Latin American Research Review
este aqui:
Volume 48, Number 2 (2013)
- Table of Contents
- Bolsa Família and the Shift in Lula’s Electoral Base, 2002–2006: A Reply to Bohn
by Cesar Zucco and Timothy J. Power - The Electoral Behavior of the Poor in Brazil: A Research Agenda
by Simone Bohn - The Microfoundations of Political Clientelism: Lessons from the Argentine Case
by Mariela Szwarcberg - Desconfi anza y accountability ¿Las causas del populismo en América Latina?
by José Del Tronco - Trade Liberalization, Deindustrialization, and Inequality: Evidence from Middle-Income Latin American Countries
by Juan Ariel Bogliaccini - Anti-Americanism in Latin America: Economic Exchange, Foreign Policy Legacies, and Mass Attitudes toward the Colossus of the North
by Andy Baker and David Cupery - Barbarism in the Muck of the Present: Dystopia and the Postapocalyptic from Pinedo to Sarmiento
by Zac Zimmer - Can Latin American Production Regimes Complement Universalistic Welfare Regimes? Implications from the Costa Rican Case
by Juliana Martínez Franzoni and Diego Sánchez-Ancochea
Review Essays
- Writing Political Violence into History
by Kirsten Weld - The Mexican Revolution at Its Centennial
by Jürgen Buchenau - Economic History and the Politics of Culture in Twentieth-Century Argentina
by Joel Horowitz - Coming of Age? Recent Scholarship on Brazilian Foreign Policy
by Jean Daudelin - Indigenous Appropriations and Boundary Crossings: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Indigenous Cultures and Politics in the Andes
by Carmen Martínez Novo
Nele, como vocês podem ver, tem um artigo de Jean Daudelin:
- Coming of Age? Recent Scholarship on Brazilian Foreign Policy
by Jean Daudelin
Bem, como eu sou um sujeito que escreve umas tantas coisas sobre esses temas, sou citado da seguinte forma:
"This generally positive assessment of Lula’s policy is challenged in a whole section devoted to “critical interpretations” (1:199–283). Paulo Roberto de Almeida—Itamaraty’s foremost “detached intellectual”7—proposes a sharp, if slightly sloppy, assessment of Lula’s diplomacy, arguing in particular that the latter’s efforts have failed to build a tighter South American community around Mercosul; to expand alliances in the global South; or to leverage the whole to gain influence and status, particularly at the United Nations (1:249–259)."