O que é este blog?

Este blog trata basicamente de ideias, se possível inteligentes, para pessoas inteligentes. Ele também se ocupa de ideias aplicadas à política, em especial à política econômica. Ele constitui uma tentativa de manter um pensamento crítico e independente sobre livros, sobre questões culturais em geral, focando numa discussão bem informada sobre temas de relações internacionais e de política externa do Brasil. Para meus livros e ensaios ver o website: www.pralmeida.org. Para a maior parte de meus textos, ver minha página na plataforma Academia.edu, link: https://itamaraty.academia.edu/PauloRobertodeAlmeida;

Meu Twitter: https://twitter.com/PauloAlmeida53

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/paulobooks

Mostrando postagens com marcador UN sanctions. Mostrar todas as postagens
Mostrando postagens com marcador UN sanctions. Mostrar todas as postagens

sábado, 1 de setembro de 2012

Nossos aliados no Brics: sobre Siria e Assange-Equador

O ministro Lavrov sempre foi, é um dos melhores amigos dos amigos dos amigos, se é que vocês me entendem, todos companheiros unidos numa mesma causa, em prol da soberania, do respeito à lei, da não intervenção nos assuntos internos dos outros Estados e essas outras coisas antigas, mas ainda válidas. Sua fala, abaixo transcrita, é de um realismo impressionante, o que só testemunha em favor de sua coerência lúcida e de sua adequação aos princípios consagrados do direito internacional, sem falar da lógica e do interesse próprio.
Como é que o regime sírio vai deixar de massacrar seus opositores, se estes pretendem massacrar o regime sírio, a começar por Assad e seus asseclas? Seria pedir que eles cometessem suicídio certo?
Por isso que Brasil e Rússia estão certos, desse ponto de vista: enquanto todas as partes não cessarem suas hostilidades, é irrealista pedir que apenas uma das partes renuncie à violência. Lógico, pois não?
Portanto, Assad está plenamente certo em continuar a destruir tranquilamente seu país, bombardeando bairros e cidades inteiras, lançando ataques aéreos contra seus opositores, enfim, massacrando alegremente aqueles que não concordam em que ele seja o único presidente legítimo da Síria. Quem não concorda com isso, não pode dialogar com o governo, certo?
O problema desses ocidentais é que eles não respeitam os direitos legítimos dos Estados soberanos, e ficam perturbando o cenários com demandas ilegítimas e ilegais relativas a democracia, direitos humanos e essas coisas incômodas. O Brasil está certo em defender a soberania dos Estados, e impedir a derrubada de governos legítimos pela força. O governo está certo ao se alinhar com a Rússia e a China no veto a essas medidas propostas no CSNU pelos ocidentais de intervenção nos assuntos internos da Síria. Onde iríamos parar, se isso fosse autorizado?
Quanto ao Equador, acho que o ministro Lavrov está ligeiramente equivocado: o que os bolcheviques fizeram foi justamente invadir o Palácio de Inverno, contra a lei e o direito. O ministro Lavrov está condenando agora os bolcheviques? Que gracinha...
Paulo Roberto de Almeida 


UN Security Council has no authority to support revolution in Syria – Lavrov

Published: 01 September, 2012, 10:51
Edited: 01 September, 2012, 17:03
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov (RIA Novosti/Eduard Pesov)
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov (RIA Novosti/Eduard Pesov)
The UN Security Council has no right to support a revolution or foreign intervention in Syria, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov warned. Any plan to withdraw government troops while fighting continues is untenable, and naïve at best, he added.
The demand for President Bashar al-Assad to resign as a precondition to resolving the Syrian crisis is a completely unrealistic approach, Lavrov said during a public appearance at the Moscow State University of Foreign Affairs.
“There are different attitudes towards the Syrian regime. But while fighting in the streets continues, it is absolutely unrealistic to say that the only way out is for one side to unilaterally capitulate. It is not a matter of ideology, we don’t support any political figures in Syria. We just reason from what is realistic,” Lavrov said to the students of the diplomatic university.
Harking back to the summit in Geneva in June, Lavrov noted that despite differing opinions on the conflict, all the participating countries agreed to work for a “free, stable, independent and democratic”Syria. However, “our western partners and some nations in the region are almost openly pushing for outside intervention,” said Lavrov.
“Outside intervention should be positive. Every international player should push for both sides of the Syrian conflict to cease violence,” stressed Lavrov. “Saying that the government should be the first to pull out its troops from towns and then the opposition is not a viable plan.”
The Russian foreign minister added that those foreign players who insist on inciting the opposition forces “are not working in the interests of the Syrian people. They are motivated by their own geopolitical interests.”
Lavrov cited the fact the Security Council dismissed a vote on the Geneva accord as evidence that a number of countries were not working for the Syrian people.

Ecuador, Assange’s rights must be respected

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange’s rights as a political refugee must be respected, Lavrov said, adding that under international law, it would be illegal for UK police to storm the Ecuadorian embassy.
“As long as he is inside Ecuadorian territory, I think no one will try any rash actions, and the rights of the refugee [Assange] must be respected. No one can challenge the judicial process. But when the Ecuadorian embassy is threatened with being stormed, just like the Winter Palace was, I think it’s a little outside the rule of law,” Lavrov said in his talk to the students, alluding to the Bolshevik storming of the Winter Palace during Russia's 1917 revolution.
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has been holed up inside the Ecuadorian embassy in London since June. The whistleblower is currently in the center of an international stalemate insofar as Ecuador has granted him asylum but the UK has pledged to arrest him if he sets foot outside the building. 
Assange estimates that he could potentially get out of the Ecuadorian embassy in a year’s time if Sweden drops the extradition order against him. The 41-year-old Australian is wanted for questioning over charges of sexual assault and rape in Sweden.
Assange has said that if Sweden drops the extradition order against him he could potentially leave the embassy in a year’s time. The 41-year-old Australian is wanted for questioning over charges of sexual assault and rape in Sweden.
Commenting on the WikLeaks whistleblowing scandal that precipitated Assange’s asylum request, Lavrov said that the information in the WikiLeaks cables “brought to light how governments relate to their partners, and what they think of them.” The document dump hadn’t harmed or threatened the safety of any particular government, he said.
“It was curious,” Lavrov said. “But nothing more. Many of our impressions were simply confirmed.”

quarta-feira, 20 de junho de 2012

Iran: uma nova Coreia do Norte? - Wall Street Journal

Com as sanções se aproximando, o Irã pode tornar-se um novo país recluso, introvertido, fechado no seu sistema rígido, tendo como únicas portas para o mundo a China e a Rússia.
A ver...
Sanctions for Iran as Talks Fail

The Wall Street Journal, June 19, 2012


MOSCOW—Sanctions aimed at punishing Iran will begin in two weeks after another round of talks with world powers ended without an agreement by Tehran to curb its nuclear program.
The lead negotiators for both sides said the ball was in the other's court after the end of talks here. Catherine Ashton, the European Union's foreign policy chief, and Saeed Jalili, the lead Iranian negotiator, used similar words, saying that the other had "a choice" to make to get negotiations restarted.
Iran had hoped the talks might forestall the looming sanctions. With new penalties now a certainty, the long-running international dispute has entered an unpredictable new phase that will test past Iranian threats to retaliate, including a vow to choke off a key global oil channel, the Strait of Hormuz.
In the absence of talks, sanctions also may be the last barrier to a possible Israeli strike on Iran's nuclear facilities, a step U.S. officials fear could spark a wider conflict.
Associated Press
Iran's Jalili, center, said the talks were 'a test on whether the West is for or against Iran's scientific progress.'
Iran's economy already is suffering shocks because of a combination of government mismanagement and sanctions that have driven up the cost of staple goods by as much as 50%.
Upcoming penalties will up the ante by targeting Iranian oil exports, its main source of revenue. A European Union embargo on all Iranian oil sales takes effect July 1, a move that could endanger as much as a third of Iran's revenue.
Before that, the White House will impose sanctions on firms doing business with Iran's central bank beginning June 28, another tool to drain Tehran of its oil revenue.
The U.S. Congress is likewise poised to push for more sanctions after the failure of talks in the past two months in Istanbul, Baghdad and now Moscow.
U.S. officials underscored their determination to enforce sanctions with a warning to Venezuela on Tuesday over a plan to cooperate with Iran to develop surveillance drones.
"All countries, including Venezuela, have an obligation to comply with international sanctions against Iran," said State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland. "We're committed to ensuring that if we see violations of Iran sanctions, that we will call them out and that we will seek appropriate action."
Iran and the world powers agreed to extend the negotiations by planning some lower-level technical meetings on July 3 in Istanbul.
No higher-level meetings are yet scheduled.
Compounding the setback, Iran recently backed out of a tentative deal with the United Nations' nuclear watchdog to provide its inspectors with greater access to scientists, sites and documents believed to be tied to Tehran's nuclear work.
Underscoring the rising stakes, the U.S. House Armed Services Committee will hold a hearing Wednesday on military options for addressing Iran's nuclear program.
Under the new U.S. sanctions, any foreign state bank processing oil transactions through Iran's central bank, called Bank Markazi, could be punished. Non-state institutions doing business with Bank Markazi could also be hit.
The State Department has granted waivers in recent months from these sanctions to countries that have shown a willingness to reduce their Iran oil purchases.
But China and Singapore could still be targeted after June 28, U.S. officials said.
Additional U.S. sanctions could further target Iranian energy and financial sectors as well as its shipping and insurance businesses, said Sen. Mark Kirk (R., Ill.), who has advanced new sanctions legislation.
"After three rounds of meetings, Iran remains in violation of multiple U.N. Security Council resolutions ordering it to halt all its uranium enrichment activities," Mr. Kirk said.
Diplomats called the two days of talks in Moscow "intense and tough" but said that the two sides remained far apart on how to unwind Iran's uranium enrichment program, which Tehran again Tuesday called an "inalienable right" of the Iranian people.
Western officials had expressed hope that the talks Monday and Tuesday would bear fruit, in part because heightened pressure from the Kremlin, which has traditionally maintained a closer relationship with Iran than most of the other Security Council members that are pressuring Tehran to scale back its nuclear program.
Russian officials dined with the Iranian delegation, and met with members in an effort to push along negotiations.
But U.S. and European officials said the talks remained deadlocked over Iran's program.
As in previous talks in Baghdad last month and in Istanbul before that, Iran demanded a lifting of sanctions before it would back off on its enrichment of uranium to 20% purity, which Western officials call perilously close to weapons grade.
But world powers have insisted that Iran take the first conciliatory step and have been proposing a step-by-step program in which Iran will be rewarded for putting a halt to its high-grade nuclear enrichment, ship out the highly-enriched fuel that it has amassed, and shut down a nuclear facility situated deep in a mountain that is impervious to an airstrike.
Ms. Ashton, the lead negotiator for the six powers in talks, said at the end of two days of meeting Tuesday that "significant gaps" remain between the two sides.
U.S. officials insisted that neither they nor their partners changed their demands in Moscow, or offered any sanctions relief before Iran takes steps to start meeting the international community's demands. In fact, the timing of the July 3 meeting, two days after a ban on Iranian oil purchases goes into effect in Europe, is a sign that Iran hasn't won any easing or postponing of sanctions, they said.
In the weeks leading to the talks, Iran likewise took a tough stance, with Iranian officials reiterating the Islamic Republic's position that enriching uranium is an "absolute right" under the Non-Proliferation Treaty.
Mr. Jalili, the Iranian chief negotiator, told Iranian reporters before entering the talks on Monday that this round of talks was really " a test on whether the West is for or against Iran's scientific progress."
Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who has the last word on all state matters, indirectly made a reference to the nuclear talks in a speech on Monday making it clear where Iran stands on compromise.
"Our enemies should know that arrogance and un-substantiated demands from Iran will lead to nowhere," Mr.Khamenei said, according to official media. He also said Iran's resistance and progress stands as an example of standing up to injustice in the world.
—Farnaz Fassihi and Jay Solomon contributed to this article.
Write to Alan Cullison at alan.cullison@wsj.com
A version of this article appeared June 20, 2012, on page A1 in the U.S. edition of The Wall Street Journal, with the headline: Sanctions for Iran as Talks Fail.

terça-feira, 20 de julho de 2010

Olho por olho, ou o rato que ruge...

Sem comentários...

Iran to retaliate for UN sanctions
By ASSOCIATED PRESS AND JPOST.COM STAFF
Jerusalem Post, 07/20/2010 - 12:57

In tit-for-tat move, Teheran to inspect other countries' transports.

Iran's parliament has adopted a bill authorizing tit-for-tat retaliation against countries that inspect Iranian ships and aircraft as part of the latest set of UN sanctions slapped on Tehran.

Iran's state radio broadcast the Tuesday parliament session live.

The bill follows last month's UN Security Council resolution to impose a fourth set of sanctions against Iran over its disputed nuclear program. The latest sanctions authorize international inspection of suspicious Iranian cargo ferried by ships or aircraft.

Economic pressure on Iran has increased over the past few weeks as tougher UN and US sanctions have begun to take effect.

On Monday, India's Petroleum Secretary S. Sundareshan was quoted by the Wall Street Journal as saying that latest round of unilateral US sanctions against Teheran could derail planned energy projects between Iran and India.

Indian energy companies were considering deals with Iran, a large potential oil source for the fast-growing country. The two countries recently restarted talks over a $7.4 billion natural gas pipeline from Iran to India and Pakistan.