De novo no NYT: protestos no Brasil

Não só no NYT: os eventos no Brasil, sobretudo a violência devem estar, hoje, em todas as primeiras páginas dos principais jornais do mundo.

Apenas um registro pessoal quanto ao destaque dado ao Movimento Passe Livre. Sou contra: acho a proposta debilóide e nociva, no plano das políticas públicas e da economia coletiva e privada. Estadistas não se dobrariam a essa loucura; medíocres o fazem. 

Paulo Roberto de Almeida

Sweeping Protests in Brazil Pull In an Array of Grievances

By SIMON ROMERO and WILLIAM NEUMAN

New York Times, june 21, 2013: 7:37 AM ET

SÃO PAULO, Brazil — Just a few weeks ago, Mayara Vivian felt pretty good when a few hundred people showed up for a protest she helped organize to deride the government over a proposed bus fare increase. She had been trying to prod Brazilians into the streets since 2005, when she was only 15, and by now she thought she knew what to expect.

But when tens of thousands of protesters thronged the streets this week, rattling cities across the country in a reckoning this nation had not experienced in decades, she was dumbfounded, at a loss to explain how it could have happened.

“One hundred thousand people, we never would have thought it,” said Ms. Vivian, one of the founders of the Free Fare Movement, which helped start the protests engulfing Brazil. “It’s like the taking of the Bastille.”

More than a million protesters marched in the streets late Thursday, according to Brazilian news reports, in the biggest demonstrations yet, and President Dilma Rousseff on Friday called an emergency meeting of her top Cabinet members.

The mass protests thundering across Brazil have swept up an impassioned array of grievances — costly stadiums, corrupt politicians, high taxes and shoddy schools — and spread to more than 100 cities on Thursday night, the most to date, with increasing ferocity.

All of a sudden, a country that was once viewed as a stellar example of a rising, democratic power finds itself upended by an amorphous, leaderless popular uprising with one unifying theme: an angry, and sometimes violent, rejection of politics as usual.

Much like the Occupy movement in the United States, the anticorruption protests that shook India in recent years, the demonstrations over living standards in Israel or the fury in European nations like Greece, the demonstrators in Brazil are fed up with traditional political structures, challenging the governing party and the opposition alike. And their demands are so diffuse that they have left Brazil’s leaders confounded as to how to satisfy them.

“The intensity on the streets is much larger than we imagined,” said Marcelo Hotimsky, a philosophy student who is another organizer of the Free Fare Movement. “It’s not something we control, or something we even want to control.”

Even after politicians in São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro and other parts of Brazil ceded to the protesters’ initial demands by rolling back bus fare increases this week, the demonstrations continued to spread on Thursday night, and President Rousseff delayed a trip to Japan amid the crisis. The increasing number of cities, the intensity — and in a growing selection of places, the violence — could represent a turning point in the protests.

In Brasília, the capital, the police used pepper spray and tear gas to block protesters from reaching Congress, but many marched on another Modernist landmark in the city, smashing windows at the Foreign Ministry, setting a fire in the entrance and scaling the Meteor, an iconic marble sculpture in a reflecting pool. Banners in the crowd carried slogans like “While you watch your nightly soap opera, we fight for you.”

“I saw the youth taking to the streets and I wanted to support them,” said Raimundo Machado, 50, a public servant in Brasília worried about the beleaguered public health system. “I pay for a health plan, but I can pay. What about those who can’t?”

In Ribeirão Preto, an 18-year-old protester was struck by a car and killed. Large turnouts shook other cities, with hundreds of thousands protesting in Rio de Janeiro, drinking beer and singing as they marched toward the city government.

But after the sun set, the police used tear gas to disperse them, causing hundreds to run on an already packed street, scrambling not to be pushed into a dirty canal and using bandannas to cover their faces. Dozens were reported injured.

“They don’t invest in education, they don’t invest in infrastructure, and they keep putting makeup on the city to show to the world that we can host the World Cup and Olympics,” said Jairo Domingos, 26, a technical support assistant in Rio, referring to the 2014 World Cup and 2016 Olympic Games. “We work four months of the year just to pay taxes and we get nothing in return.”

In Salvador, Brazil’s third-largest city, clashes broke out between protesters and the police, while in Belém, the capital of Pará State in the Amazon, demonstrators threw stones at the mayor. Here in São Paulo, thousands flowed into Avenida Paulista, the city’s most prominent thoroughfare, with some protesters burning the flags of political parties in a repudiation of the political system.

“Our taxes should not go to line the pockets of Neymar and Ronaldinho,” said Jean Moreira, 26, a business student, referring to the Brazilian soccer stars, as he gripped a sign that read, in English, “We won’t have World Cup because the giant woke up.”

The ire has extended to Brazil’s established news media, which some see as tied to the elite and focused on portraying the violent minority of demonstrators. Protesters in São Paulo have burned a vehicle belonging to a television network covering the events, while in another episode, a prominent television reporter for Globo, the country’s largest television network, was assaulted while covering a protest in the city center.

As an alternative, some protesters have begun covering the demonstrations themselves, distributing their reports though social media. One group, called N.I.N.J.A., a Portuguese acronym for Independent Journalism and Action Narratives, has been circulating through the streets with smartphones, cameras and a generator held in a supermarket cart — a makeshift, roving production studio.

And while some protesters have taken pains to distinguish themselves from the Occupy movements that have sprouted elsewhere, others have embraced the title. One group of protesters from Complexo do Alemão — a patchwork of slums in Rio once seen as an epicenter of crime and drug trafficking — belonged to an organization called Occupy Alemão, created to demonstrate against police abuses.

“We want a public security strategy that is made in dialogue with society,” said Raull Santiago, 24, a community organizer. “We have a high cost of living and precarious services. This is for basic rights. Look at how much is being spent on the Olympics.”

The array of frustrations and demands has made it difficult for Brazil’s leaders to respond. Specific concessions, as on the bus fares, were not broad enough to placate the demonstrators. But the kind of sweeping, public acknowledgment of the legitimacy of the protesters’ anger and ambitions — a tactic employed by the president earlier in the week — did not work, either.

“This is a remarkably diffuse movement; they don’t even use loudspeakers to get their message across with thousands of people on the street,” said Lincoln Secco, a history professor at the University of São Paulo who teaches several of the organizers in the Free Fare Movement.

Asked why the protests were emerging now, he said, “Why not now? This isn’t something happening just in Brazil, but a new form of protesting, which is not channeled through traditional institutions.”

Todd Gitlin, a professor of journalism and sociology at Columbia University who has studied social movements, including Occupy Wall Street and the Arab Spring, said it was hard to know exactly what sparks would set off a broader movement.

“It’s similar to the way in which a certain kind of music suddenly is everywhere, and there’s no theory that can tell you which it’s going to be and when,” he said.

But the activists at the heart of the movement — they refuse to call themselves leaders — insist that what is happening in Brazil did not burst out of nowhere.

“It has a spontaneous element that is important when people start going to protests,” said Rafael Siqueira, 38. But he added, “It came out of a lot of work.”

The Free Fare Movement was created in 2005, at a meeting in Pôrto Alegre, a southern city. Ms. Vivian, who is now 23, helped organize the event, which drew about 200 activists from around the country. Under a large tent at a campsite in a park, activists came up with a logo: a crude drawing of a stick figure kicking over a bus turnstile.

Ms. Vivian, now a waitress and geography student who was bleary-eyed from lack of sleep after days of continuous protests, laughed when she thought about her early days as an organizer. “In 2005 we were a bunch of kids who had never organized any kind of demonstration,” she said.

Without the organizing grunt work over the years, she and others said, the stage for the current wave of protests would not have been set. Still, Ms. Vivian and her fellow activists could not explain the change that had suddenly brought huge crowds into the streets all around the country.

“People finally woke up,” Ms. Vivian said. Asked why it happened now, she shrugged and said, “We really don’t know.”

Taylor Barnes contributed reporting from Rio de Janeiro, and Lucy Jordan from Brasília.