Solidariedade "socialista" foi para o espaco? E o internacionalismo proletario?

Pois é, parece que não ficou nada da antiga chama, da união dos povos na mesma causa socialista, agora só atuam pela vil moeda capitalista, sem qualquer respeito pelas antigas tradições de irmandade da boa causa.
Cuba, que viveu de "mensalão" dos irmãos socialistas durante praticamente toda a existência da ditadura dos irmãos Castro, agora precisa pagar, com juros, o dinheiro recebido...
Triste sina, tristes tempos...
Paulo Roberto de Almeida

Cuba debe 1,200 mdd al Estado rumano, según Bucarest
Bucarest – EFE
El Universal, 27/11/2012

Cuba adeuda unos 1,200 millones de dólares a Rumanía por los créditos concedidos a los “países amigos” durante el régimen comunista de Nicolae Ceausescu, informó hoy el diario local Adevarul con datos del Ministerio de Finanzas.

Según la administración pública, la deuda del país caribeño asciende a 1.300 millones de rublos soviéticos, utilizados hasta 1991, y que con la conversión de las autoridades rumanas supondrían unos 1.200 millones de dólares actuales.

La recuperación del dinero choca con el “absoluto rechazo de las autoridades cubanas, que acaparan el 100 % de la deuda rumana en rublos, a aceptar el inicio de las negociaciones para convenir el coeficiente de la conversión del rublo al dólar y establecer una modalidad de reembolso”, precisa el Ministerio de Finanzas.

En total, Rumanía aún tiene que recuperar unos 2.355 millones de dólares de las deudas contraídas durante el pasado régimen comunista, y además de Cuba, los mayores deudores son Irak y Sudán, según las fuentes del Ministerio de Finanzas.

A finales de los años 70 y a lo largo de la década de los 80, todos los productos de calidad rumanos (madera, cristal, alimentos) se exportaron para eliminar la deuda externa, lo que provocó malestar social entre la población.

A deterioracao da democracia na Europa - editorial do Washington Post

Excelente editorial do Washington Post, que nos lembra que a democracia e as instituições públicas de modo geral enfrentam um processo sustentado e deliberado de deterioração de suas qualidades, em função de populistas de esquerda que visam consolidar poder, não apenas na América Latina, mas na própria Europa, onde a UE foi solícita demais, e tolerante em excesso, em acomodar demandas de ingresso na comunidade, por rebentos ainda não estabilizados como essas satrapias do ex-império soviético, ou de adesão, a exemplo da Grécia, numa zona monetária que deveria possuir mecanismos mais estritos de conformidade com as regras de estabilidade macroeconômica.
O preço a pagar são todas essas violações das regras democráticas e a erosão da estabilidade macroeconômica, a que se assiste atualmente na Europa, mas que também já foram vistas na América Latina em países pateticamente chamados de bolivarianos.
Paulo Roberto de Almeida 

The Post’s View

Romania’s repressive moves

By Editorial Board, Washington Post, July 14, 2012

COVERAGE OF THE crisis in Europe has tended to focus on economic questions, such as whether Greece or other governments will default on their debts or whether the euro currency will survive. The growing political damage to institutions, and to democracy itself, is sometimes overlooked. But in several countries there has been an alarming erosion of political comity and constitutional checks and balances, driven by populists who exploit the public’s dissatisfaction with economic hardship.

The latest example is Romania, where a new left-wing prime minister has been pressing to remove checks on his government while trying to force the country’s president from office. Victor Ponta, who took power last May without an election after two successive right-of-center coalitions collapsed, has alarmed other European Union governments as well as the Obama administration by quickly seeking to consolidate power.

In a matter of weeks the parliamentary majority controlled by the new prime minister has replaced the leaders of the two chambers — one of whom is now in line to succeed the president — as well as an ombudsman who had sole authority to appeal the government’s decrees. The Parliament also sought to strip the Constitutional Court of authority to review its decisions, and Mr. Ponta spoke of replacing court members who ruled against him.

The Parliament then impeached President Traian Basescu, a right-of-center rival of Mr. Ponta. The vote mandated a July 29 referendum on whether Mr. Basescu will remain in office. But a government emergency decree and parliamentary legislation changed the rules for the vote so that impeachment could be ratified by a majority of those voting, rather than a majority of all registered voters.

Faced with an outcry from E.U. leaders, some of whom hinted that Romania could face sanctions, Mr. Ponta has appeared to retreat slightly. This week he said he supported aConstitutional Court ruling that would require a turnout of a majority of voters in the impeachment referendum in order for the results to be valid. That could ensure that Mr. Basescu remains in office, since many Romanians appear likely to skip the dog-days voting.

The revised voting rules must still be approved by Parliament, however, and Mr. Ponta’s campaign is not over: He will seek his own mandate in a general election this year. He is promising to reverse the stringent austerity Romania has endured since 2009, when it was forced to seek a bailout from the International Monetary Fund. Though relatively effective, the program prompted a popular backlash and street demonstrations that caused the downfall of the previous center-right coalition.

Contrarily, Mr. Ponta is also promising his E.U. interlocutors that he will stick to Romania’s international agreements, including one with the IMF. But the financial market’s view of his rhetoric has been reflected in the plunging value of Romania’s currency and a rise in its borrowing costs. Sooner or later, Romanians will discover that, as in the rest of Europe, there is no quick or easy solution to their economic problems — especially when it involves short-circuiting democracy.