O que é este blog?

Este blog trata basicamente de ideias, se possível inteligentes, para pessoas inteligentes. Ele também se ocupa de ideias aplicadas à política, em especial à política econômica. Ele constitui uma tentativa de manter um pensamento crítico e independente sobre livros, sobre questões culturais em geral, focando numa discussão bem informada sobre temas de relações internacionais e de política externa do Brasil. Para meus livros e ensaios ver o website: www.pralmeida.org. Para a maior parte de meus textos, ver minha página na plataforma Academia.edu, link: https://itamaraty.academia.edu/PauloRobertodeAlmeida;

Meu Twitter: https://twitter.com/PauloAlmeida53

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/paulobooks

Mostrando postagens com marcador RDA. Mostrar todas as postagens
Mostrando postagens com marcador RDA. Mostrar todas as postagens

sábado, 9 de novembro de 2019

Queda do muro de Berlim e desaparecimento da RDA: como reconstruir os arquivos da Stasi - WP

Thirty years after the Berlin Wall fell, a Stasi spy puzzle remains unsolved

BERLIN — In the aftermath of the fall of the Berlin Wall 30 years ago, East Germany’s secret police frantically tried to destroy millions of documents that laid bare the astounding reach of mass surveillance used to keep an iron grip on citizens.
As shredders that were available jammed or broke down, Stasi officers resorted to tearing the documents by hand, stuffing them into bags to later be burned or pulped. But the effort came to a premature halt when citizens groups stormed and occupied Stasi offices to preserve the evidence.
Three decades later, in the same rooms behind the foreboding gray facade of the former Stasi headquarters, Barbara Poenisch and nine fellow archivists are trying to piece those documents, and the history, back together. 
Poenisch calls it “a big puzzle game.” But at the current rate, there are still decades of work ahead.
The archivists have reconstructed more than 1.5 million pages contained in 500 sacks over the past 20 years. There are still around 15,500 more bags to go, stored in Berlin and sites in eastern Germany.
A single sack can take an archivist as long as a year and a half to reconstruct, depending on how finely the documents are torn. Attempts to speed up the process with digital technology have stalled.
The painstaking work, performed by hand, continues amid controversy over the future of the Stasi files.
The German parliament voted this fall to transfer control of the files to the Federal Archives, with promises to invest in preservation and digitalization. Some historians and former regime opponents have criticized the move, saying it is an attempt to draw a line under history and raising concerns that files will become less accessible.
Every German has the right to view the records that the Ministry for State Security, as the Stasi was officially known, gathered on them. More than 3 million individuals have applied to do so.
The agency used tens of thousands of employees and a vast web of informants to monitor every facet of society, causing many East Germans to live in terror. It kept files on 5.6 million people.
Reconstructed pages from the Stasi files have shed light on the agency’s investigations into a Nazi war criminal and into the peace networks in both East and West Germany. 
For Poenisch it’s a more personal document that sticks in her mind: a letter from a mother who pleaded to authorities to release her jailed son.
Poenisch spreads out paper fragments on a table. The sack she’s been working on is from the Abteilung N, responsible for communication within the state apparatus and with friendly countries. 
A memo from Oct. 1, 1986, reports that the political situation in East Germany is “calm and stable. . . . There have been no significant events in either the economy or transport sector.”
Another memo, from April of the same year, outlines a long-term plan for the Stasi to keep up with technological advances. The goal is to achieve a “uniform, integrated digital intelligence network beyond year 2000.”
For the year 2019, the project to reconstitute the documents is surprisingly low-tech.
There’s precedent for reconstituting shredded documents. In the mid-1980s, Iran pieced together and published intelligence reports and operational accounts that had been put through a shredder as Iranian militant students seized control of the U.S. Embassy in Tehran.
More recently, programmers in California have promoted software that can do what the Iranians were thought to have done by hand.
But the Stasi project does not have the technology to deal with shredded material, said Ute Michalsky, the head of the reconstruction department. 
An “E-puzzler” software program, developed by researchers at Berlin’s Fraunhofer Institute, had sounded promising. It was supposed to match scanned fragments together based on paper color, fonts, shapes and other details. But it turned out to be more time-consuming than the manual effort and has not been used for the past two years. 
The German government has dedicated 2 million euros to enhance the scan technology.
The archivists say they don’t bother trying to piece together material torn into more than eight pieces, even though they may be those the Stasi were more keen to hide. 
“I sometimes have the feeling that they knew exactly what to tear up,” Poenisch said. “Unimportant things only get a single tear, but important things: the more important, the smaller the pieces.”
Poenisch says the laborious work doesn’t get dull. 
“The responsibility is high,” she said. “Every document could be important.” 

William Glucroft in Berlin contributed to this report. 

quarta-feira, 28 de janeiro de 2015

Russia contesta anexacao da RDA pela RFA em 1989: back to the future - Adam Taylor (WP)

Em primeiro lugar, a Duma da Rússia não tem nada a ver com um evento que ocorreu em outro país, num momento em que a Rússia não existia como Estado soberano no plano internacional, pois ela era uma república federada da União Soviética, hoje (felizmente) desaparecida.
Em segundo lugar, eles poderiam se ocupar de coisas mais importantes do que fazer girar para trás a roda da História, como disse Marx no Manifesto Comunista.
Em terceiro lugar, quem decidiu foi o povo da RDA, ou os alemães do leste, que estavam cansados de comer repolho, calçar botinas soviéticas e andar naquele fabuloso carro que se chamava Trabant.
Eles votaram com os pés, quebrando muros e cercas, e unificando as duas partes da Alemanha indiferentes ao que pensavam os dirigentes. O chanceler alemão à época, Helmut Kohl, até pagou, e muito, aos soviéticos, para eles deixarem o território da RDA e levarem os seus tanques e mísseis de volta. De mais a mais, Kohl também efetuou uma conversão do OstMark muito favorável aos habitantes da finada RDA, pois a taxa de câmbio real era muito mais baixa.
Talvez os russos de hoje não gostem do fim da Guerra Fria, mas eles vão precisar entrar na De Lorean do filme Back to the Future, para mudar os eventos de 1989.
Paulo Roberto de Almeida

Russia’s bizarre proposal to condemn West Germany’s 1989 ‘annexation’ of East Germany

January 28 at 2:58 PM
Russian lawmakers will consider a new statement that would condemn an event that happened 25 years ago – the reunification of Germany.
According to Russian news agency Tass, State Duma speaker Sergey Naryshkin has asked the Duma's Committee on Foreign Affairs to look into condemning the "annexation" of East Germany by West Germany in 1989.
Given the time that's passed and the relative success of German reunification, the idea has struck many as absurd: Mikhail Gorbachev, leader of the Soviet Union in 1989, called it "nonsense"  Wednesday. Similar outlandish statements have been made by Russian lawmakers recently – last year, one proposed a ban on high heels, for example.
However, this proposal can't be as easily dismissed: Naryshkin is an ally of President Vladimir Putin and it seems unlikely he would have made such a bold statement without the Russian leader's approval.
And while the events it concerns may be long in the past, the motivation is likely the present. The plan was originally put forward by Nikolay Ivanov, a Communist Party lawmaker, who has argued that the reunification of Germany was insufficiently democratic. "Unlike Crimea, a referendum was not conducted in the German Democratic Republic," Ivanov was quoted as saying, referring to the region of Ukraine that broke away to join Russia last year after a disputed referendum.
Russia and Germany have an important, if complicated, relationship. Chancellor Angela Merkel is perhaps the closest Western leader to Putin – she grew up in East Germany, and – like Putin, who served with the KGB in Dresden –  can speak both German and Russian. However, Merkel has been a prominent voice supporting sanctions on Russia after actions in Ukraine, and the relationship has been strained. Merkel famously told President  Obama that the Russian leader was living "in another world."
Ivanov pointed to comments made by the Luxembourgian president of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE), Anne Brasseur, who had accused Russia of annexing Crimea, and said his proposal was a "form of a retaliatory step." Merkel herself had also recently condemned Russia for its actions in Crime. “The annexation of Crimea is a violation of something that has made up our peaceful coexistence, namely the protection of borders and territorial integrity,” Merkel said last week in Davos, Switzerland.
Even if the proposal is just bluster, a direct comparison between the two events does seem a little hard to make. The reunification of Germany occurred after Hungary removed its border fence, allowing thousands of East Germans escape  to the West, and eventually helped to topple the Berlin wall. After large protests, the socialist German Democratic Republic (GDR) later held free and fair elections in 1990, which led to the formation of a pro-reunification government that signed an agreement to dissolve East Germany and join with the West.
Meanwhile, Crimea followed violence in the Ukrainian capital of Kiev and the ousting of pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych, and the mysterious arrival of the "little green men" widely assumed to be Russian troops. A rushed referendum was held with these troops in town, which produced overwhelmingly pro-Russian results.
As Gorbachev put it, the times are different. "You can't make judgments about what happened in another era, 25 years ago, from current-day conditions," the former general secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union told Interfax. "What referendum could have been held while hundreds of thousands of people rallied both in the GDR and the FRG [the Federal Republic of Germany or West Germany], the only motto being 'We are one nation?' "
Adam Taylor writes about foreign affairs for The Washington Post. Originally from London, he studied at the University of Manchester and Columbia University.

quarta-feira, 13 de agosto de 2014

Muro de Berlim: neste dia em 1961, a construcao da prisao sovietica na capital da Alemanha

Depois de anos e anos perdendo pessoas, que votavam com os pés fugindo para a Alemanha ocidental, via Berlim ocidental, os soviéticos fizeram aquilo que já faziam em seu país: construir uma prisão, transformando os súditos da RDA em servos do Estado soviético.
 Essa vergonha durou décadas, até ruir com a implosão virtual da URSS, e depois a sua implosão de fato.
Paulo Roberto de Almeida
Nesta Data

Construção do Muro de Berlim

No dia 13 de agosto de 1961, o Muro de Berlim começou a ser construído


O Muro de Berlim foi uma construção erguida em 1961 pelo regime socialista da hoje extinta República Democrática Alemã, também conhecida como Alemanha Oriental, que se destinava a separar as duas áreas da cidade de Berlim, à época dividida em um setor capitalista e outro socialista. A construção deste abominável símbolo da Guerra Fria  iniciou-se a 13 de agosto de 1961, estendendo-se por 37 quilômetros afora dentro da zona urbana da cidade de Berlim, à época, com cerca de 3 milhões de habitantes.
As origens da construção do muro encontram-se no fim da Segunda Guerra Mundial, com a derrota da Alemanha e sua consequente ocupação pelas forças aliadas. Cada país vencedor “herdou” um setor da cidade de Berlim, e desse modo foram criados um setor americano, um inglês, um francês e outro soviético. Os três primeiros uniram-se para formar a área da cidade que adotaria o regime capitalista, Berlim Ocidental, que seria anexada à nascente República Federal da Alemanha (a capitalista Alemanha Ocidental). O lado soviético daria origem a Berlim Oriental, que se tornaria a capital da Alemanha Oriental.
Tal situação gerou uma configuração inusitada dentro da Alemanha dividida, pois o setor capitalista de Berlim estava mergulhado em território da Alemanha Oriental, formando assim, um enclave capitalista dentro do país socialista, complicando as comunicações de Berlim Ocidental com seu próprio país. Tal dificuldade acentuou-se quando do lançamento do Plano Marshall, destinado a ajudar economicamente todos os países europeus do bloco capitalista afetados pela guerra, pois Stalin, contrariado pela negativa de cobertura do plano aos países socialistas, resolve impor um bloqueio a Berlim Ocidental, fechando todas as vias de comunicação.  O objetivo dos russos era forçar os aliados a abandonar o controle de seu setor da cidade, porém tal manobra não deu os resultados desejados, pois os americanos quebraram o bloqueio por meio de rotas aéreas destinadas a abastecer e manter o status de Berlim Ocidental.