Read, Kids, Read
MAY 12, 2014
As an uncle I’m
inconsistent about too many things.
Birthdays, for
example. My nephew Mark had one on Sunday, and I didn’t remember — and send a
text — until 10 p.m., by which point he was asleep.
School
productions, too. I saw my niece Bella in “Seussical: The Musical” but missed
“The Wiz.” She played Toto, a feat of trans-species transmogrification that not
even Meryl, with all of her accents, has pulled off.
But about
books, I’m steady. Relentless. I’m incessantly asking my nephews and nieces
what they’re reading and why they’re not reading more. I’m reliably hurling
novels at them, and also at friends’ kids. I may well be responsible for 10
percent of all sales of “The Fault in Our Stars,” a teenage love
story to be released as a movie next month. Never have I spent money with fewer
regrets, because I believe in reading — not just in its power to transport but
in its power to transform.
So I was
crestfallen on Monday, when a new report by Common Sense Media came out.
It showed that 30 years ago, only 8 percent
of 13-year-olds and 9 percent of 17-year-olds said that they “hardly ever” or
never read for pleasure. Today, 22 percent of 13-year-olds and 27 percent of
17-year-olds say that. Fewer than 20 percent of 17-year-olds now read for
pleasure “almost every day.” Back in 1984, 31 percent did. What a marked and
depressing change.
I know, I know:
This sounds like a fogy’s crotchety lament. Or, worse, like self-interest.
Professional writers arguing for vigorous reading are dinosaurs begging for a
last breath. We’re panhandlers with a better vocabulary.
But I’m coming
at this differently, as someone persuaded that reading does things — to the
brain, heart and spirit — that movies, television, video games and the rest of
it cannot.
There’s
research on this, and it’s cited in a recent articlein The Guardian by Dan Hurley, who wrote that
after “three years interviewing psychologists and neuroscientists around the
world,” he’d concluded that “reading and intelligence have a relationship so
close as to be symbiotic.”
In terms of
smarts and success, is reading causative or merely correlated? Which comes
first, “The Hardy Boys” or the hardy mind? That’s difficult to unravel, but
several studies have suggested that people who read fiction, reveling in its
analysis of character and motivation, are more adept at reading people, too: at
sizing up the social whirl around them. They’re more empathetic. God knows we need
that.
Late last year,
neuroscientists at Emory Universityreported enhanced neural activity in
people who’d been given a regular course of daily reading, which seemed to jog
the brain: to raise its game, if you will.
Some experts
have doubts about that experiment’s methodology, but I’m struck by how its
findings track something that my friends and I often discuss. If we spend our
last hours or minutes of the night reading rather than watching television, we
wake the next morning with thoughts less jumbled, moods less jangled. Reading
has bequeathed what meditation promises. It has smoothed and focused us.
Maybe that’s
about the quiet of reading, the pace of it. At Success Academy Charter Schools
in New York City, whose students significantly outperform most peers statewide,
the youngest kids all learn and play chess, in part because it hones “the
ability to focus and concentrate,” said Sean O’Hanlon, who supervises the
program. Doesn’t reading do the same?
Daniel
Willingham, a psychology professor at the University of Virginia,
framed it as a potentially crucial corrective to the rapid metabolism and
sensory overload of digital technology. He told me that it can demonstrate to
kids that there’s payoff in “doing something taxing, in delayed gratification.”
A new book of his, “Raising Kids Who Read,” will be published later this year.
Before talking
with him, I arranged a conference call withDavid
Levithan and Amanda Maciel. Both have written fiction in
the young adult genre, whose current robustness is cause to rejoice, and they
rightly noted that the intensity of the connection that a person feels to a
favorite novel, with which he or she spends eight or 10 or 20 hours, is unlike
any response to a movie.
That
observation brought to mind a moment in “The Fault in Our Stars” when one of
the protagonists says that sometimes, “You read a book and it fills you with
this weird evangelical zeal, and you become convinced that the shattered world
will never be put back together unless and until all living humans read the
book.”
Books are
personal, passionate. They stir emotions and spark thoughts in a manner all
their own, and I’m convinced that the shattered world has less hope for repair
if reading becomes an ever smaller part of it.
The Opinion Pages | LETTERS
The Gift of
Reading, to Last a Lifetime
MAY
18, 2014
To the Editor:
Re “Read, Kids, Read,” by Frank Bruni (column,
May 13):
I was raised in Communist Albania. Books were censored, and
only those that were government-approved were allowed.
I am an avid reader, and the reason for that was my
grandparents’ secret library, which made it through World War II and Communist
censorship and was hidden in a room with no windows accessible by a doorway
behind a heavy shelf. Only close family members knew about it. I couldn’t tell
anyone outside the family. I did let slip once in high school that I had read
Homer’s “Iliad.” I had to deflect questions about where and how I found the
book. It was scary.
Another different thing when I grew up was a lack of TV. You
had to use books to fill your time and imagination. So now I do the same for my
two children. Provide books and allow very little screen time. It works
wonders. They can’t go a day without reading.
People are amazed at how creative and imaginative they are
and how they can sit still and focus for long periods of time. I credit reading
for all that.
VALBONA SCHWAB
Watertown, Mass., May 13, 2014
Watertown, Mass., May 13, 2014
To the Editor:
I couldn’t agree more with Frank Bruni about the importance
of reading. But Daniel Willingham, the University of Virginia psychology
professor he quotes, frames reading as a taxing process in delayed
gratification. Really? Nothing pleases my grandchildren more than a visit to
BookHampton on a summer weekend with us or a long bedtime read with Grandpa
when we visit.
Children should see reading as a pleasurable activity.
Parents should read to their children early and often and show their children
their own delight in reading books. This is the only way I know to nurture
young readers and give them the message that reading is rewarding in its own
right.
My mother passed on her love of reading to me, and I regard
it as one of her greatest gifts. It is a priceless legacy that I think that I
have passed on to my own children and that they in turn are passing on to
theirs.
BETH KRUGMAN
New York, May 13, 2014
New York, May 13, 2014
A
version of this letter appears in print on May 19, 2014, on page A16 of
the New York edition with the headline: The Gift of Reading, to Last
a Lifetime.
