O que é este blog?

Este blog trata basicamente de ideias, se possível inteligentes, para pessoas inteligentes. Ele também se ocupa de ideias aplicadas à política, em especial à política econômica. Ele constitui uma tentativa de manter um pensamento crítico e independente sobre livros, sobre questões culturais em geral, focando numa discussão bem informada sobre temas de relações internacionais e de política externa do Brasil. Para meus livros e ensaios ver o website: www.pralmeida.org. Para a maior parte de meus textos, ver minha página na plataforma Academia.edu, link: https://itamaraty.academia.edu/PauloRobertodeAlmeida;

Meu Twitter: https://twitter.com/PauloAlmeida53

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/paulobooks

Mostrando postagens com marcador Anonymous. Mostrar todas as postagens
Mostrando postagens com marcador Anonymous. Mostrar todas as postagens

quarta-feira, 13 de novembro de 2019

Um Anônimo quer encerrar o contrato de trabalho de Trump como presidente: ele tem direito, nós também

  • “A Warning,” by the anonymous White House official who published an explosive Op-Ed in The Times last year, is the most unusual memoir to emerge from President Trump’s administration, following books by former government officials like James B. Comey and Andrew G. McCabe. Read our critic Jennifer Szalai’s review here, and read more about the book’s back story.
Tony Cenicola/The New York Times

Book Review: In ‘A Warning,’ Anonymous Author Makes Case Against Re-election



The same official who wrote an Opinion essay in 2018 argues in a new book that the president’s contract shouldn’t be renewed.

When you purchase an independently reviewed book through our site, we earn an affiliate commission.

“Trust me”: It’s a tired cliché, a throwaway line, but when you first encounter it in “A Warning,” the new book by “Anonymous,” who is identified here only as “a senior Trump administration official,” it lands with a startling thud. Any revealing details have been explicitly and deliberately withheld to protect this person’s identity. Who is this “me” that we’re supposed to trust?
It’s a question that the anonymous author — who wrote an Op-Ed for The Timeslast year about resisting the president’s “more misguided impulses” — might have anticipated, given how much of the book is devoted to the necessity of “character” and to quoting dead presidents by name.
Not to mention this individual’s own conspicuous failures of judgment thus far. You don’t even have to take it from me; you can take it from Anonymous. “Many reasonable people voted for Trump because they love their country, wanted to shake up the establishment, and felt that the alternative was worse,” Anonymous writes. “I know you because I’ve felt the same way.” A mildly chastened Anonymous now seems to recognize, somewhat belatedly, that President Trump’s peddling of birtherism conspiracy theories and his boasts about grabbing women’s genitals might have constituted their own kind of warning — plausible evidence that Mr. Trump might not magically transform into the dignified statesman Anonymous so desperately wanted him to be.
Anonymous even admits that the thesis of the Op-Ed in The Times — the essay that led directly to the existence of this book, and was published just over a year ago — was “dead wrong” too.
Attempts by the “adults in the room” to impose some discipline on a frenzied (or nonexistent) decision-making process in the White House were “just a wet Band-Aid that wouldn’t hold together a gaping wound,” Anonymous writes. The members of the “Steady State” (the term “Deep State” clearly stings) have done everything they can, to no avail. Anonymous is passing the baton to “voters and their elected representatives” — only now the baton is a flaming stick of dynamite.
“A Warning,” then, is just that: a warning, for those who need it, that electing Mr. Trump to a second term would be courting disaster. “The president has failed to rise to the occasion in fulfilling his duties,” Anonymous intones. The book’s publisher and agents apparently referred to the manuscript as the “December Project,” though the publication date was moved up to this month when the House announced an impeachment inquiry.
“I realize that writing this while the president is still in office is an extraordinary step,” Anonymous says. In light of three years’ worth of resignations, tell-all books, reports about emoluments and sworn testimony about quid pro quos, this is a decidedly minimalist definition of “extraordinary.” How can a book that has been denuded of anything too specific do anything more than pale against a formal whistle-blower complaint?
It’s hard to look like a heroic truth teller by comparison, but Anonymous tries very hard, presenting anonymity as not just convenient but an ultimately selfless act, designed to force everyone to pay more attention to what this book says by deflecting attention away from the person who’s saying it. “Removing my identity from the equation deprives him of an opportunity to create a distraction,” Anonymous writes, referring to Mr. Trump’s compulsion for attacking his critics. “What will he do when there is no person to attack, only an idea?”
Anonymous has seen disturbing things. Anonymous has heard disturbing things. You, the reader, will already recognize most of what Anonymous has seen and heard as revealed in this book if you have been paying any attention to the news. Did you know that the president isn’t much of a reader? That he’s inordinately fond of autocrats? That “he stumbles, slurs, gets confused, is easily irritated, and has trouble synthesizing information”?
“A Warning,” Anonymous says, is intended for a “broad audience,” though to judge by the parade of bland, methodical arguments (Anonymous loves to qualify criticisms with a lawyerly “in fairness”), the ideal reader would seem to be an undecided voter who has lived in a cave for the past three years, and is irresistibly moved by quotations from Teddy Roosevelt and solemn invocations of Cicero.
Plenty of people have preemptively criticized this book as an opportunistic grift, though Anonymous has announced a plan to donate a portion of the royalties to “nonprofit organizations that focus on government accountability,” including the White House Correspondents’ Association. Besides, everything in the text of “A Warning” suggests a dyed-in-the-wool establishment Republican. There’s the typical talk about American exceptionalism and national security. There’s the eternal complaint that President Barack Obama was “out of touch with mainstream America.” There’s a wistful elegy for “our budget-balancing daydreams.” Yes, Anonymous is happy about the conservative judicial appointments, the deregulation, the tax cuts; what rankles is the “unbecoming” behavior, the “unseemly antics.”
A big tell comes early on, when Anonymous reveals what “the last straw” was. It wasn’t Mr. Trump’s response to the right-wing rally in Charlottesville, Va., in 2017, when a white supremacist killed a woman and the president talked about “the violence on many sides.” It wasn’t even the administration’s separation of migrant families at the border. These examples might have left Anonymous appalled, but the truly unforgivable act was when Senator John McCain died last year and Mr. Trump tried to hoist the flag on the White House above half-staff: “President Trump, in unprecedented fashion, was determined to use his office to limit the nation’s recognition of John McCain’s legacy.”
Anonymous says that the president “deserves to be fired,” but that’s just the author indulging in a little rhetorical flourish; what Anonymous really means is that the president’s contract shouldn’t be renewed. Actively seeking to remove Mr. Trump from office, whether by invoking the 25th Amendment or pursuing impeachment proceedings, would be “bad” because “we can scarcely afford further disunion.” Mr. Trump, Anonymous says, should simply not be elected to a second term; only then can the country “undertake the arduous task of moral repair” and “restore the soul of its political system.” 
Anonymous declares that this “American spirit” was best exemplified by the bravery shown by the passengers on United Flight 93, who rushed the cockpit on 9/11. We’ve seen Flight 93 used as a conservative analogy before — by another anonymous author no less, writing under the pen name Publius Decius Mus, who argued before the 2016 presidential election that “a Hillary Clinton presidency is Russian Roulette with a semi-auto” and consequently that voting for Mr. Trump offered the only chance for the republic’s survival.
That the same violent tragedy has been deployed to argue one point and then, three years later, to argue its utter opposite is, to put it charitably, bizarre. But then Anonymous, a self-described “student of history,” doesn’t seem to register the discrepancy. Nor does Anonymous square the analogy with an episode mentioned in the opening pages of “A Warning” — of senior officials contemplating a replay of the Nixon administration’s so-called Saturday Night Massacre by resigning en masse. The idea of doing anything so bold was floated within the first two years of the Trump administration, and then abandoned.
Toward the end of the book, an earlier quote from Mr. Trump kept coming back to me, unbidden: “These are just words. A bunch of words. It doesn’t mean anything.”
A WARNING
By Anonymous
272 pages. Twelve. $30.
Follow New York Times Books on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram, sign up for our newsletter or our literary calendar. And listen to us on the Book Review podcast.



sexta-feira, 8 de novembro de 2019

Os EUA no limiar de uma grande revolta do próprio Estado contra Trump (NYT)

Em livros, um autor anônimo argumenta que o "contrato" de Trump não deveria ser renovado em 2020. O mesmo autor argumentou que altos funcionários da administração Trump consideraram renunciaram em massa, para protestar contra as políticas equivocadas do presidente...
Esperemos que o façam antes das eleições...
Paulo Roberto de Almeida

In ‘A Warning,’ Anonymous Author Makes Case Against Re-election
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/07/books/review/a-warning-anonymous-book-review-trump.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share

In ‘A Warning,’ Anonymous Author Makes Case Against Re-election

The same writer who penned an Opinion essay in 2018 argues in a new book that the president’s contract shouldn’t be renewed.
Twelve Books

“Trust me”: It’s a tired cliché, a throwaway line, but when you first encounter it in “A Warning,” the new book by “Anonymous,” who is identified here only as “a senior Trump administration official,” it lands with a startling thud. Any revealing details have been explicitly and deliberately withheld to protect this person’s identity. Who is this “me” that we’re supposed to trust?
It’s a question that the anonymous author — who wrote an Op-Ed for The Timeslast year about resisting the president’s “more misguided impulses” — might have anticipated, given how much of the book is devoted to the necessity of “character” and to quoting dead presidents by name.
Not to mention this individual’s own conspicuous failures of judgment thus far. You don’t even have to take it from me; you can take it from Anonymous. “Many reasonable people voted for Trump because they love their country, wanted to shake up the establishment, and felt that the alternative was worse,” Anonymous writes. “I know you because I’ve felt the same way.” A mildly chastened Anonymous now seems to recognize, somewhat belatedly, that President Trump’s peddling of birtherism conspiracy theories and his boasts about grabbing women’s genitals might have constituted their own kind of warning — plausible evidence that Mr. Trump might not magically transform into the dignified statesman Anonymous so desperately wanted him to be.
Anonymous even admits that the thesis of the Op-Ed in The Times — the essay that led directly to the existence of this book, and was published just over a year ago — was “dead wrong” too.
Attempts by the “adults in the room” to impose some discipline on a frenzied (or nonexistent) decision-making process in the White House were “just a wet Band-Aid that wouldn’t hold together a gaping wound,” Anonymous writes. The members of the “Steady State” (the term “Deep State” clearly stings) have done everything they can, to no avail. Anonymous is passing the baton to “voters and their elected representatives” — only now the baton is a flaming stick of dynamite.
“A Warning,” then, is just that: a warning, for those who need it, that electing Mr. Trump to a second term would be courting disaster. “The president has failed to rise to the occasion in fulfilling his duties,” Anonymous intones.The book’s publisher and agents apparently referred to the manuscript as the “December Project,” though the publication date was moved up to this month when the House announced an impeachment inquiry.
“I realize that writing this while the president is still in office is an extraordinary step,”Anonymous says. In light of three years’ worth of resignations, tell-all books, reports about emoluments and sworn testimony about quid pro quos, this is a decidedly minimalist definition of “extraordinary.” How can a book that has been denuded of anything too specific do anything more than pale against a formal whistle-blower complaint?
It’s hard to look like a heroic truth teller by comparison, but Anonymous tries very hard, presenting anonymity as not just convenient but an ultimately selfless act, designed to force everyone to pay more attention to what this book says by deflecting attention away from the person who’s saying it. “Removing my identity from the equation deprives him of an opportunity to create a distraction,” Anonymous writes, referring to Mr. Trump’s compulsion for attacking his critics. “What will he do when there is no person to attack, only an idea?”
Anonymous has seen disturbing things. Anonymous has heard disturbing things. You, the reader, will already recognize most of what Anonymous has seen and heard as revealed in this book if you have been paying any attention to the news. Did you know that the president isn’t much of a reader? That he’s inordinately fond of autocrats? That “he stumbles, slurs, gets confused, is easily irritated, and has trouble synthesizing information”?
“A Warning,” Anonymous says, is intended for a “broad audience,” though to judge by the parade of bland, methodical arguments (Anonymous loves to qualify criticisms with a lawyerly “in fairness”), the ideal reader would seem to be an undecided voter who has lived in a cave for the past three years, and is irresistibly moved by quotations from Teddy Roosevelt and solemn invocations of Cicero.
Plenty of people have preemptively criticized this book as an opportunistic grift, though Anonymous has announced a plan to donate a portion of the royalties to “nonprofit organizations that focus on government accountability,” including the White House Correspondents’ Association. Besides, everything in the text of “A Warning” suggests a dyed-in-the-wool establishment Republican. There’s the typical talk about American exceptionalism and national security. There’s the eternal complaint that President Barack Obama was “out of touch with mainstream America.” There’s a wistful elegy for “our budget-balancing daydreams.” Yes, Anonymous is happy about the conservative judicial appointments, the deregulation, the tax cuts; what rankles is the “unbecoming” behavior, the “unseemly antics.”
A big tell comes early on, when Anonymous reveals what “the last straw” was. It wasn’t Mr. Trump’s response to the right-wing rally in Charlottesville, Va., in 2017, when a white supremacist killed a woman and the president talked about “the violence on many sides.” It wasn’t even the administration’s separation of migrant families at the border. These examples might have left Anonymous appalled, but the truly unforgivable act was when Senator John McCain died last year and Mr. Trump tried to hoist the flag on the White House above half-staff: “President Trump, in unprecedented fashion, was determined to use his office to limit the nation’s recognition of John McCain’s legacy.”
Anonymous says that the president “deserves to be fired,” but that’s just the author indulging in a little rhetorical flourish; what Anonymous really means is that the president’s contract shouldn’t be renewed. Actively seeking to remove Mr. Trump from office, whether by invoking the 25th Amendment or pursuing impeachment proceedings, would be “bad” because “we can scarcely afford further disunion.” Mr. Trump, Anonymous says, should simply not be elected to a second term; only then can the country “undertake the arduous task of moral repair” and “restore the soul of its political system.” 
Anonymous declares that this “American spirit” was best exemplified by the bravery shown by the passengers on United Flight 93, who rushed the cockpit on 9/11. We’ve seen Flight 93 used as a conservative analogy before — by another anonymous author no less, writing under the pen name Publius Decius Mus, who argued before the 2016 presidential election that “a Hillary Clinton presidency is Russian Roulette with a semi-auto” and consequently that voting for Mr. Trump offered the only chance for the republic’s survival.
That the same violent tragedy has been deployed to argue one point and then, three years later, to argue its utter opposite is, to put it charitably, bizarre. But then Anonymous, a self-described “student of history,” doesn’t seem to register the discrepancy. Nor does Anonymous square the analogy with an episode mentioned in the opening pages of “A Warning” — of senior officials contemplating a replay of the Nixon administration’s so-called Saturday Night Massacre by resigning en masse. The idea of doing anything so bold was floated within the first two years of the Trump administration, and then abandoned.
Toward the end of the book, an earlier quote from Mr. Trump kept coming back to me, unbidden: “These are just words. A bunch of words. It doesn’t mean anything.”

sábado, 31 de maio de 2014

Itamaraty: wikileaks do Anonymous deve criar embaracos na politica externa

Segurança

Invasão ao Itamaraty permitiu que hackers tivessem acesso a documentos da Copa

Palácio do Itamaraty, BrasíliaGrupo Anonymous divulgou mais de 300 documentos que teriam sido acessados na invasão ao sistema do Ministério de Relações Exteriores

Veja.com, 31/05/2014
Uma invasão do sistema de e-mails do Itamaraty resultou no vazamento de quase 300 documentos, entre eles relatórios e telegramas classificados pelo serviço diplomático como "secretos" e com potencial para incomodar o governo brasileiro. Mesmo sem terem acessado o sistema interno de arquivo do Ministério, os hackers conseguiram extrair de computadores do Itamaraty análises para negociações internacionais, textos de subsídios para reuniões bilaterais a serem usados pela presidente Dilma Rousseff e o próprio ministro das Relações Exteriores e até agendas com telefones de autoridades.
O Itamaraty não reconhece a veracidade dos documentos revelados pelo grupo Anonymous, que assumiu ser o autor do ataque aos servidores do Ministério. De acordo com o porta-voz, embaixador Antônio Tabajara, os documentos estão abertos e apresentados em formatos que podem ter sido editados ou alterados de alguma forma. Ainda assim, os textos têm, em sua maioria, o timbre do Itamaraty e o formato tradicional dos chamados telegramas, os textos de comunicação entre o ministério e os diversos postos diplomáticos no Brasil e no exterior.
Entre eles, está o relatório preparado para o então ministro das Relações Exteriores, Antonio Patriota, na visita do seu colega americano, o secretário de Estado John Kerry. Em meio à crise com os Estados Unidos pela descoberta do que a National Security Agency (NSA) havia espionado cidadãos e empresas brasileiras - inclusive a própria presidente Dilma - o documento trata apenas brevemente do assunto. Aconselha ao ministro que levante o tema, mas deixe claro que a crise não vai influenciar nas negociações entre os dois países. Recomenda que o pedido de "uma clara manifestação de apoio à candidatura do Brasil a membro permanente do Conselho de Segurança, pelo menos análoga à declaração de apoio à candidatura da Índia" - algo que o Brasil ainda não conseguiu e pede, ainda que os EUA retire Cuba da lista de países que patrocinam o terrorismo.
Também aparece um resumo das conversas entre autoridades brasileiras e o vice-presidente dos Estados Unidos, Joe Biden, durante uma visita ao Brasil em maio do ano passado e uma lista de ministros do Esporte que planejam vir ao país para a Copa do Mundo. Outros documentos que citavam questões de segurança durante a Copa também foram vazados, mas muitos não seguiam os padrões do Itamaraty.
Um hacker conhecido com AnonManifest usou um ataque com phishing para invadir a base de dados do Itamaraty e acessar o seu sistema de documentação, como noticiou a coluna Radar on-line. O ministério desativou o seu sistema de correio eletrônico depois do ataque e instruiu os usuários das suas três mil contas de e-mail a mudar suas senhas. A Polícia Federal está investigando a invasão.
De acordo com o Itamaraty, já foi feito o mapeamento do que teria sido vazado e não foi identificado nada altamente prejudicial aos interesses do governo. As investigações estão sendo feitas pelo Gabinete de Segurança Institucional e a Polícia Federal, mas o sistema do ministério já voltou ao ar desde a última quarta-feira.
Os hackers usaram o esquema chamado phishing, em que e-mails aparentemente de pessoas conhecidas são enviadas para colegas com inclusão de um link para um documento supostamente importante. Ao abrir o arquivo são instalados no sistema os chamados cavalos de troia, que recolhem informações sigilosas dos usuários, como senhas, e abre acesso para que os hackers possam retirar dali documentos arquivados.
Comércio — Estão na lista, também, todos os documentos para as reuniões do Mercosul de 2011, 2012 e 2013, relatando as posições brasileiras em diversos assuntos e a análise que a diplomacia brasileira faz dos vizinhos, algumas vezes em termos que não seriam usados nas negociações.
Há reclamações, como, por exemplo, dos demais membros não aceitarem reconhecer a cachaça como produto tipicamente brasileiro, ou análise de propostas consideradas irreais, a ponto de o diplomata responsável, dizer, por exemplo, que se os vizinhos - especialmente a Argentina - insistissem em algumas mudanças seria melhor desistir da implementação do código aduaneiro comum. Há, ainda, análises para negociações econômicas em curso e sigilosas, sumários para visitas de Estado - como a do vice-presidente Michel Temer à Rússia - e análises das posições brasileiras em questões como a guerra na Síria e a questão nuclear no Irã. Documentos claramente pessoais, como fotos de uma capa de revista e contratos de empregados domésticos mostram que os textos foram tirados dos HDs de computadores dos servidores do ministério, não apenas no Brasil, mas no exterior.
(com agência Reuters e Estadão Conteúdo)

Itamaraty wikileaks: bullshits e hipocrisias revelados pelos hackers

30/5/2014 às 22h24 (Atualizado em 30/5/2014 às 22h26)

Hackers vazam documentos secretos do Itamaraty sobre diplomacia e cachaça

Ataque ocorreu entre os dias 19 e 27 de maio. Hackers usaram o esquema phishing
Agência Estado
Sistema do Itamaraty foi invadido por hackersBBC/Reuters
invasão do sistema de e-mails do Itamaraty resultou no vazamento de quase 500 documentos, entre eles relatórios e telegramas classificados pelos serviço diplomático como "secretos" e com potencial para incomodar o governo brasileiro.
Mesmo sem terem acessado o sistema interno de arquivo do ministério, os hackers conseguiram extrair de computadores do Itamaraty análises para negociações internacionais, textos de subsídios para reuniões bilaterais a serem usados pela presidente Dilma Rousseff e o próprio ministro das Relações Exteriores e até agendas com telefones de autoridades.
O Itamaraty não reconhece a veracidade dos documentos revelados pelo grupo Anonymous, que assumiu ser o autor do ataque aos servidores do ministério.
De acordo com o porta-voz, embaixador Antônio Tabajara, os documentos estão abertos e apresentados em formatos que podem ter sido editados ou alterados de alguma forma.
Ainda assim, os textos têm, em sua maioria, o timbre do Itamaraty e o formato tradicional dos chamados telegramas, os textos de comunicação entre o ministério e os diversos postos diplomáticos no Brasil e no exterior.
Patriota e Kerry
Entre eles, está o relatório preparado para o então ministro das Relações Exteriores, Antonio Patriota, na visita do seu colega americano, o secretário de Estado John Kerry.
Em meio à crise com os Estados Unidos pela descoberta do que a NSA (National Security Agency) havia espionado cidadãos e empresas brasileiras - inclusive a própria presidente Dilma — o documento trata apenas brevemente do assunto. Aconselha ao ministro que levante o tema, mas deixe claro que a crise não irá influenciar nas negociações entre os dois países.
Recomenda que o pedido de "uma clara manifestação de apoio à candidatura do Brasil a membro permanente do Conselho de Segurança, pelo menos análoga à declaração de apoio à candidatura da Índia" — algo que o Brasil ainda não conseguiu e pede, ainda que os EUA retire Cuba da lista de países que patrocinam o terrorismo.
Cachaça
Estão na lista, também, todos os documentos para as reuniões do Mercosul de 2011, 2012 e 2013, relatando as posições brasileiras em diversos assuntos e a análise que a diplomacia brasileira faz dos vizinhos, algumas vezes em termos que não seriam usados nas negociações.
Há reclamações, como, por exemplo, dos demais membros não aceitarem reconhecer a cachaça como produto tipicamente brasileiro, ou análise de propostas consideradas irreais, a ponto de o diplomata responsável, dizer, por exemplo, que se os vizinhos — especialmente a Argentina — insistissem em algumas mudanças seria melhor desistir da implementação do código aduaneiro comum.
Rússia, Síria e Irã
Há, ainda, análises para negociações econômicas em curso e sigilosas, sumários para visitas de Estado — como a do vice-presidente Michel Temer à Rússia — e análises das posições brasileiras em questões como a guerra na Síria e a questão nuclear no Irã.
Documentos claramente pessoais, como fotos de uma capa de revista e contratos de empregados domésticos mostram que os textos foram tirados dos HDs de computadores dos servidores do ministério, não apenas no Brasil, mas no exterior.
Segurança Institucional
De acordo com o Itamaraty, já foi feito o mapeamento do que teria sido vazado e não foi identificado nada altamente prejudicial aos interesses do governo. As investigações estão sendo feitas pelo Gabinete de Segurança Institucional e a Polícia Federal, mas o sistema do ministério já voltou ao ar desde a última quarta-feira.
O ataque foi feito aos servidores do Itamaraty entre os dias 19 e 27 de maio. Os hackers usaram o esquema chamado phishing, em que e-mails aparentemente de pessoas conhecidas são enviadas para colegas com inclusão de um link para um documento supostamente importante.
Ao abrir o arquivo são instalados no sistema os chamados cavalos de troia, que recolhem informações sigilosas dos usuários, como senhas, e abre acesso para que os hackers possam retirar dali documentos arquivados.