O que é este blog?

Este blog trata basicamente de ideias, se possível inteligentes, para pessoas inteligentes. Ele também se ocupa de ideias aplicadas à política, em especial à política econômica. Ele constitui uma tentativa de manter um pensamento crítico e independente sobre livros, sobre questões culturais em geral, focando numa discussão bem informada sobre temas de relações internacionais e de política externa do Brasil. Para meus livros e ensaios ver o website: www.pralmeida.org. Para a maior parte de meus textos, ver minha página na plataforma Academia.edu, link: https://itamaraty.academia.edu/PauloRobertodeAlmeida.

terça-feira, 13 de maio de 2014

Presidente do Banco Central Br, tipo exportacao... para presidir o Fed

Armínio Fraga foi cotado para comandar o Banco Central americano

Ex-presidente do BC brasileiro durante o governo de FHC foi citado pelo ex-secretário do Tesouro americano como 'confiável e competente'

Timothy Geithner, ex-secretário do Tesouro americano e atual presidente do Warburg Pincus (um fundo de compra de participações empresariais), sugeriu ao presidente Barack Obama o nome do brasileiro Armínio Fraga para presidir o Federal Reserve, o banco central americano. O cargo é ocupado desde fevereiro deste ano por Janet Yellen, a primeira mulher a assumir o posto.
Fraga, que presidiu o Banco Central brasileiro durante o governo de Fernando Henrique Cardoso e atua como conselheiro econômico do candidato tucano à presidência, Aécio Neves, é mencionado no livro de memórias de Geithner (lançado na última segunda-feira, 12, nos EUA) Stress Test – Reflexões sobre Crises Financeiras, como “confiável e competente”. Na publicação, o ex-secretário recorda a crise financeira global de 1998, que levou à desvalorização do real, após um período de paridade com o dólar.
“Após abandonar uma tentativa inicial de se manter a paridade do real com o dólar, uma brilhante liderança econômica no Brasil conseguiu dar a volta por cima em poucos meses”, relata. Timothy Geithner fez questão de citar a dupla cidadania de Armínio Fraga: “O então presidente de Banco Central brasileiro, Armínio Fraga, que também tem cidadania americana, foi tão notável que mais tarde eu o mencionei para o presidente Obama como um potencial presidente do Fed”.
O livro tem 580 páginas e analisa, logo no início, a crise dos anos 1990 no país, além de detalhar o efeito tequila no México, a crise russa e a do Sudeste Asiático. Porém, em sua maior parte, trata da crise de 2008 e do polêmico resgate aos bancos depois do colapso do Lehman Brothers. Na ocasião, Geithner era presidente da divisão do Fed em Nova York.

Greve de funcionarios locais do Servico Exterior brasileiro: sucesso de midia, so far...

A julgar pelas matérias aparecidas na imprensa, a greve dos funcionários locais do Serviço Exterior brasileiro, seguida com resultados diferenciados basicamente em alguns postos na Europa (onde a situação da legislação trabalhista é diferente, mas onde a defasagem salarial deve ser igual ou pior), e sobretudo em diversos postos diplomáticos nos Estados Unidos (onde as lacunas trabalhistas são mais nítidas), foi um sucesso de mídia, tendo recebido destaques em diversos veículos do Brasil e do exterior.
A seguir, links para algumas matérias capturadas ao sabor do vento...
Paulo Roberto de Almeida

Los Angeles, BDCI Channel:

Globo News: 

Radio France Internationale

BBC, UK:

Bélgica:
Nova York:

Montreal:

Veja.com:

Jornal O Globo:

Revista Exame:

Holanda:

Senado Federal, Brasília:

Finalmente, cenas explícitas de apedrejamento, mas ainda não de lapidação: 

========
Outras notícias sobre a greve: 











Mercosul sem uniao aduaneira, sem livre comercio, sem comercio, sem nada; so conversa... -Editorial Estadao

Brasília em ritmo argentino

12 de maio de 2014 | 2h 06
Editorial O Estado de S.Paulo
O governo brasileiro, mais uma vez, se curva às imposições argentinas e com isso fica de novo adiado o livre comércio de veículos e autopeças entre os dois países. O protecionismo, os entraves e a burocracia comercial continuam prevalecendo entre as duas maiores economias do Mercosul, um bloco malsucedido e impropriamente classificado como união aduaneira. O adiamento do livre comércio de produtos automotivos será por mais um ano, segundo a previsão oficial. Na prática, poderá ser por muito mais tempo, se Brasília continuar, como na última década, obediente aos comandos da Casa Rosada. Apesar de mais essa rendição, o ministro do Desenvolvimento, Indústria e Comércio Exterior, Mauro Borges, ainda exibiu otimismo ao anunciar, no Congresso Nacional, mais uma prorrogação do acordo automotivo e o fechamento - próximo, segundo ele - da lista de ofertas do Mercosul à União Europeia. A troca de ofertas é um passo necessário à conclusão de um acordo comercial entre os blocos.
O acordo automotivo entre Brasil e Argentina foi assinado em 2000, entrou em vigor no ano seguinte e seria substituído em 2005 por um regime de livre comércio. Não deu certo. O acordo foi prorrogado por mais um ano e a partir daí a liberalização foi sendo regularmente adiada. O último adiamento ocorreu no ano passado e o novo prazo deveria terminar em junho deste ano. Segundo o ministro, a mudança ficará para junho de 2015. Até lá, explicou, os dois lados poderão acertar de forma definitiva a liberalização do comércio automotivo. Poderão, é claro, se os governos estiverem interessados. Não há, hoje, razão para acreditar nessa mudança.
As regras têm variado segundo os interesses argentinos. Na última versão, a indústria brasileira poderia exportar sem impostos produtos no valor de até US$ 1,95 para cada dólar vendido pelos argentinos. Os dois lados concordam com a manutenção do sistema até o próximo ano, mas o governo argentino defende a redução do índice "flex" para 1,30. O governo brasileiro discorda, disse o ministro. "Mas temos condições de chegar a um acordo sobre isso", acrescentou, exibindo uma boa vontade nada surpreendente.
Também segundo o ministro, a preparação da lista de ofertas para a negociação com os europeus vai bem e deverá ser concluída numa reunião do Mercosul na terça-feira. Seria incorreto, disse ele, apontar a Argentina como um "óbice". Ele transmitiu esse recado outras vezes e a única novidade, no pronunciamento de quinta-feira, foi a palavra "óbice". O acerto com os argentinos foi adiado várias vezes. Talvez a previsão se confirme, mas é bom esperar para conferir.
E depois? O Mercosul, disse o ministro, só aceitará um acordo com a União Europeia se obtiver claras vantagens para suas exportações agropecuárias. A presidente Dilma Rousseff, segundo ele, tem pedido informações sobre os benefícios oferecidos pelos europeus. Brasileiros e argentinos têm insistido, ao longo das negociações com os europeus, na obtenção de facilidades de acesso para os produtos do agronegócio. O protecionismo agrícola na Europa é de fato um problema importante, mas é preciso pensar também nos interesses da indústria. Exportadores industriais de outros países têm condições mais favoráveis de acesso ao mercado da União Europeia.
O ministro reafirmou a disposição de trabalhar pela conversão da América do Sul em zona de livre comércio. Ele havia mencionado esse ponto recentemente. Mas, para isso, o governo brasileiro terá de aceitar uma abertura econômica maior. Essa condição foi citada em janeiro pelo presidente mexicano, Enrique Peña Nieto, quando lhe perguntaram, em Davos, se haveria interesse em um acordo entre a Aliança do Pacífico (Chile, Peru, Colômbia e México) e o Mercosul. No mesmo dia, também em Davos, a presidente Dilma Rousseff deixou claro seu pouco interesse em tornar mais aberto o mercado brasileiro. Nesse ponto, Brasília está muito mais próxima de Buenos Aires do que de Santiago, Lima, Bogotá e Cidade do México.

Livre: Le Brésil, pays émergé, par Hervé Théry, éditions Armand Colin, avril 2014


Hervé Théry, éditions Armand Colin, avril 2014

ENTRE FANTASMES EXOTIQUES ET RÉALITÉS, le Brésil a toujours suscité un vif intérêt voire une irrésistible attraction, qui s’est accrue ces dernières années : intérêt structurel dans tous les pays développés, notamment en France, en raison de la forte croissance économique de ce géant latino-américain (8,5 millions de km2 pour plus de 196 millions d’habitants) ; intérêt conjoncturel pour un pays qui s’est vu attribuer coup sur coup l’organisation de la Coupe du Monde (en 2014) et des Jeux olympiques (en 2016) ; intérêt politique lié à l’espoir incarné par le charismatique « Lula », et par celle dont il a voulu qu’il lui succède, Dilma Rousseff…

En revenant sur les raisons de la montée en puissance du Brésil, aussi bien sur le plan interne (ressources naturelles et agricoles, population jeune et qualifiée, institutions solides, etc.) qu’externe (jeu géopolitique sur le continent sud-américain, avec les autres pays BRICS, sur la scène internationale), cet ouvrage abondamment documenté, et rédigé par un observateur attentif de la culture brésilienne, dresse le portrait original d’un pays désormais « émergé ».

Hervé Théry est directeur de recherches au CNRS-Creda, professeur invité à l’université de São Paulo et codirecteur de la revue Confins.

Contact : 

 Hervé Théry : hthery@aol.com

Again: Greenwald on Snowden and the NSA - book review, Charlie Savage


Book Reveals Wider Net of U.S. Spying on Envoys


WASHINGTON — In May 2010, when the United Nations Security Council was weighing sanctions against Iran over itsnuclear program, several members were undecided about how they would vote. The American ambassador to the United Nations, Susan E. Rice, asked theNational Security Agency for help “so that she could develop a strategy,” a leaked agency document shows.
The N.S.A. swiftly went to work, developing the paperwork to obtain legal approval for spying on diplomats from four Security Council members — Bosnia, Gabon, Nigeria and Uganda — whose embassies and missions were not already under surveillance. The following month, 12 members of the 15-seat Security Council voted to approve new sanctions, with Lebanon abstaining and only Brazil and Turkey voting against.
Later that summer, Ms. Rice thanked the agency, saying its intelligence had helped her to know when diplomats from the other permanent representatives — China, England, France and Russia — “were telling the truth ... revealed their real position on sanctions ... gave us an upper hand in negotiations ... and provided information on various countries ‘red lines.’ ”
The two documents laying out that episode, both leaked by the former N.S.A. contractor Edward J. Snowden, are reproduced in a new book by Glenn Greenwald, “No Place to Hide: Edward Snowden, the N.S.A., and the U.S. Surveillance State.” The book is being published Tuesday.
Elements of the N.S.A.’s role in helping aid American diplomatic negotiations leading up to the Iran sanctions vote had been previously reported, including in an October 2013 article in the French newspaper Le Monde that focused on the agency’s spying on French diplomats.
Mr. Greenwald’s book also reproduces a document listing embassies and missions that had been penetrated by the N.S.A., including those of Brazil, Bulgaria, Colombia, the European Union, France, Georgia, Greece, India, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Slovakia, South Africa, South Korea, Taiwan, Venezuela and Vietnam. Aspects of that document were reported in June by The Guardian.
Revelations about N.S.A. spying abroad, including on officials of American allies, has fueled anger at the United States. But Caitlin Hayden, an N.S.A. spokeswoman, noted that President Obama sought to address those issues in January when he promised greater limits on spying aimed at allies and partners.
“While our intelligence agencies will continue to gather information about the intentions of governments — as opposed to ordinary citizens — around the world, in the same way that the intelligence services of every other nation do, we will not apologize because our services may be more effective,” she said.
Ms. Rice’s request for help in May 2010 was recounted in an internal report by the security agency’s Special Source Operations division, which works with telecommunications companies on the American network.
A legal team was called in on May 22 to begin drawing up the paperwork for the four court orders, one for each of the four countries on the Security Council whose embassies and missions were apparently not yet under surveillance. A judge signed them on May 26.
The internal report showing that the N.S.A. obtains country-specific orders from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to eavesdrop on their diplomatic facilities may shed light on a murky document published in March by Der Spiegel. It showed that the court had issued an order authorizing spying on “Germany” on March 7, 2013, and listed several other countries whose orders were about to expire.
The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act does not authorize the court to issue orders for broad monitoring of specific countries. It does authorize orders of specific “foreign powers” operating on American soil, which expire after a year.

No Place to Hide: Greenwald book on Snowden and the NSA - Michiko Kakutani



Books


BOOKS OF THE TIMES

Snowden’s Story, Behind the Scenes

The title of the journalist Glenn Greenwald’s impassioned new book, “No Place to Hide,” comes from a chilling observation made in 1975 by Senator Frank Church, then chairman of a select committee on intelligence. The United States government, he said, had perfected “a technological capability that enables us to monitor the messages that go through the air.” That capability, he added, could at any time “be turned around on the American people, and no American would have any privacy left, such is the capability to monitor everything: telephone conversations, telegrams, it doesn’t matter. There would be no place to hide.”
That was nearly 40 years ago, and as the documents leaked last year by the former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden revealed, the N.S.A.’s ability to spy on our daily lives has grown exponentially to Orwellian proportions. The documents provided by Mr. Snowden revealed that the agency has an ability to monitor or collect information fromhundreds of millions of people around the globe, that it has broken into the communications links of major data centers across the world, that it has circumvented or cracked much of the encryption that protects sensitive data on the Internet, and that, according to its own records, it has broken privacy laws or exceeded its authority thousands of times a year. The first journalist Mr. Snowden approached by email was Glenn Greenwald, a columnist for The Guardian and former constitutional lawyer who had frequently written about civil liberties, the dangers of enhanced executive power, and surveillance abuses in post-Sept. 11 America. (Mr. Greenwald has since left The Guardian to work with Pierre Omidyar, the founder of eBay, on building a new media venture, which includes the news site The Intercept, of which Mr. Greenwald, Laura Poitras and Jeremy Scahill are founding editors.)
In “No Place to Hide,” Mr. Greenwald recounts the story of how he and Ms. Poitras, a documentary filmmaker, traveled to Hong Kong to meet with Mr. Snowden and the race to publish articles based on the documents he provided, all the while fearful of authorities’ closing in. The outlines of this story will be familiar to readers who followed it in real time last year, and to readers of the recent book “The Snowden Files” (by the Guardian reporter Luke Harding), just as much of the material here about the N.S.A. will be familiar to readers of articles that have appeared in The Guardian (many with Mr. Greenwald’s byline), The Washington Post and The New York Times.
“No Place to Hide” is enlivened by reproductions of dozens of fascinating documents from the Snowden archive that help illustrate the N.S.A.’s methodology and that showcase its strange corporatelike boosterism (complete with sometimes corny graphics). And Mr. Greenwald fleshes out his portrait of Mr. Snowden with fresh observations from their exchanges. He amplifies our understanding of the N.S.A.’s sweeping ambitions, methods and global reach, and provides detailed insights into what he calls the agency’s “corporate partnerships,” which “extend beyond intelligence and defense contractors to include the world’s largest and most important Internet corporations and telecoms.”
For instance, the agency’s Stormbrew program, Mr. Greenwald writes, “gives the N.S.A. access to Internet and telephone traffic that enters the United States at various ‘choke points’ on U.S. soil. It exploits the fact that the vast majority of the world’s Internet traffic at some point flows through the U.S. communications infrastructure — a residual by-product of the central role that the United States had played in developing the network.” According to the N.S.A., he says, Stormbrew “is currently comprised of very sensitive relationships with two U.S. telecom providers (cover terms ARTIFICE and WOLFPOINT)”; the identity of such corporate partners, he adds, “is one of the most closely guarded secrets in the N.S.A.”
Mr. Greenwald portrays Mr. Snowden — regarded by some as a heroic whistle-blower, by others as a traitor — as a courageous idealist who felt he needed to act on his beliefs. That outlook, Mr. Greenwald suggests, was partly shaped by books Mr. Snowden read growing up — Greek mythology and “The Hero With a Thousand Faces” by Joseph Campbell, which convinced Mr. Snowden that, in his own words, “it is we who infuse life with meaning through our actions and the stories we create with them.”
Mr. Snowden also confided “with a hint of embarrassment,” Mr. Greenwald writes, that video games had taught him certain lessons. As Mr. Snowden put it: “The protagonist is often an ordinary person, who finds himself faced with grave injustices from powerful forces and has the choice to flee in fear or to fight for his beliefs. And history also shows that seemingly ordinary people who are sufficiently resolute about justice can triumph over the most formidable adversaries.”
In the course of this book, Mr. Greenwald describes how he received his first communication from Mr. Snowden on Dec. 1, 2012, though he had no idea who it was from. The email came from someone calling himself Cincinnatus and urged Mr. Greenwald to begin using PGP encryption so that Cincinnatus could communicate with him securely. Busy with other projects, Mr. Greenwald procrastinated about installing the encryption program, and Mr. Snowden was only able to make contact with him months later, through Ms. Poitras.
According to Mr. Greenwald, Mr. Snowden would later describe his frustration: “Here am I ready to risk my liberty, perhaps even my life, to hand this guy thousands of Top Secret documents from the nation’s most secretive agency — a leak that will produce dozens if not hundreds of huge journalistic scoops. And he can’t even be bothered to install an encryption program.”
The most gripping sections of “No Place to Hide” recount Mr. Greenwald and Ms. Poitras’s 10-day trip to Hong Kong, where they and The Guardian’s veteran correspondent Ewen MacAskill met with Mr. Snowden in his hotel room. Mr. Greenwald describes the tradecraft they employed (removing batteries from their cellphones, or placing the phones in the minibar refrigerator) to avoid detection; his initial five-hour, litigatorlike grilling of Mr. Snowden; and the “giddy gallows humor” that later crept into their conversations (“I call the bottom bunk at Gitmo,” Mr. Snowden reportedly joked).
Mr. Greenwald writes that Mr. Snowden said one turning point in his decision to become a leaker came in 2010, when he was working as an N.S.A. contractor in Japan. “The stuff I saw really began to disturb me,” Mr. Snowden recalled. “I could watch drones in real time as they surveilled the people they might kill.” He added: “I watched N.S.A. tracking people’s Internet activities as they typed. I became aware of just how invasive U.S. surveillance capabilities had become. I realized the true breadth of this system. And almost nobody knew it was happening”
Substantial sections of this book deal not with Mr. Greenwald’s relationship with Mr. Snowden and the N.S.A., but with his combative view of “the establishment media,” which he has denounced for “glaring subservience to political power” and to which he condescends as inferior to his more activist kind of journalism.
In “No Place to Hide,” Mr. Greenwald is critical of the process by which publications like The Washington Post, The New York Times and The Guardian speak with government officials before publishing sensitive articles dealing with national security issues; he contends that this process allows the “government to control disclosures and minimize, even neuter, their impact.” He also makes self-dramatizing boasts about his own mission: “Only audacious journalism could give the story the power it needed to overcome the climate of fear the government had imposed on journalists and their sources.”
In one passage, Mr. Greenwald makes the demonstrably false assertion that one “unwritten rule designed to protect the government is that media outlets publish only a few such secret documents, and then stop,” that “they would report on an archive like Snowden’s so as to limit its impact — publish a handful of stories, revel in the accolades of a ‘big scoop,’ collect prizes, and then walk away, ensuring that nothing had really changed.” Many establishment media outlets obviously continue to pursue the Snowden story. Further, many of Mr. Greenwald’s gross generalizations about the establishment media do a terrible disservice to the many tenacious investigative reporters who have broken important stories on some of the very subjects like the war on terror and executive power that Mr. Greenwald feels so strongly about.
When Mr. Greenwald turns his fervor to the issue of surveillance and its implications for ordinary citizens’ civil liberties, he is far more credible. Sometimes eloquent. He places the N.S.A.’s current activities in historical perspective with the F.B.I.’s Cointelpro program to target political groups and individuals, begun in 1956 and ended in 1971. And he delivers a fierce argument in defense of the right of privacy, quoting the Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis’s famous dissent in the 1928 case Olmstead v. United States, of the founding fathers’ efforts “to protect Americans in their beliefs, their thoughts, their emotions and their sensations.”
The makers of our Constitution, Brandeis argued, conferred “the right to be let alone.”

DCSIMG

No Place to Hide: a book by Gleen Greenwald on Edward Snowden and the NSA surveillance

Book Reveals Wider Net of U.S. Spying on Envoys


WASHINGTON — In May 2010, when the United Nations Security Council was weighing sanctions against Iran over its nuclear program, several members were undecided about how they would vote. The American ambassador to the United Nations, Susan E. Rice, asked the National Security Agency for help “so that she could develop a strategy,” a leaked agency document shows.
The N.S.A. swiftly went to work, developing the paperwork to obtain legal approval for spying on diplomats from four Security Council members — Bosnia, Gabon, Nigeria and Uganda — whose embassies and missions were not already under surveillance. The following month, 12 members of the 15-seat Security Council voted to approve new sanctions, with Lebanon abstaining and only Brazil and Turkey voting against.
Later that summer, Ms. Rice thanked the agency, saying its intelligence had helped her to know when diplomats from the other permanent representatives — China, England, France and Russia — “were telling the truth ... revealed their real position on sanctions ... gave us an upper hand in negotiations ... and provided information on various countries ‘red lines.’ ”
The two documents laying out that episode, both leaked by the former N.S.A. contractor Edward J. Snowden, are reproduced in a new book by Glenn Greenwald, “No Place to Hide: Edward Snowden, the N.S.A., and the U.S. Surveillance State.” The book is being published Tuesday.
Elements of the N.S.A.’s role in helping aid American diplomatic negotiations leading up to the Iran sanctions vote had been previously reported, including in an October 2013 article in the French newspaper Le Monde that focused on the agency’s spying on French diplomats.
Mr. Greenwald’s book also reproduces a document listing embassies and missions that had been penetrated by the N.S.A., including those of Brazil, Bulgaria, Colombia, the European Union, France, Georgia, Greece, India, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Slovakia, South Africa, South Korea, Taiwan, Venezuela and Vietnam. Aspects of that document werereported in June by The Guardian.
Revelations about N.S.A. spying abroad, including on officials of American allies, has fueled anger at the United States. But Caitlin Hayden, an N.S.A. spokeswoman, noted that President Obama sought to address those issues in January when he promised greater limits on spying aimed at allies and partners.
“While our intelligence agencies will continue to gather information about the intentions of governments — as opposed to ordinary citizens — around the world, in the same way that the intelligence services of every other nation do, we will not apologize because our services may be more effective,” she said.
Ms. Rice’s request for help in May 2010 was recounted in an internal report by the security agency’s Special Source Operations division, which works with telecommunications companies on the American network.
A legal team was called in on May 22 to begin drawing up the paperwork for the four court orders, one for each of the four countries on the Security Council whose embassies and missions were apparently not yet under surveillance. A judge signed them on May 26.
The internal report showing that the N.S.A. obtains country-specific orders from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to eavesdrop on their diplomatic facilities may shed light on a murky document published in March by Der Spiegel. It showed that the court had issued an order authorizing spying on Germany on March 7, 2013, and listed several other countries whose orders were about to expire.
The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act does not authorize the court to issue orders for broad monitoring of specific countries. It does authorize orders of specific “foreign powers” operating on American soil, which expire after a year.

Delmiro Gouveia: um empresario nordestino progressista - Davi Bandeira, Sergio Alves, Eliseu Diógenes

O livro "Delmiro Gouveia entre o mito e a realidade: seus empreendimentos e sua contextualidade no tempo e no espaço" reúne textos dos pesquisadores Sérgio Alves (UFPE), Eliseu Diógenes (UFAL) e Davi Bandeira (Abras/UFF), com prefácio de Jacques Marcovitch (USP), que além de abordar a trajetória do empreendedor Delmiro Gouveia, desvenda o sentido e a presença do mito traçando um paralelo com a singular capacidade realizadora desse emblemático industrial, compreendendo os aspectos gerenciais, organizacionais e a incipiente industrialização no Nordeste.

Na obra, o leitor encontra múltiplos enfoques da antropologia, sociologia, administração, história e economia que propiciam uma melhor compreensão do “mito empreendedor”. Ainda integram o livro diversas imagens históricas.

A partir de JUNHO disponível na:
Edufal – www.edufal.com.br

Livraria Cultura – www.livrariacultura.com.br