O que é este blog?

Este blog trata basicamente de ideias, se possível inteligentes, para pessoas inteligentes. Ele também se ocupa de ideias aplicadas à política, em especial à política econômica. Ele constitui uma tentativa de manter um pensamento crítico e independente sobre livros, sobre questões culturais em geral, focando numa discussão bem informada sobre temas de relações internacionais e de política externa do Brasil. Para meus livros e ensaios ver o website: www.pralmeida.org. Para a maior parte de meus textos, ver minha página na plataforma Academia.edu, link: https://itamaraty.academia.edu/PauloRobertodeAlmeida;

Meu Twitter: https://twitter.com/PauloAlmeida53

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/paulobooks

Mostrando postagens com marcador 2019. Mostrar todas as postagens
Mostrando postagens com marcador 2019. Mostrar todas as postagens

segunda-feira, 29 de julho de 2019

Visoes conflitantes na reuniao do BRICS no RJ - The Hindu

Conflicting views pervade BRICS Ministers’ meeting

Fight against terrorism, cooperation in areas of economy and people-to-people exchanges emerged as prominent themes in the one-day meet.

For a meeting set to articulate the voice of emerging countries, the BRICS Foreign Ministers’ gathering here on Friday could not have started on a more discordant note. 
Opening the meeting, Foreign Minister of Brazil Ernesto Araujo called upon fellow BRICS members — Russia, India, China and South Africa — to “act on Venezuela” in support of Juan Guaido, who proclaimed himself interim president of the South American country on January 23. Brazil holds the rotating presidency of BRICS grouping for 2019.
“There is a cry of freedom coming from Venezuela. Brazil has heard this cry… Every member of international community needs to hear this cry and act,” said Mr. Araujo spelling out his country’s vision for the BRICS Summit in November.

Conflicting views

However, following Mr. Araujo on the speaking list, Russian Foreign Minister and policy veteran Sergey Lavrov, who, also, spoke on Venezuela, took a diametrically opposite position. 
“We need to use international law as the basis for reaching a solution by themselves without outside interference,” said Mr. Lavrov, restating the Russian position.
He then called for a similar approach to the crisis in the Persian Gulf. The importance of his reference to Iran was not lost on anyone, as two Iranian ships have been stuck in a port here for days, with Brazilian oil companies refusing to provide fuel because of U.S. sanctions. 
Brazil’s new government, led by far-right President Jair Bolsonaro, has closely allied itself with U.S. President Donald Trump’s government. In such a climate, the meeting opened with a bit of uncertainty. “The BRICS Sherpas and teams of diplomats worked for days to make sure a positive agenda is set. We did not want anything negative about any particular country in it. We only want to articulate the position of the developing world,” said an Indian official who was a member of the official delegation. 
The final statement released to the media reflected a commonality of purpose among the BRICS countries. “The Ministers agreed to further deepen BRICS three-pillar-driven cooperation in the areas of economy, peace and security and people-to-people exchanges,” it said.

Fight against terrorism

The details of the statement reflect that the group of five emerging countries might now be looking for a bigger and different role in global affairs. A large part of the joint statement is devoted to “fight against terrorism”, which emerged as a major theme of the one-day meeting. In his address, General V.K. Singh (retd.), Union Minister of State for Transport, who stood in for External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar said, “All our countries have been victims of terrorism and we need to support each other to end these groups and their supporters. The BRICS has to fight to end the financing of terrorist networks in all our territories.”
Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi too during his speech called upon the BRICS countries to cooperate in combating terrorism.
The BRICS Working Group on Counter Terrorism — already in place — will hold a seminar on terrorism in Brazil from July 29 to August 2.
According to Indian officials, the inclusion of FATF in the statement is a positive move as India has been pushing for Pakistan to be put on this list for financing terrorism in the region. 
On the issue of terrorism in Afghanistan, India clearly got a shot in the arm as the BRICS statement reiterated support for “international and national efforts to achieve an Afghan-led, Afghan-owned peace and reconciliation process”. 
With the Trump government working on a deal with the Taliban, India has been almost left out of the ongoing Afghan peace process. But with China and Russia two other major stakeholders in Afghanistan reaffirming their support to an “Afghan-led, Afghan-owned” process, India can hope to still play a role in a country it has invested heavily in.

domingo, 24 de fevereiro de 2019

ESG: Curso de Altos Estudos de Política e Estratégia (2019)

O lema da ESG é: Nesta Casa estuda-se o destino do Brasil.

Curso de Altos Estudos de Política e Estratégia inicia atividades da turma 2019

No dia 18 de janeiro o Curso de Altos Estudos de Política e Estratégia (CAEPE) iniciou as atividades da turma 2019 na Escola Superior de Guerra (ESG).
Os novos estagiários foram recepcionados pelo Subcomandante da Escola,  Vice-Almirante Carlos Frederico Carneiro Primo, que deu boas-vindas em nome do Comandante, General de Exército Décio Luís Schons, e pelo Assistente Militar da Aeronáutica e diretor do curso, Brigadeiro Engenheiro Ronaldo Yuan.
Ao fazer uso da palavra, o Subcomandante salientou o ganho acadêmico e interpessoal provocados pelo compartilhamento de experiências, além da união resultante do convívio diário da turma.
Com um total de 88 estagiários, a turma 2019 conta com seis estagiários de Nações Amigas: dois da Argentina, um do Paquistão, dois do Peru e um do Uruguai.
O  CAEPE tem como objetivo preparar civis e militares do Brasil e de Nações Amigas para o exercício de funções de direção e assessoramento de alto nível na administração pública, em especial na área de Defesa Nacional.Ele também integra o Curso Superior de Defesa (CSD) junto com o Curso de Política e Estratégia Marítimas (C-PEM), Curso de Política, Estratégia e Alta Administração do Exército (CPEAEx) e  Curso de Política e Estratégia Aeroespaciais (CPEA).

terça-feira, 5 de fevereiro de 2019

Mensagem ao Congresso 2019: Brasil Nação (seleção)



BRASIL: NAÇÃO FORTE ........................................................................................... 107
1 ASSUNTOS ESTRATÉGICOS PRIORITÁRIOS.......................................................... 108 
DIPLOMACIA BILATERAL E MULTILATERAL ........................................................... 108 
3 INTEGRAÇÃO REGIONAL ........................................................................................ 113 
4 COMÉRCIO EXTERIOR E DIPLOMACIA ECONÔMICA..............................................117 
5 COMUNIDADES BRASILEIRAS NO EXTERIOR E TEMAS MIGRATÓRIOS............... 121 
6 COOPERAÇÃO INTERNACIONAL ............................................................................ 123 
7 SEGURANÇA, DEFESA E INTELIGÊNCIA ................................................................ 124 






























quarta-feira, 26 de setembro de 2018

Liga das Nações: conferencia internacional - Lisboa, setembro 2019

by Aurora Almada e Santos
Call for Papers
Lisbon, 19-20 September 2019
Intergovernmental organizations – understood as multilateral institutions created by sovereign states, with their own permanent structures and charged with the long-term pursuit of common goals – are tools for promoting the peaceful resolution of conflicts and facilitating cooperation. By establishing permanent dialogue between governments and trying to promote cooperative relations between peoples at a global level, intergovernmental organizations are a fundamental new element of global politics in the contemporary era. The genealogy and nature of intergovernmental organizations has therefore been the subject of highly relevant political controversy as well as significant debate in academia.
Established in January 1920, at the end of the First World War, the League of Nations was the first permanent multilateral organization set up to maintain peace and collective security, aiming at promoting a new stable and prosperous international order. Although it was meant to be in principle a global organization, European states de facto were the central core of founding members. After a decade, it became increasingly clear that the League’s performance in addressing major conflicts did not live up to the expectations of guarantying the collective security of member states. Resolutions and sanctions were ineffective against increasingly violent conflicts. In the functional areas, regarding minority rights and in the oversight of the role of imperial powers in mandate territories, the League of Nations created an important precedent but also showed important limitations.
With the suspension of the activities of the League of Nations with the beginning of the Second World War and its subsequent replacement came the idea of a total failure of the League of Nations. But current studies have pointed in new directions in the analysis of the knowledge of the organization. This rehabilitation of the importance of the critical study of the League of Nations has led to new and different readings of its various facets. It is, nevertheless, important to pursue these new approaches not only from an institutional perspective, but also by a more multidimensional and comparative analysis that does greater justice to the rich and important history of the organization. The tools of International History, Global and Transnational History, History of Ideas, Comparative History, Social History, Labour History, History of Communications, History of Health, History of Migration and others allow us to consider the presence and the role of the League of Nations in various scales and spaces, as well as its relationship with a diversity of actors and themes.
The relevance of the League of Nations is also justified by how topical and important many of the issues with which it struggled still are. The growing globalization and mobility of the contemporary era, voluntary or not, generates global problems and norms with enormous national and local impact. It has been in and through intergovernmental organizations that global regimes have been defined in a variety of areas – human rights, drug trafficking, terrorism and refugees. This brings us to the controversial but arguably indispensable role of multilateral organizations in international governance, as standards-makers and managers of the problems and challenges of contemporary societies which require a global response.
To promote the debate between those who study the League of Nations and connected topics we will organize an interdisciplinary conference to be held in Lisbon on 19 and 20 September 2019.
The keynote speakers are:
- Erez Manela (Harvard University) 
- Mark Mazower (Columbia University) – to be confirmed 
- Nicolas Werth (CNRS) 
- Patricia Clavin (University of Oxford) 
- Patrick Finney (Aberystwyth University) 
- Philippe Rygiel (École Normale Supérieure - Lyon) 
- William Mulligan (University College Dublin) 

Proposals for 20-minute presentations on issues related to the League of Nations will be accepted, including but not limited to the following topics:
- The genealogy of the concept of intergovernmental organizations; 
- Concepts and methodologies for the study of intergovernmental organizations; 
- History of intergovernmental organizations; 
- The Paris peace talks, the Peace Treaties and the creation of the League of Nations; 
- Institutional structure and dynamics of the League of Nations; 
- The League of Nations and the relationship with its member states; 
- The League of Nations and international civil service; 
- The League of Nations and international peace and security; 
- The League of Nations and the rights of minorities and refugees; 
- The League of Nations, empires and international mandates; 
- The League of Nations, social issues and the International Labour Organization (ILO); 
- The League of Nations and technical areas; 
- The League of Nations and non-state actors; 
- The League of Nations and other international organizations; 
- The League of Nations, international law and justice; 
- The transition from the League of Nations to the United Nations (UN). 

Abstracts of presentations (300 words) and biographical notes (250 words) should be sent in English or French or Portuguese to: sdnconferencialisboa@gmail.com

Deadline for submission of abstracts: 31 October 2018

Date of notification of acceptance: 15 December 2018.
N.B. Submissions can be made in English, French or Portuguese. However, to facilitate debate the organizers encourage participants to use English in their oral presentation.
A publication of some of the papers presented at the conference is a future aim.
The registration will have a fee of 25 EUR. 

Organizing Committee
Aurora Almada e Santos (IHC – NOVA FCSH) 
Cristina Rodrigues (IHC – NOVA FCSH) 
Bruno Cardoso Reis (ISCTE-IUL) 
João Paulo Avelãs Nunes (CEIS20 – Universidade de Coimbra) 
Pedro Aires Oliveira (IHC – NOVA FCSH) 
Yvette Santos (IHC – NOVA FCSH)

Scientific Committee
Álvaro Garrido (CEIS20 – Universidade de Coimbra) 
Aurora Almada e Santos (IHC – NOVA FCSH) 
Bruno Cardoso Reis (ISCTE-IUL) 
Cristina Rodrigues (IHC – NOVA FCSH) 
Erez Manela (Harvard University) 
Fernando Tavares Pimenta (IPRI – NOVA FCSH) 
Filipe Ribeiro Meneses (Maynooth University) 
Hipolito de la Torre Gómez (UNED) 
Luís Nuno Rodrigues (ISCTE-IUL) 
Maria Manuela Tavares Ribeiro (CEIS20 – Universidade de Coimbra) 
Mark Mazower (Columbia University) 
Nicolas Werth (CNRS) 
Patricia Clavin (University of Oxford) 
Patrick Finney (Aberystwyth University) 
Pedro Aires Oliveira (IHC – NOVA FCSH) 
Philippe Rygiel (École Normale Supérieure - Lyon) 
William Mulligan (University College Dublin) 
Yvette Santos (IHC – NOVA FCSH)

Institutional Sponsorship 

Diplomatic Institute / Portuguese Ministry for Foreign Affairs