O que é este blog?

Este blog trata basicamente de ideias, se possível inteligentes, para pessoas inteligentes. Ele também se ocupa de ideias aplicadas à política, em especial à política econômica. Ele constitui uma tentativa de manter um pensamento crítico e independente sobre livros, sobre questões culturais em geral, focando numa discussão bem informada sobre temas de relações internacionais e de política externa do Brasil. Para meus livros e ensaios ver o website: www.pralmeida.org. Para a maior parte de meus textos, ver minha página na plataforma Academia.edu, link: https://itamaraty.academia.edu/PauloRobertodeAlmeida;

Meu Twitter: https://twitter.com/PauloAlmeida53

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/paulobooks

Mostrando postagens com marcador International Relations. Mostrar todas as postagens
Mostrando postagens com marcador International Relations. Mostrar todas as postagens

segunda-feira, 18 de dezembro de 2023

Foreign Affairs some of the best books on international relations

 

The Economic Government of the World, 1933–2023


By Martin Daunton

Daunton’s sweeping narrative assesses the history of international economic cooperation and the institutions that organize and sustain it.

READ THE REVIEW

Daunton has written a sweeping history of international economic cooperation and of the meetings and institutions through which it is organized. The author’s original design for this book, many years in the making, was evidently to begin his narrative with the London Economic Conference of 1933, which failed to preserve an open international order, and conclude with the more successful G-20 summit in London in 2009, which mobilized international efforts to contain the 2008 global financial crisis and stabilize the world economy. Whereas the first of these conferences was sunk by doctrinal disagreements and international political disputes, the second benefited from the intellectual and political convergence that followed the fall of communism and the end of the Cold War. Developments in the past decade, however, have thrown the author’s optimistic narrative a series of curve balls: the resurgence of populism, tensions between China and the United States, and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, which put an end to political convergence and inaugurated what some call a “new Cold War.” Progress in strengthening global governance, it turns out, is not inevitable. Institutions such as the International Monetary Fund and the World Trade Organization retain a role in fostering international cooperation, but Daunton insists that they must not interfere too extensively in domestic policy choices lest they spark a backlash. To sustain international cooperation, governments must complement openness with policies that create good jobs, provide social insurance, tax footloose corporations, and avoid destabilizing capital flows.

From Amazon.com:

An epic history of the people and institutions that have built the global economy since the Great Depression.

In this vivid landmark history, the distinguished economic historian Martin Daunton pulls back the curtain on the institutions and individuals who have created and managed the global economy over the last ninety years, revealing how and why one economic order breaks down and another is built. During the Great Depression, trade and currency warfare led to the rise of economic nationalism―a retreat from globalization that culminated in war. From the Second World War came a new, liberal economic order. Squarely reflecting the interests of the West in the Cold War, liberalism faced collapse in the 1970s and was succeeded by neoliberalism, financialization, and hyper-globalization.

Now, as leading nations are tackling the fallout from COVID-19 and threats of inflation, food insecurity, and climate change, Daunton calls for a return to a more just and equitable form of globalization. Western imperial powers have overwhelmingly determined the structures of world economic government, often advancing their own self-interests and leading to ruinous resource extraction, debt, poverty, and political and social instability in the Global South. He argues that while our current economic system is built upon the politics of and between the world’s biggest economies, a future of global recovery―and the reduction of economic inequality―requires the development of multilateral institutions.

Dramatic and revelatory, 
The Economic Government of the World offers a powerful analysis of the origins of our current global crises and a path toward a fairer international order.”


Neal’s highly entertaining biography of the writer Carleton Beals, whose work on Latin America foreshadowed later anti-imperialist critiques, sheds light on the United States’ relationship with the ruling elites of Latin America throughout the twentieth century.

READ THE REVIEW

Neal admires the fierce intellectual independence and penetrating, skeptical eye of Carleton Beals, who died in 1979 at the age of 85. Beals was a remarkably prolific freelance writer of some 40 books and innumerable magazine articles that skewered the ruling elites of Latin America and their U.S. sponsors. As recorded in Neal’s highly entertaining biography, Beals’s best books, enriched by his extensive travels, offered colorful, often acerbic portraits of the leading political and intellectual figures of the day. His biggest scoop, a 1928 exclusive interview with Augusto Sandino, pictured the Nicaraguan guerrilla fighter as a romantic patriot battling against a misguided U.S. military intervention. Something of a celebrity in progressive intellectual circles, Beals foreshadowed the later anti-imperialist critiques of William Appleman Williams and Noam Chomsky and the popularity in academic circles of dependency theory, the notion that globalization impoverishes poorer countries. Like many left-leaning, politically engaged writers, Beals wavered between demanding that the U.S. government keep its hands off Latin America and urging Washington to put its thumb on the scales for progressive democrats.

In this splendid, well-balanced history of an extraordinary but seldom studied period in inter-American relations, Herman argues that pragmatic accords between the United States and Latin American countries enabled a brilliant if brief chapter of solidarity in the Western Hemisphere throughout World War II.

READ THE REVIEW




In this wide-ranging and shrewd analysis of the Chinese state, Huang predicts that the crackdown on freedom under Chinese leader Xi Jinping’s modernized version of imperial rule may bring an end to the country’s brief spurt of dynamism.

READ THE REVIEW


segunda-feira, 11 de outubro de 2021

New books in International Relations, Foreign Policy and Diplomatic History - H-Diplo

 Alguns interessam...

H-Diplo New Books Newsletter for October 2021

by George Fujii

The H-Diplo New Books Newsletter, October 2021 issue

Editors: Fred Edwards and Kaete O’Connell, editorial-diplo@mail.h-net.org
Production Editor: George Fujii

Byrnes, Sean T. Disunited Nations: US Foreign Policy, Anti-Americanism, and the Rise of the New Right. LSU Press, 2021. ISBN: 9780807175286.

Carvin, Stephanie. Stand on Guard: Reassessing Threats to Canada’s National Security. University of Toronto Press, 2021. ISBN: 9781487524517.

Friedman, Jeremy. Ripe for Revolution: Building Socialism in the Third World. Harvard University Press, 2021. ISBN: 9780674244313.

Hanhimäki, Jussi M. Pax Transatlantica: America and Europe in the Post-Cold War Era. Oxford University Press, 2021. ISBN: 9780190922160.

Helleiner, Eric. The Neomercantilists: A Global Intellectual History. Cornell University Press, 2021. ISBN: 9781501760129.

Richmond, Sean. Unbound in War? International Law in Canada and Britain’s Participation in the Korean War and Afghanistan Conflict. University of Toronto Press, 2021. ISBN: 9781487503468.

Roland, Alex. Delta of Power: The Military-Industrial Complex. Johns Hopkins University Press, 2021. ISBN: 9781421441818.

Shannon, Matthew K., ed. American-Iranian Dialogues: From Constitution to White Revolution, c. 1890s-1960s. Bloomsbury Academic, 2021. ISBN: 9781350118720.

Zaidi, Waqar H. Technological Internationalism and World Order: Aviation, Atomic Energy, and the Search for International Peace, 1920–1950. Cambridge University Press, 2021. ISBN: 9781108872416.

quinta-feira, 3 de setembro de 2020

Money talks: China’s approach to international relations - Louise Hossein

Money talks: China’s approach to international relations
Louise Hossein analyses Andrew Marr's interview with Chinese Ambassador to the UK, Liu Xiaoming.
Cherwell, 3rd September 2020

Since Xi Jinping’s appointment as Chairman, a slow yet steady process of ‘tightening up’ has happened in China. On the global stage, this has resulted in accusations of violations of human rights, freedom and security. Recently, Liu Xiaoming, the Chinese Ambassador to the UK, appeared on The Andrew Marr Show to address several key issues that China is facing pushback for, including the new national safety law in Hong Kong, the persecution of the Uighur ethnic group, and Huawei 5G technology. The results revealed a lot about the Chinese Communist Party’s stance on international relations and how it feels it should be viewed on the global stage.  
On the 14th June, Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, and Sport Oliver Dowden announced that from the end of this year, it will be illegal for UK telecoms operators to buy 5G equipment from Chinese tech giant Huawei. Dowden also stated that all Huawei technology must be removed from use by 2027. This comes as another blow to the Chinese tech company, which has already been blacklisted by the US, with President Trump urging other countries to consider a similar ban. When asked about this, Liu Xiaoming was quick to emphasise that such bans were a mistake, going as far as to compare it to when the Qianlong Emperor told the British that China had no need for their manufacturing in the 18th century. He seemed to warn that the UK may face a similar 150-year decline as a consequence. However, what Liu fails to see is that the actions taken by the Chinese Communist Party over the last 5 or so years have directly resulted in the discord between China and the UK. 
Since 2017, evidence has appeared to show that the Uighur people of Xinjiang, a Muslim ethnic minority living near the Western border of China, have been facing mass detainment. Following the CCP’s crackdown on “terrorism”, it has been estimated that a million or more Uighurs have been sent to “re-education camps”. The Chinese government, who initially would not even acknowledge that such camps existed, now maintain that these camps are simply what is necessary for the security and safety of the Chinese people. However, document leaks to the ICJI state that these camps aim to “resolve ideological contradictions and to guide students away from bad emotion […] so that they can understand deeply the illegal, criminal and dangerous nature of their past behaviour”. They also read that the camps are highly secure to prevent escapes. Perhaps for someone who was found guilty of plotting an attack, these kinds of measures may seem reasonable, but a leaked document known as the Karakax List shows that Uighur people have been detained for innocent actions such as visiting certain foreign countries or lacking Mandarin ability. Adding to this the Uighur testimonies which tell stories of awful, unlawful acts being forced upon them, including forced sterilisation, it seems to me quite blatant that China is in violation of international law. 
However, when Marr asked Liu about the situation, he responded first with “Have you been to Xinjiang?”, as if to say, “What do you know about it?”. When confronted with the video of a Uighur woman crying as she explains the horrific story of her forced sterilisation, Liu proceeded to talk over the top of the video, almost as if it was not playing. He maintained the standard party line that the Chinese Communist Party has brought prosperity and growth to the border region – which is true to some extent – but failed to acknowledge that there has been an influx of the Han ethnicity (the majority ethnicity in China) and the unfair favouritism that they have received. He also fails to mention that the Uighur language has been under attack for two decades with many Uighur speaking teachers being made redundant, and the anti-sanhua campaign which aims to wipe out halal, Arab-style dress and Saudi-style mosque buildings that is currently in action. The most disappointing thing about the CCP’s response to the dissatisfaction of a minority of the Uighur people is that they refuse to consider the socio-economic aspects of life within the region which may be the root of the supposed “issue” and have taken incredibly severe measures which violate even their own constitution.  
2020 has also seen the introduction of new state security legislature in Hong Kong which was forced through by Chinese mainland officials in May. The introduction of the new law brings fears that the mainland will exploit the judiciary independence of Hong Kong, affecting both residents’ and non-residents’ rights to freedom of speech and judiciary autonomy. On the 20th July, Foreign Secretary, Dominic Raab, announced that the UK would suspend sales of arms equipment to the region and the extradition treaty which it originally had with Hong Kong, as well as implementing an immigration route for BNOs which will be ready by 2021.  Thus, the line was drawn. As Raab himself pointed out, economically and technologically, positive UK-China relations are important, but these violations of the freedom and independence of the Hong Kong people cannot go unnoticed. 
But that really is the key point, the undertone to Liu Xiaoming’s interview seemed to be “turn a blind eye to our domestic affairs and focus on the economic benefit which we can bring to you”. Many a time I have wondered in disbelief as to why the Chinese Communist Party must take such severe actions against its own people, using methods which violate the standards and values (supposedly) upheld on a global level. Liu’s interview has prompted my conclusion that the CCP believes only economic affairs are relevant to international relations, and that their domestic affairs should simply be ignored on the global stage. The fact that China is facing such pushback is perhaps a double-standard: many countries turn a blind eye to the internal affairs of the US for example, but just because not all problems have been called out, does not mean that no issues should be called out at all. Any steps taken to hold Beijing accountable for their actions on the global stage are worthwhile and important.  
Thus, China’s international relations have reached an interesting position. Due to economic investment and relations maintained from the early Reform and Opening period, China has strong alliances with many nations, including Russia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Nigeria and the Philippines – all of whom signed a joint statement commending China’s “counter-terrorism” work in Xinjiang. What we can read from this is that China, who is second in line for the title of world hegemony, provides a stable power base for countries that may not be so willing to cooperate with the US propagated world system. On the other side, there is a group of predominantly European countries, as well as the US and Japan, who are willing to take a stricter policy towards China. There is inherently a discord between the two systems – those countries who ally with China may do so mainly for economic reasons and perhaps protection from the West, those who consider China critically are more confident in their place in the global system and are unlikely to back down. Only time will tell how the subsequent tension will play out. 

quinta-feira, 27 de junho de 2019

Theory Talks: exposições sobre Relações Internacionais


Theory Talks


Theory Talks is an interactive forum for discussion of debates in International Relations with an emphasis of the underlying theoretical issues. By frequently inviting cutting-edge specialists in the field to elucidate their work and to explain current developments both in IR theory and real-world politics, Theory Talks aims to offer both scholars and students a comprehensive view of the field and its most important protagonists.


We invite you to react and leave any kind of comment, question or suggestion – the invitees frequently respond to comments and welcome any contribution to ongoing debate. Learn how you can participate on the page ‘You Talk!’.



 
Theory Talk #2: Martin Shaw - War & World State
 
Theory Talk #4: John Agnew - Power & Geopolitics
 
Theory Talk #6: Klaus Dodds - Visual Geopolitics & South Pole
 
Theory Talk #8: Arend Lijphart - Democracy & Power Sharing
 
Theory Talk #10: Timothy Shaw - BRICs & Global South
 
Theory Talk #12: Robert Jervis - Realism & Bush Administration
 
Theory Talk #14: Geoffrey Underhill - State-Market Condominium & Adam Smith

Theory Talk #16: Robert Hayden - Constitutional Anthropology & Balkans
 
Theory Talk #18: James Fearon - Ethnicity & Security Council

Theory Talk #19: Fredrik Söderbaum - NRA & Africa
 
Theory Talk #21: Stephen Krasner - Sovereignty & Failed States
 
Theory Talk #23: Kees van der Pijl - Empires & Left-Wing
 
Theory Talk #25: Antonio Marquina - Energy & Security
 
Theory Talk #27: Christian Reus-Smit - Re-thinking IR & Cultures
 
Theory Talk #29: Peter Singer - Private Soldiers & Robots

Theory Talk #31: Bruce Bueno de Mesquita - Game Theory & Fear
 
Theory Talk #32: Miriam Elman - Lakatos & Progress
 
Theory Talk #34: James Ferguson - Foucault & Lesotho

Theory Talk #36: Michael Shapiro - Pictures & Political Philosophy

Theory Talk #38: James Scott - Agriculture & Resistance

Theory Talk #40: Kenneth Waltz - Economic Theory & International Politics

Theory Talk #42: Amitav Acharya - ASEAN & Bhagavad Gita

Theory Talk #44: Patrick Jackson - IR & Philosophy of Science
 
Theory Talk #46: David Lake - International Hierarchy & Open Economy Politics

Theory Talk #48: Cynthia Enloe - Militarization & Bananas

Theory Talk #50: Beate Jahn - Classical Theory & the State of Nature

Theory Talk #52: Iver Neumann - Practices & Diplomacy

Theory Talk #53: Ned Lebow - Self-Esteem & Foxes
 
Theory Talk #55: Mary King - Arab Awakening & Nonviolence

Theory Talk #56: Keith Hart - Informal Economy & Nollywood
 
Theory Talk #58: Daniel Levine - Vocation & Critique

Theory Talk #59: Timothy Mitchell - Technopolitics & Oil
 
Theory Talk #62: Karen Litfin - Ecovillages & Gaia Theory
 
Theory Talk #64: Gabrielle Hecht - Postcolonial Technopolitics & Nuclearity
 
Theory Talk #65: Jordan Branch - Cartography & State Formation
 
Theory Talk #67: Dirk Messner - Science, Technology & Global Change

Theory Talk #69: Eyal Weizman - Architecture & Forensics

Theory Talk #71: John Hobson - Eurocentrism & Historical Sociology
 
Theory Talk #73: Kimberly Hutchings - Quiet & Critique




 
Theory Talk #1: Michael Doyle - Markets & Institutions

Theory Talk #3: Alexander Wendt - Social Constructivism & UFO's

Theory Talk #5: Timothy Sinclair - Social Forces & Transnational Corporations
 
Theory Talk #7: Joseph Nye - Soft Power & The US
 
Theory Talk #9: Robert Keohane - Institutions & Innovation
 
Theory Talk #11: Peter Haas - Environment & Governance
 
Theory Talk #13: Immanuel Wallerstein - World-System & Capitalism
 
Theory Talk #15: Peter Katzenstein - Anti-Americanism & Analytical Eclecticism
 
Theory Talk #17: Jerry Cohen - Currency Wars & Systemic Change
 
Theory Talk #20: David Harvey - Marxism & Urbanization
 
Theory Talk #22: Kevin Dunn - Identity & Africa
 
Theory Talk #24: Robert Bates - Coffee & Small-N
 
Theory Talk #26: Jennifer Mitzen - Ontological Security & Addictive Wars
 
Theory Talk #28: Marysia Zalewski - Gender & War
 
Theory Talk #30: Mary Kaldor - Old & New Wars
 
Theory Talk #33: Stephen Walt - Israel Lobby & Obama
 
Theory Talk #35: Barry Buzan - Security & International Society

Theory Talk #37: Robert Cox - World Order & Historical Change

Theory Talk #39: Abrahamsen & Williams - Private Security & Global Assemblages
 
Theory Talk #41: Mark Duffield - Liberal aid & Fortified Compounds

Theory Talk #43: Saskia Sassen - Sociology & Global Cities

Theory Talk #45: Qin Yaqing - Chinese IR & International Balance

Theory Talk #47: Jean-François Bayart - Historicity & State Formation

Theory Talk #49: John Mearsheimer - Structural Realism & Disciplining the US

Theory Talk #51: Yan Xuetong - China & Harmony
 
Theory Talk #54: Ann Tickner - Feminism & Critical Theory

Theory Talk #57: Siba Grovogui - Theory & Theology

Theory Talk #60: Daniel Deudney - Mixed Ontology & Republican Greenpeace
 
Theory Talk #61: Pinar Bilgin - Civilization & Monsters
 
Theory Talk #63: Siddarth Mallavarapu - Multiple Voices & India
 
Theory Talk #66: Alexander Dugin - Eurasianism & Multipolarity
 
Theory Talk #68: Loet Leydesdorff - Triple Helix & Innovation
 
Theory Talk #70: Nicholas Onuf - Social Constructivism & Turns

Theory Talk #72: Robert Wade - World Bank & Zombie Ideas

Theory Talk #74: Bertrand Badie - Power & Suffering