O que é este blog?

Este blog trata basicamente de ideias, se possível inteligentes, para pessoas inteligentes. Ele também se ocupa de ideias aplicadas à política, em especial à política econômica. Ele constitui uma tentativa de manter um pensamento crítico e independente sobre livros, sobre questões culturais em geral, focando numa discussão bem informada sobre temas de relações internacionais e de política externa do Brasil. Para meus livros e ensaios ver o website: www.pralmeida.org. Para a maior parte de meus textos, ver minha página na plataforma Academia.edu, link: https://itamaraty.academia.edu/PauloRobertodeAlmeida;

Meu Twitter: https://twitter.com/PauloAlmeida53

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/paulobooks

quarta-feira, 10 de setembro de 2014

Economia do Brasil, transacoes ilicitas e fuga de capital - Relatório da Global Financial Integrity

Foi publicado um relatório sobre o Brasil no site da Global Financial  Integrity, e cuja matéria é fluxo internacional de capital especulativo:

https://www.facebook.com/GlobalFinancialIntegrity

Segundo o diretor da instituição:
"Illicit financial outflows averaged US$14.7 billion per year for the period from 2000 to 2009. For the period from 2010 to 2012, illicit financial outflows increased to an average of US$33.7 billion per year. These outflows constitute about 1.5 percent of Brazil’s growing GDP for both of these periods. In terms of total magnitude, the country is seventh among developing countries, all of which suffer
from this phenomenon."

Ou seja, sob o reino companheiro, os fluxos de capitais ilíticitos e outras operações especulativas representaram um maior montante de capitais fugindo do Brasil, do que nas épocas anteriores.
Eles vão dizer que é porque o Brasil ficou mais rico.

A íntegra do relatório em inglês está aqui: http://www.gfintegrity.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Brazil-Capital-Flight-Illicit-Flows-and-Macroeconomic-Crises-1960-2012.pdf

Em português pode ser baixado aqui: http://www.gfintegrity.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Brasil-Fuga-de-Capitais-os-Fluxos-Il%C3%ADcitos-e-as-Crises-Macroecon%C3%B4micas-1960-2012.pdf

Primary Findings

The Brazilian economy lost at least US$401.6 billion in illicit financial outflows from 1960 to 2012.
These outflows represent the proceeds of crime, corruption, and tax evasion, and have serious negative consequences for Brazil. Outflows were found to drain resources from the Brazilian economy, to drive the underground economy, and to exacerbate inequality.
Furthermore, the report found that illicit outflows are growing.  Annual average illicit outflows increased from US$310 million in the 1960s to US$14.7 billion in the first decade of the twenty first century before jumping to US$33.7 billion over the last three years of the study, 2010-2012.  On average, Brazil’s illicit outflows are equivalent to 1.5% of the country’s official GDP.
Trade misinvoicing is the major conduit of illicit financial flows from Brazil.  The report reveals that the vast majority of Brazil’s illicit outflows—92.7%, or US$372.3 billion of the US$401.6 billion in total outflows—were channeled through the misinvoicing of trade transactions.  The remaining US$29.4 billion in the illicit outflows detected by GFI occurred via hot money outflows, such as unrecorded wire transfers.

Policy Recommendations

GFI recommends a number of steps the Brazilian government can take to ameliorate the problem of illicit financial flows from the country revolving around two principles:
  1. Greater transparency in domestic and international financial transactions, and
  2. Greater cooperation between governments to shut down the channels through which illicit money flows.
These steps include taking stronger legal measures against trade misinvoicing, instituting transparency of company ownership, and building the technical and human capacity needed to effectively utilize the data that will be shared under emerging tax information exchange arrangements.  GFI notes that the most important ingredient to curbing illicit financial flows from Brazil is generating the political will necessary to implement and enforce these measures.

Broad Capital Flight

In addition to estimating illicit outflows of capital from Brazil, the study also estimates that broad capital flight—a combination consisting of both licit and illicit outflows—amounted to US$590.2 billion between 1960 and 2012.  Broad capital flight was found to average roughly 2.2% of Brazil’s official GDP over the study period.
Illicit outflows constituted 68% of total capital flight, and they were shown to drive broad capital flight from Brazil.

Underground Economy

The report estimated that the size of Brazil’s underground economy averaged 38.9% of official GDP over the 53-year period, increasing from an average of 45.8% in the 1960s to 55.1% in the 1970s before slowly falling to an average of 21.8% from 2010 through 2012, as a result of faster economic growth.

Methodology

This report utilizes the same methodology to calculate illicit flows as was used in GFI’s 2014 case study on the Philippines and in GFI’s 2013 global update on illicit financial flows.  GFI cautions that the methodology is very conservative and that there are likely to be more illicit flows from Brazil that are not captured by the models.  For example, a large amount of the proceeds of abusive transfer pricing between arms of the same multinational corporation as well as much of the earnings from drug trafficking, human smuggling, and other criminal activities—which are often settled in cash—are not included in these estimates.
Moreover, this report uses the largest Structural and Behavioral Equations Model developed by Dr. Kar to analyze the drivers and dynamics of Brazil’s illicit flows.

Acknowledgements

About the Author
Dev Kar is Global Financial Integrity’s Chief Economist, having formerly served as a Senior Economist at the International Monetary Fund.
Contributions
Brian LeBlanc assisted with the data analysis, and Joshua Simmons contributed to the policy analysis.
Raymond Baker, Christine Clough, Clark Gascoigne, Taylor Le, Channing May, and Melissa O’Brien also supported this project.
Funding
Funding for this report was generously provided by the Ford Foundation.

Nenhum comentário: