Temas de relações internacionais, de política externa e de diplomacia brasileira, com ênfase em políticas econômicas, viagens, livros e cultura em geral. Um quilombo de resistência intelectual em defesa da racionalidade, da inteligência e das liberdades democráticas. Ver também minha página: www.pralmeida.net (em construção).
sábado, 6 de julho de 2019
Bill of Rights (1689): a garantia da democracia inflesa, depois britânica
The English Bill of Rights, or "An Act Declaring the Rights and Liberties of the Subject and Settling the Succession of the Crown," was passed by Parliament on 16 December 1689. It was a re-statement in statutory form of the Declaration of Right presented by the Convention Parliament to William and Mary in March 1689 inviting them to become joint sovereigns of England. The Bill of Rights lays down limits on the powers of sovereign and sets out the rights of Parliament and rules for freedom of speech in Parliament, the requirement to regular elections to Parliament and the right to petition the monarch without fear of retribution. It also reestablished the liberty of Protestants bear arms for their defense and condemned James II of England for "causing several good subjects being Protestants to be disarmed at the same time when papists were both armed and employed contrary to law."
The Bill of Rights is noteworthy for being the first political document to reflect the natural rights and political philosophy of renowned political philosopher John Locke, who would greatly influence America’s Founding Fathers a century later. In particular, it codified Locke’s “social contract theory,” requiring monarchs to seek the consent of the people, who are represented in Parliament.
In the United Kingdom, the Bill of Rights is further accompanied by the Magna Carta, Habeas Corpus Act 1679 and Parliament Acts 1911 and 1949 as some of the basic documents of the uncodified British constitution. Its provisions are instantly recognizable within the U.S. Constitution and its own Bill of Rights, which would follow nearly 100 years later.
Among the provisions are:
• The sovereign cannot unilaterally establish new courts or act as a judge.
• The agreement of parliament became necessary for the implementation of any new taxes.
• Only civil courts, not Church courts, are legal
• Freedom to petition the monarch without fear of retribution
• No standing army may be maintained during a time of peace without the consent of parliament.
• No royal interference in the freedom of the people to have arms for their own defence
• Freedom of speech and debates;
• No excessive bail or "cruel and unusual" punishments may be imposed.
Assinar:
Postar comentários (Atom)
Postagem em destaque
Livro Marxismo e Socialismo finalmente disponível - Paulo Roberto de Almeida
Meu mais recente livro – que não tem nada a ver com o governo atual ou com sua diplomacia esquizofrênica, já vou logo avisando – ficou final...
-
Carreira Diplomática: respondendo a um questionário Paulo Roberto de Almeida ( www.pralmeida.org ) Respostas a questões colocadas por gradua...
-
Stephen Kotkin is a legendary historian, currently at Hoover, previously at Princeton. Best known for his Stalin biographies, his other wor...
-
Ficha catalográfica de um livro saindo agora do "forno": Intelectuais na diplomacia brasileira : a cultura a serviço da nação /...
-
Brasil: cronologia sumária do multilateralismo econômico, 1856-2006 Paulo Roberto de Almeida In: Ricardo Seitenfus e Deisy Ventura, Direito ...
-
Licença pouco poética para espezinhar quem merece (com desculpas às almas sensíveis) Jornalistas diversos e até psiquiatras (que não deveri...
-
Artigo do embaixador Jorio Dauster sobre a ironia trágica decorrente do fato que o autocrata DJT patrocinou, com seu espetáculo Hollywoodia...
-
O Brasil é mesmo uma democracia, um amigo da democracia? Paulo Roberto de Almeida, diplomata, professor. Nota sobre as democracias que apoia...
-
Trump apresenta lista de exigências para o novo governo da Venezuela Fim de apoio para adversários dos EUA, expulsão de cubanos e pleno ace...
-
Um trabalho mais do que atual: 5104. “ Rupturas nas relações internacionais no contexto do triunvirato imperial ”, Brasília, 2 novembro 20...

Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário