954, and failed by a vote of 319 against 264.

    By the time of the vote, concerns about a future conflict faded with the death of Joseph Stalin and the end of the Korean War. Concomitant to these fears were a severe disjuncture between the original Pleven Plan of 1950 and the one defeated in 1954. Divergences included military integration at the division rather than battalion level and a change in the command structure putting NATO's Supreme Allied Commander Europe(SACEUR) in charge of EDC operational capabilities. The reasons that led to the failed ratification of the Treaty were twofold, concerning major changes in the international scene, as well as domestic problems of the French Fourth Republic.[24] There were Gaullistfears that the EDC threatened France's national sovereignty, constitutional concerns about the indivisibility of the French Republic, and fears about West Germany's remilitarization. French Communists opposed a plan tying France to the capitalist United Statesand setting it in opposition to the Communist bloc. Other legislators worried about the absence of the United Kingdom.

    The Prime Minister, Pierre Mendès-France, tried to placate the treaty's detractors by attempting to ratify additional protocols with the other signatory states. These included the sole integration of covering forces, or in other words, those deployed within West Germany, as well as the implementation of greater national autonomy in regard to budgetary and other administrative questions. Despite the central role for France, the EDC plan collapsed when it failed to obtain ratification in the French Parliament.

    The treaty never went into effect. Instead, after the failed ratification in the French National Assembly, West Germany was admitted into NATO[25]and the EEC member states tried to create foreign policy cooperation in the De Gaulle-sponsored Fouchet Plan(1959–1962). European foreign policy was finally established during the third attempt with European Political Cooperation (EPC) (1970). This became the predecessor of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP).

    Today the European Union and NATO, and formerly also the Western European Union, all carry out some of the functions which was envisaged for the EDC, although none approach the degree of supranational military control that the EDC would have provided for.

    Since the end of World War IIsovereignEuropean countries have entered into treaties and thereby co-operated and harmonised policies (or pooled sovereignty) in an increasing number of areas, in the European integration project or the construction of Europe(Frenchla construction européenne). The following timeline outlines the legal inception of the European Union (EU)—the principal framework for this unification. The EU inherited many of its present responsibilities from the European Communities (EC), which were founded in the 1950s in the spirit of the Schuman Declaration.


sexta-feira, 12 de novembro de 2021

A imprensa e eu: interações erráticas...

Envio do Google:  

"Paulo Roberto de Almeida"
Atualização diária  23 de setembro de 2021
NOTÍCIAS 
Já o diplomata Paulo Roberto de Almeida, ex-diretor do Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais (IPRI) definiu assim o discurso do presidente.
FacebookTwitterSinalizar como irrelevante 
Paulo Roberto de Almeida afirmou que os diplomatas devem ter se decepcionado ao perceber que o discurso de Bolsonaro na ONU foi feito com base em conselhos ...
FacebookTwitterSinalizar como irrelevante 
Paulo Roberto de Almeida afirmou que o presidente da República fez um "discurso de vereador para o público interno" na ONU. “O mundo já conhece Bolsonaro, ...
FacebookTwitterSinalizar como irrelevante 
No post do presidente, a foto que acompanha os itens da fala às Nações Unidas —corretamente classificada pelo embaixador Paulo Roberto de Almeida como ...

sábado, 27 de fevereiro de 2021

Como anda este blog, nos últimos seis meses? Retratos do Diplomatizzando entre agosto de 2020 e fevereiro de 2021

 Em agosto de 2020, "tirei um retrato" das minhas estatísticas relativas ao blog Diplomatizzando. Vou refazer os dados agora, como forma de comparação, mas já reparei que o Google aplicou melhores filtros, o que permitiu evitar repetições ou homonimia, a verificar os dados abaixo (em azul):


Agosto de 2020:

Se eu coloco o meu nome no Google, assim, sem nada, o resultado é assustador: 

Aproximadamente 44.400.000 resultados (0,46 segundos) 

Mas, tem muita repetição, muitos homônimos, muitos nomes parciais coincidentes.
Mesmo cortando pela metade, fica ainda exagerado: 22.200 milhões.
Cortemos ainda pela metade; ainda assim parece exagero: 11.100 milhões.
Vamos cortar em três, então, o que dá: 3,7 milhões, o que é ainda enorme.
 
Fevereiro de 2021: 28.300.000 resultados

Então, coloquemos o nome entre aspas, com o qualificativo de "diplomata".
Aí já está razoável: Aproximadamente 1.070 resultados (0,49 segundos) 

Fevereiro de 2021: Aproximadamente 1.670 resultados
 
Se eu colocar entre aspas, com "professor" em lugar de diplomata, aí aumenta um pouco: 
Aproximadamente 4.800 resultados
 
Fevereiro de 2021: Aproximadamente 3.400 resultados

Mas, se eu colocar os dois, "diplomata, professor", aumenta bem mais: 
Aproximadamente 283.000 resultados
 
 Fevereiro de 2021:  diminuiu bastante: Aproximadamente 321 resultados

Acho que essa é uma base razoável de reflexos de minhas muitas publicações, nos últimos 30 e poucos anos, digamos assim, desde o aparecimento da internet. Comecei em revistas acadêmicas clássicas, até aparecerem os primeiros sites gratuitos, tipo Geocities e alguns outros.
A partir de certa fase, resolvi criar o meu próprio site, e não queria ser ".com", obviamente. Mas na época tinha poucas possibilidades. Escolhi ser "org", o que pode parecer arrogância.
Depois apareceram as outras possibilidades, que reservei: net e info, mas nunca implementei.

Destinado basicamente a divulgar meus trabalhos, não com intenções narcisísticas, mas com finalidades basicamente didáticas, o site www.pralmeida.org reune meus trabalhos e outros materiais relevantes para o estudo de questões internacionais e de diplomacia brasileira.
Ele existe desde muito tempo, mas com suporte de provedores diferentes, ao sabor da ajuda técnica que pude receber, pois pessoalmente sou um inepto na linguagem html.
Não disponho de estatísticas sobre acessos, pois não sei configurar essas tecnicalidades.
Mas é no site que eu coloco a série inteira de trabalhos originais, publicados e todos os tipos de livros (próprios, editados e capítulos em obras coletivas). Tenho de fazer uma lista dos livros em Kindle, que pronto espero estarem todos.
 
Eis os links:
Livros do autor: http://pralmeida.org/autor/
Capítulos em livros coletivos: http://pralmeida.org/capitulos/

Da mesma forma, os trabalhos estão em listas geralmente anuais: 

 
Tenho no momento (Agosto de 2020): Seguidores: 899
Fevereiro de 2021:  914
Fevereiro de 2021:  22.862
Fevereiro de 2021: 9.103
Visualizações:7.885.655
Fevereiro de 2021: 8.250.813


Paulo Roberto de Almeida
Brasília, 5 de agosto de 2020
Brasília, 27 de fevereiro de 2021


domingo, 10 de novembro de 2019

Verificação de segurança na conta do Google

Acho que o Google é um pouco paranoico, mas isso pode ser bom.
Ele removeu o acesso de diversos aplicativos a meus contatos ou outras informações pessoais disponíveis em meu computador. Suponho que seja bom.
Façam isso vocês também...

Verificação de segurança
Nenhum problema encontrado